Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 13

2018-03-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dominik, On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:52:05 +0100 Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > would it be possible to have > >https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brodo/linux.git > syscalls-next > > added to -next? This will probably only be for one or two release cycles, > but it might easen th

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 13

2018-03-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mike, On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:57:40 -0400 Mike Snitzer wrote: > > I had to revert the following commits to get this kernel to build > (otherwise I got macro expansion errors, using RHEL7 > gcc-4.8.5-28.el7.x86_64): Yeah, I reported that earlier (216 of my 244 builds failed - gcc 4.6.3) > beb7

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 13

2018-03-13 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > I had to revert the following commits to get this kernel to build > (otherwise I got macro expansion errors, using RHEL7 > gcc-4.8.5-28.el7.x86_64): > > beb7eb2 kernelh-skip-single-eval-logic-on-literals-in-min-max-v3 > 19ff7e5 kernelh-skip-si

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 13

2018-03-13 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/13/2018 08:57 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > I had to revert the following commits to get this kernel to build > (otherwise I got macro expansion errors, using RHEL7 > gcc-4.8.5-28.el7.x86_64): > > beb7eb2 kernelh-skip-single-eval-logic-on-literals-in-min-max-v3 > 19ff7e5 kernelh-skip-single-eval

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 13

2018-03-13 Thread Mike Snitzer
I had to revert the following commits to get this kernel to build (otherwise I got macro expansion errors, using RHEL7 gcc-4.8.5-28.el7.x86_64): beb7eb2 kernelh-skip-single-eval-logic-on-literals-in-min-max-v3 19ff7e5 kernelh-skip-single-eval-logic-on-literals-in-min-max-v2 c7c133f kernel.h: skip

linux-next: Tree for Mar 13

2018-03-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180309: Removed tree: cris (the architecture is being removed) The qcom tree gained a conflict against the amlogic tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree. The drm tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree and a build failure for which I reverted

linux-next: Tree for Mar 13

2015-03-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150312: The vfs tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the vfs tree. The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. The akpm-current tree gained conflicts against the vfs tree and a build failure for which I

linux-next: Tree for Mar 13

2014-03-13 Thread Mark Brown
Hi all, I've uploaded -next for today. There were no new issues today and no trees needed reverting. This build has been tested with ARM multi_v7_defconfig and x86 allmodconfig between each merge. Thanks, Mark signature.asc Description: Digital signature

linux-next: Tree for Mar 13

2013-03-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130312: The input tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree lost its conflict. The drm-intel still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The trivial tree gained a conflict against the virtio tree. The gpio tree still had its build failure for which