Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-04-01 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 04/01/2015 01:08 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:17:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 03/31/2015 04:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: You need 3.17 kernel headers to have memfd_create, not much the kdbus test code can do about that. You might want to update t

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-04-01 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:17:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 03/31/2015 04:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >You need 3.17 kernel headers to have memfd_create, not much the kdbus > >test code can do about that. You might want to update the kernel > >headers for these build boxes. > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Daniel Mack
On 04/01/2015 04:45 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 03/31/2015 07:24 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> Now I am left with the question if the samples build should be >> masked for alpha and mips, or if I should drop building samples >> from my 'allmodconfig' builds. I think I'll do the latter; >> there se

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Max Filippov
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > xtensa > > Lots of 'dangerous relocation: l32r: literal placed after use' all over the > place, causing all xtensa builds to fail. > > Introduced by commit 779c88c94c34 ("ARM: 8321/1: asm-generic: introduce > .text.fixup input section"). I

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/31/2015 08:01 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 19:18 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 03/31/2015 04:24 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 01:07 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: alpha:allmodconfi

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 19:18 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 03/31/2015 04:24 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 01:07 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>> alpha:allmodconfig > >>> mips:allmodconfig > >>> > >>>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/31/2015 07:24 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 03/31/2015 04:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Greg, On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:07:49 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: alpha:allmodconfig mips:allmodconfig samples/kdbus/kdbus-worker

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/31/2015 04:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Greg, On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:07:49 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: alpha:allmodconfig mips:allmodconfig samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c: In function ‘prime_new’: samples/kdbus/kd

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/31/2015 04:24 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 01:07 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: alpha:allmodconfig mips:allmodconfig samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c: In function ‘prime_new’: samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/31/2015 04:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:02:21AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150330: The arm64 tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The idle tree gained a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:07:49 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > alpha:allmodconfig > > mips:allmodconfig > > > > samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c: In function ‘prime_new’: > > samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c:930:18: erro

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 01:07 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > alpha:allmodconfig > > mips:allmodconfig > > > > samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c: In function ‘prime_new’: > > samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c:930:18: error: ‘__NR_memfd_cr

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:02:21AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20150330: > > > > The arm64 tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. > > > > The idle tree gained a build failure so I used

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits)

2015-03-31 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:02:21AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150330: > > The arm64 tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. > > The idle tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > next-20150327. > > The tip tree gained conflicts against t