Hi all,
Changes since 20200430:
The qcom tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The btrfs tree gained conflicts against the btrfs-fixes tree.
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and kspp-gustavo trees.
The drm tree gained a conflict against the drm-misc-
Hi all,
Changes since 20190430:
The input tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The kvm-ppc tree gained a conflict against the kvm-arm tree.
The staging tree gained a conflict against the block tree.
The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the tip tree.
Non-merge commits (r
Hi all,
Changes since 20180430:
The rdma tree gained a conflict against the rdma-fixes tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3348
3188 files changed, 126791 insertions(+), 59113 deletions(-)
I have creat
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.13 destined material in your linux-next
included branches until after v4.12-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20170428:
The spi tree gained a conflict against the pm tree.
The rcu tree gained a conflict against the ftrace tree.
The staging tree gained a conf
Hi all,
Changes since 20150430:
The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure.
The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I apllied a
fix patch.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1233
1252 files changed, 78167 insertions(+), 22093 deletions(-)
-
Hi all,
This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140430:
The powerpc tree still had its build failure.
The pm tree gained a conflict against the mips tree.
The mfd-lj tree lost its build failure.
The staging tree gained a conflict against the sta
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 09:59:50PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Ezequiel, All,
>
> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 02:21:44PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > I'm trying to split the ac97 support into a separate module.
> > So far I've managed to do this with two different approaches,
> > but both of th
Ezequiel, All,
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 02:21:44PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> I'm trying to split the ac97 support into a separate module.
> So far I've managed to do this with two different approaches,
> but both of them are broken in some way :-(
>
> Couple questions:
>
> 1. Is it possible
Hi Mauro,
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:52:33AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> > is unreliable (doesn't do what some people expect) when SND=m and
> > SND_AC97_CODEC=m,
> > since VIDEO_STK1160_AC97 is a bool.
>
> Using select is always tricky.
>
> I can see a few possible fixes for it:
On 05/02/13 07:52, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> [media] stk1160: Make stk1160 module if SND is m and audio support is selected
>
> As reported by Randy:
>
> When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and
> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y
> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In funct
Em 01-05-2013 14:59, Randy Dunlap escreveu:
On 05/01/13 01:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
Changes since 20130430:
When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and
CONFIG_
On 05/02/2013 09:37 AM, ZX wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 May 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
>> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
>>
>> Changes since 20130430:
>>
>> The nfsd tree lost its build failure.
>>
On 05/01/13 13:53, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Randy, All,
>
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 01:23:25PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/01/13 12:58, David Rientjes wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 May 2013, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>>>
> When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and
> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y
Randy, All,
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 01:23:25PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/01/13 12:58, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 May 2013, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> >
> >>> When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and
> >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y
> >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y
> >>>
> >>>
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and
> >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y
> >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y
> >>>
> >>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register':
> >>> (.text+0x122706): undefined reference to `snd_card_create'
> >>>
On 05/01/13 12:58, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2013, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>
>>> When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and
>>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y
>>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y
>>>
>>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register':
>>> (.text+0x122706): undefined re
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and
> > CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y
> > CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y
> >
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register':
> > (.text+0x122706): undefined reference to `snd_card_create'
> > drivers/bui
On 05/01/13 12:28, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/01/13 01:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
>>> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
>>>
>>> Cha
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/01/13 01:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
> > branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
> >
> > Changes since 20130430:
> >
>
>
> When CO
On 05/01/13 01:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
>
> Changes since 20130430:
>
When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and
CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y
CONFIG_VIDEO_STK11
Hi all,
Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
Changes since 20130430:
The nfsd tree lost its build failure.
The xfs tree lost its build failure.
The vfs tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the powerpc trees and
ga
21 matches
Mail list logo
