linux-next: Tree for Jun 6

Hi all, Changes since 20190605: The hwmon-fixes tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The hwmon-staging tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The v4l-dvb tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the bpf tree. The tpmdd

linux-next: Tree for Jun 6

Hi all, Note: please do *not* add any v4.19 material to your linux-next included branches until after v4.18-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20180605: The net-next tree lost its build failure but gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The staging tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.

linux-next: Tree for Jun 6

Hi all, Note: please do *not* add any v4.19 material to your linux-next included branches until after v4.18-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20180605: The net-next tree lost its build failure but gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The staging tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.

linux-next: Tree for Jun 6

Hi all, Changes since 20170605: The clk tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The mfd tree lost its build failure. The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree):

linux-next: Tree for Jun 6

Hi all, Changes since 20170605: The clk tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The mfd tree lost its build failure. The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree):

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (scsi_debug.c)

On 08/23/16 16:22, Masanari Iida wrote: > This one still exist on linus's tree (as of v4.8-rc3). > > CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh > CHK kernel/config_data.h > Building modules, stage 2. > MODPOST 720 modules > ERROR: "ip_compute_csum" [drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.ko] undefined! >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (scsi_debug.c)

On 08/23/16 16:22, Masanari Iida wrote: > This one still exist on linus's tree (as of v4.8-rc3). > > CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh > CHK kernel/config_data.h > Building modules, stage 2. > MODPOST 720 modules > ERROR: "ip_compute_csum" [drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.ko] undefined! >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (scsi_debug.c)

This one still exist on linus's tree (as of v4.8-rc3). CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK kernel/config_data.h Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 720 modules ERROR: "ip_compute_csum" [drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.ko] undefined! scripts/Makefile.modpost:91: recipe for target '__modpost'

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (scsi_debug.c)

This one still exist on linus's tree (as of v4.8-rc3). CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK kernel/config_data.h Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 720 modules ERROR: "ip_compute_csum" [drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.ko] undefined! scripts/Makefile.modpost:91: recipe for target '__modpost'

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (mm/slub.c)

Hi Andrew, On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:12:42 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:11:37 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20160603: > > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (mm/slub.c)

Hi Andrew, On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:12:42 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:11:37 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20160603: > > > > > > > on i386: > > > > mm/built-in.o: In function

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (mm/slub.c)

On 06/07/16 13:12, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:11:37 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20160603: >>> >> >> on i386: >> >> mm/built-in.o: In function `init_cache_random_seq': >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (mm/slub.c)

On 06/07/16 13:12, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:11:37 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20160603: >>> >> >> on i386: >> >> mm/built-in.o: In function `init_cache_random_seq': >> slub.c:(.text+0x76921):

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (mm/slub.c)

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:11:37 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160603: > > > > on i386: > > mm/built-in.o: In function `init_cache_random_seq': > slub.c:(.text+0x76921): undefined reference to

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (mm/slub.c)

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:11:37 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160603: > > > > on i386: > > mm/built-in.o: In function `init_cache_random_seq': > slub.c:(.text+0x76921): undefined reference to `cache_random_seq_create' >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (mm/slub.c)

On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160603: > on i386: mm/built-in.o: In function `init_cache_random_seq': slub.c:(.text+0x76921): undefined reference to `cache_random_seq_create' mm/built-in.o: In function `__kmem_cache_release': (.text+0x80525): undefined

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (mm/slub.c)

On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160603: > on i386: mm/built-in.o: In function `init_cache_random_seq': slub.c:(.text+0x76921): undefined reference to `cache_random_seq_create' mm/built-in.o: In function `__kmem_cache_release': (.text+0x80525): undefined

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (scsi_debug.c)

On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160603: on x86_64: ERROR: "ip_compute_csum" [drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.ko] undefined! CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM doesn't seem to exist for x86, so lib/checksum.o is not built. -- ~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 6 (scsi_debug.c)

On 06/05/16 21:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160603: on x86_64: ERROR: "ip_compute_csum" [drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.ko] undefined! CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM doesn't seem to exist for x86, so lib/checksum.o is not built. -- ~Randy

linux-next: Tree for Jun 6

Hi all, Changes since 20160603: New tree: amlogic Dropped tree: amlogic (build failure) My fixes tree contains: of: silence warnings due to max() usage The amlogic tree gained a build failure so I dropped it for today. The samsung-krzk tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The

linux-next: Tree for Jun 6

Hi all, Changes since 20160603: New tree: amlogic Dropped tree: amlogic (build failure) My fixes tree contains: of: silence warnings due to max() usage The amlogic tree gained a build failure so I dropped it for today. The samsung-krzk tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The

linux-next: Tree for Jun 6

Hi all, NEWS: I am now using v4.9.0 cross compilers to do my builds during the day - not my over night builds yet (see https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.9.0/). The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. Our over night build server is down today, so

linux-next: Tree for Jun 6

Hi all, NEWS: I am now using v4.9.0 cross compilers to do my builds during the day - not my over night builds yet (see https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.9.0/). The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. Our over night build server is down today, so