Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (drm/i915)

2021-01-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Randy Dunlap (2021-01-27 20:28:05) > On 1/27/21 11:30 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 1/27/21 11:08 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 1/27/21 6:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( > >>> > >>> Changes since 20210125: > >>> > >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (drm/i915)

2021-01-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/27/21 11:30 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 1/27/21 11:08 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 1/27/21 6:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( >>> >>> Changes since 20210125: >>> >> >> on x86_64: >> >> ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In func

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (NETFS_SUPPORT)

2021-01-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/27/21 6:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( > > Changes since 20210125: > on i386: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for NETFS_SUPPORT Depends on [n]: NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS [=n] Selected by [y]: - FSCACHE [=y] Full rand

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (drm/i915)

2021-01-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/27/21 11:08 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 1/27/21 6:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( >> >> Changes since 20210125: >> > > on x86_64: > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function ‘i915_gem_freeze_late’: > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i9

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (drm/i915)

2021-01-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/27/21 6:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( > > Changes since 20210125: > on x86_64: ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function ‘i915_gem_freeze_late’: ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1182:2: error: implicit declaration of fu

linux-next: Tree for Jan 27

2021-01-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Note: the patch file has failed to upload :-( Changes since 20210125: New tree: fscache The fscache tree gained a conflict against the pidfd tree. The ecryptfs tree gained a conflict against the pidfd tree. The block tree gained conflicts against the vfs and fscache trees. The integr

linux-next: Tree for Jan 27

2016-01-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160125: New tree: btrfs-kdave The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from next-20160111. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1141 989 files changed, 38122 insertions(+), 11891 deletions(-) -

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (build failures due to 'don't offset memmap for flatmem')

2015-02-02 Thread Laura Abbott
On 1/27/2015 9:31 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:51:23PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150123: The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc and net trees. The drm-panel tree gained a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (build failures due to 'don't offset memmap for flatmem')

2015-01-27 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:51:23PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150123: > > The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The net-next tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc and net trees. > > The drm-panel tree gained a conflict against the drm tr

linux-next: Tree for Jan 27

2015-01-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150123: The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc and net trees. The drm-panel tree gained a conflict against the drm tree. The wireless-drivers-next tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a co