Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 30 (drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm63[256]8.o)

2021-03-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 3/30/21 1:27 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday or the following > Monday. > > Changes since 20210329: > on x86_64: # CONFIG_OF is not set ld: drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm6328.o: in function `pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin'

linux-next: Tree for Mar 30

2021-03-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday or the following Monday. Changes since 20210329: The amdgpu tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20210329. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7665 7592 files changed, 449869 insertions(+), 154144 delet

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 30

2017-03-30 Thread Leonard Crestez
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 16:55 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20170329: > > Undropped tree: xen-tip > > The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The drm tree gained conflicts against the drm-intel-fixes tree. > > The mailbox tree lost its build failure.

linux-next: Tree for Mar 30

2017-03-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170329: Undropped tree: xen-tip The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The drm tree gained conflicts against the drm-intel-fixes tree. The mailbox tree lost its build failure. The phy-next tree gained a build failure, so I used the version from next-201703

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 30 (lockdep.c)

2016-03-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/29/16 18:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160329: > on x86_64: kernel/built-in.o: In function `___create_rcu_laclass_proc': lockdep.c:(.init.text+0x1195): undefined reference to `create_laclass_proc' Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy # # Automatical

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 30 (waketorture.c)

2016-03-30 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:56:47AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 03/29/16 18:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160329: > > > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > waketorture.c:(.text+0x5d578): undefined reference to `trace_clock_global' > waketorture.c:(.text+0x5d731): un

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 30 (waketorture.c)

2016-03-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/29/16 18:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160329: > on i386 or x86_64: waketorture.c:(.text+0x5d578): undefined reference to `trace_clock_global' waketorture.c:(.text+0x5d731): undefined reference to `trace_clock_local' waketorture.c:(.text+0x5d765): undefined re

linux-next: Tree for Mar 30

2016-03-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160329: My fixes tree contains: perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc The drm-misc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The rcu tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The nvdimm tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 15

linux-next: Tree for Mar 30

2015-03-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150327: The arm64 tree has lost its build failures. The vfs tree lost its build failure. The idle tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150327. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the vfs tree and a build failure due to a bad merge for whi