Hi all,
Changes since 20200702:
My fixes tree contains:
dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning")
b236d81d9e4f ("powerpc/boot/dts: Fix dtc "pciex" warnings")
The tip tree still had one build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The kspp tree gained a conflict against
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:29:26PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > On 7/3/19 4:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Changes since 20190702:
> > >
> >
> > on i386:
>
> Oh, well. net/gre.h was included
Hello,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 7/3/19 4:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20190702:
> >
>
> on i386:
Oh, well. net/gre.h was included by CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK, so
it is failing when CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK is not used.
Pa
On 7/3/19 4:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190702:
>
on i386:
CC net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.o
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c: In function ‘ipvs_gre_decap’:
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1618:22: error: storage size of ‘_greh’
isn’t known
struc
On 7/3/19 4:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190702:
>
on i386 or x86_64:
ERROR: "dm_ip_block" [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.ko] undefined!
or
ld: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nv.o: in function `nv_set_ip_blocks':
nv.c:(.text+0x1660): undefined reference to `dm_i
Hi all,
Changes since 20190702:
The rdma tree still had its build failures so I used the version from
next-20190628.
The block tree gained a conflict against the xfs tree.
The hmm tree still had failures due to interactions with the tip and
drm trees for which I added 2 merge fix patches.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20180702:
The net-next tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with Linus'
tree for which I applied a merge fix patch.
The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
a commit.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3320
3593 files c
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.14 material to you linux-next included branches
until after v4.13-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20170630:
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the arm64 and net trees.
The drm tree gained conflicts against the vfs tree.
The sound-asoc tree still ha
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.3 related material to your linux-next included
branches until after v4.2-rc1 is released.
Changes since 20150702:
The akpm tree lost several patches that turned up elsewhere.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1055
876 files changed, 57060 insertions(
On 07/03/2014 10:32 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 07/02/14 22:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20140702:
on x86_64:
CONFIG_UNISYSSPAR=y
CONFIG_UNISYS_VISORUTIL=m
# CONFIG_UNISYS_VISORCHANNEL is not set
CONFIG_UNISYS_CHANNELSTUB=y
drivers/built-in.o: In function `channel_mod_in
On 07/02/14 22:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20140702:
>
on x86_64:
CONFIG_UNISYSSPAR=y
CONFIG_UNISYS_VISORUTIL=m
# CONFIG_UNISYS_VISORCHANNEL is not set
CONFIG_UNISYS_CHANNELSTUB=y
drivers/built-in.o: In function `channel_mod_init':
chanstub.c:(.init.text+0x10a8f): u
Hi all,
Changes since 20140702:
My fixes tree contains:
powerpc: Disable RELOCATABLE for COMPILE_TEST with PPC64
The staging tree still had its build failure for which I disabled a driver.
The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
Non-merge commits (rela
Hi Jörn,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 10:48:03 -0400 Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 July 2013 12:25:41 +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next appears to introduce some BUGs when running the
> > libhugetlbfs
> > testsuite (under both ARM64 and x86_64):
> >
> > [ 94.320661] BUG: Bad rss-
On Wed, 3 July 2013 12:25:41 +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next appears to introduce some BUGs when running the
> libhugetlbfs
> testsuite (under both ARM64 and x86_64):
>
> [ 94.320661] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:880119461040 idx:1 val:-512
> [ 94.330346] BUG: Bad rss-
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130702:
>>>
>>> The powerpc tree lost its build failure.
>>>
>>> The device-mapper tree ga
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 06:06:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130702:
>
> The powerpc tree lost its build failure.
>
> The device-mapper tree gained a conflict against the md tree.
>
> The net-next tree gained a build failure for which I cherry-picked an
> upco
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130702:
>>
>> The powerpc tree lost its build failure.
>>
>> The device-mapper tree gained a conflict against the md tree.
>>
>> The net-next tree gai
17 matches
Mail list logo
