Hi all,
Changes since 20200507:
New tree: smack
My fixes tree contains:
bbefc924d0ff ("ubsan: disable UBSAN_ALIGNMENT under COMPILE_TEST")
7cb1d38f52b1 ("drm/msm: Fix undefined "rd_full" link error")
41ef83a65305 ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning")
d58ae1991898 ("ipmr: Add
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:06 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:15 AM Rajat Jain wrote:
>
> > OK, NP. Just to be sure I understand,
> >
> > 1) Please let me know if I should send in a fix (it would be
> > #include/linux/module.h and also add MODULE_LICENSE() I belie
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:15 AM Rajat Jain wrote:
> OK, NP. Just to be sure I understand,
>
> 1) Please let me know if I should send in a fix (it would be
> #include/linux/module.h and also add MODULE_LICENSE() I believe)?
> 2) Would this be lined up for next version though?
Resend a complete ser
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Wed, May 8, 2019 at 2:22 PM
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing
List, Rajat Jain, Platform Driver, Rajneesh Bhardwaj, Vishwanath
Somayaji
> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:45 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > On 5/8/19 12:34 AM,
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:45 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 5/8/19 12:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20190507:
> >
> > The ubifs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> >
>
> on i386 or x86_64:
Thank you for report. Can you provide what is the config option
On 5/8/19 12:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190507:
>
> The ubifs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>
on i386 or x86_64:
CC drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_drv.o
../drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_drv.c:40:1: warning: data
defi
On 5/8/19 12:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190507:
>
> The ubifs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>
Hi Mauro,
Commit 6159e12e11770fb25e748af90f6c5206c1df09ee:
media: meye: allow building it with COMPILE_TEST on non-x86
causes a build failure when
CON
Hi all,
Changes since 20190507:
The ubifs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 8636
7735 files changed, 401006 insertions(+), 138739 deletions(-)
I have created tod
On 05/07/2018 10:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180507:
>
on x86_64:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for TYPEC_TCPCI
Depends on [n]: STAGING [=y] && TYPEC_TCPM [=y] && I2C [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- TYPEC_RT1711H [=y] && STAGING [=y] && TYPEC_TCPM [=
Hi all,
Changes since 20180507:
The pci tree gained a conflict against the dma-mapping tree.
The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against the s390 tree.
The drm-intel tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with
the dma-mapping tree for which I applied a merge fix patch.
Non-merge com
On 05/07/17 21:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
on i386:
fs/built-in.o: In function `ovl_lookup':
(.text+0x8e1d4): undefined reference to `exportfs_decode_fh'
fs/built-in.o: In function `ovl_copy_up_locked':
copy_up.c:(.text+0x93484): undefined reference to `exportfs_encode_fh'
CONFIG_
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.13 destined material in your linux-next
included branches until after v4.12-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20170505:
The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2723
2661 files changed, 96043 i
Hi all,
Changes since 20150507:
New tree : rtc
The ext4 tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20150506.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2631
2535 files changed, 117241 insertions(+), 49326 deletions(-)
---
Mark, Vinod,
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build
> and also the celleb_defconfig.
>
> Changes since 20140507:
>
> The powerpc tree still had its build failure.
>
> Non-merge commits (relative
Hi all,
This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build
and also the celleb_defconfig.
Changes since 20140507:
The powerpc tree still had its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4132
3871 files changed, 137526 insertions(+), 86247 deletions(-)
--
Hi,
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 12:45 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> [resending since mail server dropped it]
>
> On 05/13/13 12:34, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 05/13/13 12:31, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 05/13/13 09:30, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> On 05/13/13 02:18, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
> >>
[resending since mail server dropped it]
On 05/13/13 12:34, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/13/13 12:31, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/13/13 09:30, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 05/13/13 02:18, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:08 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/0
On 05/13/13 02:18, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:08 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/09/13 09:50, David Teigland wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
[Just forwarding to David ...]
On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:08 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/09/13 09:50, David Teigland wrote:
> > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> [Just forwarding to David ...]
> >>
> >> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> on x86
On 05/09/13 09:50, David Teigland wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> [Just forwarding to David ...]
>>
>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> on x86_64:
>>>
>>> when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m:
>>>
>>> fs/
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> [Just forwarding to David ...]
>
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > on x86_64:
> >
> > when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m:
> >
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `gfs2_lock':
> > file.c
[Just forwarding to David ...]
On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> on x86_64:
>
> when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m:
>
> fs/built-in.o: In function `gfs2_lock':
> file.c:(.text+0xa512c): undefined reference to `dlm_posix_get'
> file.c:(.text+0xa5140): und
On 05/07/13 21:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
>
> I am receiving a (un)reasonable number of conflicts from there being
> multiple copies of some commits in various trees.
On 05/07/13 21:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
>
> I am receiving a (un)reasonable number of conflicts from there being
> multiple copies of some commits in various trees.
Hi all,
Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
I am receiving a (un)reasonable number of conflicts from there being
multiple copies of some commits in various trees. Please clean this up
and resist the temptataion to reb
25 matches
Mail list logo