On 04.05.20 23:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:44:10 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>
>> Ho Christian,
>>
>> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Mike,
>>> commit 51a2f644fd020d5f090044825c388444d11029d ("mm: free_area_init:
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:44:10 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> Ho Christian,
>
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Mike,
> > commit 51a2f644fd020d5f090044825c388444d11029d ("mm: free_area_init: allow
> > defining max_zone_pfn in descending order")
Ho Christian,
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Mike,
> commit 51a2f644fd020d5f090044825c388444d11029d ("mm: free_area_init: allow
> defining max_zone_pfn in descending order")
> does increase the memory use on s390 (e.g. 700 MB vs.1.8 GB).
>
> Something
Mike,
commit 51a2f644fd020d5f090044825c388444d11029d ("mm: free_area_init: allow
defining max_zone_pfn in descending order")
does increase the memory use on s390 (e.g. 700 MB vs.1.8 GB).
Something is odd in this patch. Any idea?
4 matches
Mail list logo