linux-next: Tree for May 9

2019-05-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190508: The jc_docs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The mfd tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The akpm-current tree gained conflicts against the rdma and parisc-hd trees. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5622 4856 files changed, 218813

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 9 (mlx5)

2018-05-09 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 08:31 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/09/2018 04:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20180508: > > > > on x86_64: > # CONFIG_SMP is not set > > In file included from > ../drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c:43:0: > ../include/linu

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 9 (mlx5)

2018-05-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/09/2018 04:21 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20180508: > on x86_64: # CONFIG_SMP is not set In file included from ../drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c:43:0: ../include/linux/mlx5/driver.h: In function 'mlx5_get_vector_affinity_hint': ../include/linux/

linux-next: Tree for May 9

2018-05-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180508: New tree: mediatek The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree. The nvdimm tree gained a conflict against the jc_docs tree. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the jc_docs tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4827 4713 fil

linux-next: Tree for May 9

2017-05-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.13 destined material in your linux-next included branches until after v4.12-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20170508: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2374 2523 files changed, 83999 insertions(+), 42709 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for May 9

2016-05-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160506: Dropped tree: hsi (at the maintainer's request) The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the ext4 tree. The libata tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20160506 for today. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the wireless-drivers and

linux-next: Tree for May 9

2014-05-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build and also the celleb_defconfig. Changes since 20140508: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The bluetooth tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The crypto tree gained conflicts against the crypto-curr

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 9

2013-05-09 Thread Xiong Zhou
On Thu, 9 May 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included > branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. > > Changes since 20130508: > > The microblaze tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree > > The regmap tree gained a

linux-next: Tree for May 9

2013-05-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. Changes since 20130508: The microblaze tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree The regmap tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree The vhost tree gained a conflict aga