Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)

2012-07-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> BTW, didn't see your tree in linux-next [1]. >> >> [1] >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=blob;f=Next/Trees#l184 > > Look at line 185? > Yesterday or

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)

2012-07-12 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > BTW, didn't see your tree in linux-next [1]. > > [1] > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=blob;f=Next/Trees#l184 Look at line 185? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)

2012-07-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> I see the same build-error as Randy in latest linux.git >> (055c9fa8874fa7261eec7a268366565db84af474). > > Yes, it is there. > >> Where is this patch queued up (see original posting)?

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)

2012-07-11 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > I see the same build-error as Randy in latest linux.git > (055c9fa8874fa7261eec7a268366565db84af474). Yes, it is there. > Where is this patch queued up (see original posting)? Here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpi

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)

2012-07-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I see the same build-error as Randy in latest linux.git (055c9fa8874fa7261eec7a268366565db84af474). Where is this patch queued up (see original posting)? I do not see any patch in [2]. And please please please rename your repo... "linux-2.6" died many months ago :-). I also do not see any pa

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)

2012-07-11 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/10/2012 12:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> >> Changes since 20120709: > > when CONFIG_OF_GPIO is not enabled: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c: In function 'tps65910_gpio_probe': > drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c:152:26: error: 'struct gp

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (iio)

2012-07-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 07/10/2012 12:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120709: > on x86_64: drivers/iio/dac/ad5064.c: In function 'ad5064_i2c_write': drivers/iio/dac/ad5064.c:132:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'i2c_master_send' -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)

2012-07-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 07/10/2012 12:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120709: > on i386: when CONFIG_OF_GPIO is not enabled: drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c: In function 'tps65910_gpio_probe': drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65910.c:152:26: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member named 'of_node'

linux-next: Tree for July 10

2012-07-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20120709: I have not done the powerpc allyesconfig build today as it is too broken. The ext4 tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20120709. The v4l-dvb tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20120706. The infiniband tree lo