Hi,
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 12:45 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> [resending since mail server dropped it]
>
> On 05/13/13 12:34, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 05/13/13 12:31, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 05/13/13 09:30, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> On 05/13/13 02:18, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
> >>
[resending since mail server dropped it]
On 05/13/13 12:34, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/13/13 12:31, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/13/13 09:30, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 05/13/13 02:18, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:08 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/0
On 05/13/13 02:18, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:08 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/09/13 09:50, David Teigland wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
[Just forwarding to David ...]
On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:08 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/09/13 09:50, David Teigland wrote:
> > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> [Just forwarding to David ...]
> >>
> >> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> on x86
On 05/09/13 09:50, David Teigland wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> [Just forwarding to David ...]
>>
>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> on x86_64:
>>>
>>> when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m:
>>>
>>> fs/
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> [Just forwarding to David ...]
>
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > on x86_64:
> >
> > when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m:
> >
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `gfs2_lock':
> > file.c
[Just forwarding to David ...]
On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> on x86_64:
>
> when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m:
>
> fs/built-in.o: In function `gfs2_lock':
> file.c:(.text+0xa512c): undefined reference to `dlm_posix_get'
> file.c:(.text+0xa5140): und
On 05/07/13 21:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
>
> I am receiving a (un)reasonable number of conflicts from there being
> multiple copies of some commits in various trees.
8 matches
Mail list logo