Re: ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7? (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ])

2013-08-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Ping ? > > It seems 3.11 is pretty close to releasing but we stil have LTP msgctl08 > causing a > hang (atleast on ARC) for both linux-next 20130829 as well as Linus tree. > > So far, I haven't seemed to have drawn attention of people involv

Re: ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7? (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ])

2013-08-30 Thread Vineet Gupta
Ping ? It seems 3.11 is pretty close to releasing but we stil have LTP msgctl08 causing a hang (atleast on ARC) for both linux-next 20130829 as well as Linus tree. So far, I haven't seemed to have drawn attention of people involved. -Vineet On 08/29/2013 01:22 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu,

Re: ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7? (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ])

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 08/29/2013 08:34 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Vineet Gupta >> wrote: >>> Hi David, >>> >>> On 06/26/2013 04:59 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 23:41 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue

Re: ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7? (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ])

2013-08-29 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 08/29/2013 08:34 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Vineet Gupta > wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> On 06/26/2013 04:59 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 23:41 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >

Re: ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7? (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ])

2013-08-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Hi David, > > On 06/26/2013 04:59 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 23:41 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Davidlohr Bueso >>> wrote: On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 18:10 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:

ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7? (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ])

2013-08-28 Thread Vineet Gupta
Hi David, On 06/26/2013 04:59 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 23:41 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Davidlohr Bueso >> wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 18:10 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> [...] >>> I did some more testing with Linux-Testing-P

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]

2013-06-25 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 23:41 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Davidlohr Bueso > wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 18:10 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > [...] > > > >> I did some more testing with Linux-Testing-Project (release: > >> ltp-full-20130503) and next-20130624 (Mo

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]

2013-06-25 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 18:10 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: [...] > I did some more testing with Linux-Testing-Project (release: > ltp-full-20130503) and next-20130624 (Monday) which has still the > issue, here. > > If I revert the mentioned two commits from my local > revert-ipc-next20130624-5089fd1c6

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]

2013-06-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Davidlohr Bueso > wrote: >> On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 21:34 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell >>> wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > Happy solstice! >>> > >>> > Chan

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]

2013-06-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 00:54 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Davidlohr Bueso >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 21:34 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]

2013-06-21 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 00:54 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Davidlohr Bueso > wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 21:34 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell > >> wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > Happy solstice! > >> > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]

2013-06-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 21:34 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Happy solstice! >> > >> > Changes since 20130620: >> > >> > Dropped tree: mailbox (really bad me

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]

2013-06-21 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 21:34 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Happy solstice! > > > > Changes since 20130620: > > > > Dropped tree: mailbox (really bad merge conflicts with the arm-soc tree) > > > > The net-next tree gained

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 [ BROKEN ipc/ipc-msg ]

2013-06-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Happy solstice! > > Changes since 20130620: > > Dropped tree: mailbox (really bad merge conflicts with the arm-soc tree) > > The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. > > The leds tree still had its build fail