linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2021-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210304: The tty tree gained a conflict against the powerpc-fixes tree. The pinctrl tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1820 1789 files changed, 45567 insertions(+), 33563 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2019-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any code destined for v5.2 to your linux-next included branches until after v5.1-rc1 has been released. News: I will not be doing linux-next releases from next Thursday (Mar 7) to the following Friday (Mar 15). Sorry this happened to fall across most of the merge

linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2018-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180302: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. The selinux tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4722 5201 files changed, 199378 insertions(+),

linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2018-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180302: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. The selinux tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4722 5201 files changed, 199378 insertions(+),

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (iwlwifi/mvm)

2015-03-06 Thread Emmanuel Grumbach
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 03/04/15 19:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20150304: >> > > on i386, when IWLWIFI_DEBUGFS is not enabled: > > > ../drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/phy-ctxt.c:179:38: error: 'struct > iwl_mvm' has no member

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (iwlwifi/mvm)

2015-03-06 Thread Emmanuel Grumbach
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: On 03/04/15 19:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150304: on i386, when IWLWIFI_DEBUGFS is not enabled: ../drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/phy-ctxt.c:179:38: error: 'struct iwl_mvm' has no

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (iwlwifi/mvm)

2015-03-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/04/15 19:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150304: > on i386, when IWLWIFI_DEBUGFS is not enabled: ../drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/phy-ctxt.c:179:38: error: 'struct iwl_mvm' has no member named 'dbgfs_rx_phyinfo'

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (iwlwifi/mvm)

2015-03-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 03/04/15 19:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150304: on i386, when IWLWIFI_DEBUGFS is not enabled: ../drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/phy-ctxt.c:179:38: error: 'struct iwl_mvm' has no member named 'dbgfs_rx_phyinfo'

linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2015-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150304: The net-next tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. The md tree lost its build failure. The mfd tree lost its build failure. The clk tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2570 2666 files changed, 81615

linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2015-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150304: The net-next tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. The md tree lost its build failure. The mfd tree lost its build failure. The clk tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2570 2666 files changed, 81615

linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2014-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140304: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The mfd-lj tree lost its build failure. The wireless-next tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20140224. The gpio tree

linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2014-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140304: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The mfd-lj tree lost its build failure. The wireless-next tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20140224. The gpio tree

linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2013-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130304: New tree: usb-gadget The pm tree lost its build failure. The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The gpio tree lost its build failure. The akpm tree still had its 2 build failures for which I reverted 2 commits and lost a patch that turned up

linux-next: Tree for Mar 5

2013-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130304: New tree: usb-gadget The pm tree lost its build failure. The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The gpio tree lost its build failure. The akpm tree still had its 2 build failures for which I reverted 2 commits and lost a patch that turned up