linux-next: Tree for Jun 5

2020-06-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, News: there will be no linux-release on Monday and (probably) Tuesday. News: The merge window has opened, so please do *not* add v5.9 material to your linux-next included branches until after v5.8-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20200604: Linus' tree gained a build failure for whic

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (staging/media/imx/)

2019-06-05 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Randy, On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:37 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: > on x86_64: > > ld: drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-internal-sd.o: in function > `imx_media_register_ipu_internal_subdevs': > imx-media-internal-sd.c:(.text+0xd1): undefined reference to `ipu_get_num' Thanks for reporting this p

linux-next: Tree for Jun 5

2019-06-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190604: The tpmdd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20190504. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3901 4307 files changed, 159819 insertions(+), 159401 deletions(-) --

linux-next: Tree for Jun 5

2018-06-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180604: The xfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The net-next tree still had its build failure for which I disabled BPFILTER. The drm-msm tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 10150 9691 files changed, 435588 insertions(+)

linux-next: Tree for Jun 5

2017-06-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170602: New tree: uuid The at91 tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The clk tree gained a build failure, so I used the version from next-20170602. The v4l-dvb tree gained a conflict against the v4l-dvb-fixes tree. The drm tree gained a conflict against Lin

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5

2015-06-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Michael, On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 00:07:33 +1000 Michael Ellerman wrote: > > So as Stephen said in his earlier email I did the linux-next merge today as a > test run for when he's on vacation. Thanks for that - you persisted longer that I would have :-) > Also note the tree has moved, until I get

linux-next: Tree for Jun 5

2015-06-05 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi all, So as Stephen said in his earlier email I did the linux-next merge today as a test run for when he's on vacation. It went OK to begin with though things got a little hairy toward the end. So if there's odd build breaks or bad merges that's my fault. Also note the tree has moved, until I

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (mmc/host/usdhi6ro10.c)

2014-06-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 06/05/2014 02:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. > > Our build server is down today, so this linux-next will not get the > usual builds done, sorry. > > Changes since 20140604: > > > The mmc tree lost its build failure. bu

linux-next: Tree for Jun 5

2014-06-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. Our build server is down today, so this linux-next will not get the usual builds done, sorry. Changes since 20140604: Removed tree: arm64-hugepages (finished with) The net-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The dr

linux-next: Tree for Jun 5

2013-06-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130604: The staging tree still has its build failure. The msm tree still has its build failure. I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linu