Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17 (drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.o)

2020-07-20 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hello, On 17/07/2020 09:49:05-0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > on x86_64: > # CONFIG_WATCHDOG is not set > > ld: drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.o: in function `ds1374_probe': > rtc-ds1374.c:(.text+0x736): undefined reference to `watchdog_init_timeout' > ld: rtc-ds1374.c:(.text+0x77e): undefined reference to

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17 (drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.o)

2020-07-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Johnson, On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 03:46:15 + Johnson CH Chen (陳昭勳) wrote: > > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:49:05 -0700 Randy Dunlap > > wrote: > > > on x86_64: > > > # CONFIG_WATCHDOG is not set > > > > > Thanks for your information. > > It seems RTC_DRV_DS1374_WDT should be depended on

RE: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17 (drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.o)

2020-07-19 Thread 陳昭勳
gt; Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17 (drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.o) > > Hi Randy, > > [Please trim your emails a bit more, thanks] > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:49:05 -0700 Randy Dunlap > wrote: > > on x86_64: > > # CONFIG_WATCHDOG is not set > > Thanks for

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17 (drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.o)

2020-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Randy, [Please trim your emails a bit more, thanks] On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:49:05 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > on x86_64: > # CONFIG_WATCHDOG is not set > > ld: drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.o: in function `ds1374_probe': > rtc-ds1374.c:(.text+0x736): undefined reference to `watchdog_init_timeout' >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17 (drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.o)

2020-07-17 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/17/20 4:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200716: > > New tree: init > Changed tree: dmi (from quilt to git) > > My fixes tree contains: > > dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") > > I revreted 3 commits from the powerpc tree due to

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2020-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200716: New tree: init Changed tree: dmi (from quilt to git) My fixes tree contains: dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") I revreted 3 commits from the powerpc tree due to reported run time problems. The sound tree gained a semantic

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2019-07-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:33 PM Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 05:30:47PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Hi Steven, Hi Darrick, > > > > Unfortunately, my build-script is not working anymore. > > > > I am using builddeb/mkdebian scripts. > > Yeah, I accidentally uploaded an

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2019-07-17 Thread Darrick J. Wong
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 05:30:47PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Steven, Hi Darrick, > > Unfortunately, my build-script is not working anymore. > > I am using builddeb/mkdebian scripts. Yeah, I accidentally uploaded an internal build patch yesterday which got sucked into for-next. It's been

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2019-07-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Steven, Hi Darrick, Unfortunately, my build-script is not working anymore. I am using builddeb/mkdebian scripts. [ BUILD-LOG ] ... set -e; mkdir -p include/config/; { echo "5.2.0$(/bin/bash ./scripts/setlocalversion .)"; } > include/config/kernel.release.tmp; if [ -r

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2019-07-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add v5.4 material to your linux-next included branches until after v5.3-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20190716: The kbuild tree lost its build failure. The xfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2695 2480

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2018-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180716: New tree: h8300 The arm-soc tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The integrity tree gained a build failure due to duplictae patches not merging correctly. I applied a merge fix patch. The staging tree gained a

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2018-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180716: New tree: h8300 The arm-soc tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The integrity tree gained a build failure due to duplictae patches not merging correctly. I applied a merge fix patch. The staging tree gained a

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2017-07-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170714: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 647 708 files changed, 24530 insertions(+), 8919 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2017-07-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170714: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 647 708 files changed, 24530 insertions(+), 8919 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2015-07-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:41:51 -0400 Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > I noticed there are a bunch of new (appeared in the last day or two) > fails spread around, so I did a triage/bisect of them so we have a > better idea of what is going on as we start the week. Thanks for this. Lets hope

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2015-07-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:41:51 -0400 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote: I noticed there are a bunch of new (appeared in the last day or two) fails spread around, so I did a triage/bisect of them so we have a better idea of what is going on as we start the week. Thanks

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2015-07-18 Thread Paul Gortmaker
I noticed there are a bunch of new (appeared in the last day or two) fails spread around, so I did a triage/bisect of them so we have a better idea of what is going on as we start the week. Unfortunately I was unable to reproduce the sparc fail, so I don't know what is going on there Biggest

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2015-07-18 Thread Paul Gortmaker
I noticed there are a bunch of new (appeared in the last day or two) fails spread around, so I did a triage/bisect of them so we have a better idea of what is going on as we start the week. Unfortunately I was unable to reproduce the sparc fail, so I don't know what is going on there Biggest

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2015-07-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150716: Added tree: samaung-krzk The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The regmap tree gained conflicts against the sound-asoc tree. I added several supplied patches to the

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2015-07-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150716: Added tree: samaung-krzk The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The regmap tree gained conflicts against the sound-asoc tree. I added several supplied patches to the

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2014-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140716: The mvebu tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the arm trees. The samsung tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc tree. The wireless-next tree lost its build failure. The usb-gadget tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The akpm tree lost its build

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2014-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140716: The mvebu tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the arm trees. The samsung tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc tree. The wireless-next tree lost its build failure. The usb-gadget tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The akpm tree lost its build

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:09:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:38:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > So these are the errors I got yesterday: > > sound/soc/fsl/imx-mc13783.c:23:28: fatal error: asm/mach-types.h: No such > > file or directory > > #include > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:09:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:38:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: So these are the errors I got yesterday: sound/soc/fsl/imx-mc13783.c:23:28: fatal error: asm/mach-types.h: No such file or directory

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mark, On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:38:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > So these are the errors I got yesterday: > > sound/soc/fsl/imx-mc13783.c:23:28: fatal error: asm/mach-types.h: No such > file or directory > #include > ^ > > I didn't look closely enough,

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mark, [Sorry for the delay, I had to go into work to find the logs of yesterday's builds.] On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:31:34 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:13:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > The sound-asoc tree still has its build failure so I used the version

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:13:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The sound-asoc tree still has its build failure so I used the version from > next-20130715. I'd have expected both of those to have been fixed. Are you sure you're seeing the same issue? signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:13:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: The sound-asoc tree still has its build failure so I used the version from next-20130715. I'd have expected both of those to have been fixed. Are you sure you're seeing the same issue? signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mark, [Sorry for the delay, I had to go into work to find the logs of yesterday's builds.] On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:31:34 +0100 Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:13:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: The sound-asoc tree still has its build failure so I used

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mark, On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:38:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: So these are the errors I got yesterday: sound/soc/fsl/imx-mc13783.c:23:28: fatal error: asm/mach-types.h: No such file or directory #include asm/mach-types.h ^ I

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130716: New tree: aio The sound-asoc tree still has its build failure so I used the version from next-20130715. The aio tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. I have

linux-next: Tree for Jul 17

2013-07-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130716: New tree: aio The sound-asoc tree still has its build failure so I used the version from next-20130715. The aio tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. I have