Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
until after the merge window closes.
Changes since 20181031:
My fixes tree contains this:
"drivers: net: include linux/ip.h for iphdr"
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 790
953 files changed, 41712 in
On 11/02/2015 03:34 PM, Matias Bjorling wrote:
On 11/02/2015 04:37 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 11/02/2015 05:43 AM, Matias Bjorling wrote:
On 11/02/2015 02:16 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me?
On 11/02/2015 04:37 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 05:43 AM, Matias Bjorling wrote:
>> On 11/02/2015 02:16 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
Changes since 20
Dne 2.11.2015 v 20:23 Thiago Macieira napsal(a):
> On Monday 02 November 2015 10:48:00 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Hi,
>> What does this patch apply to?
>> I can't apply it cleanly to to 4.3 or linux-next of yesterday or today.
>
> Hmm... interesting, it doesn't apply on linux-next. The reason for that
On Monday 02 November 2015 10:48:00 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi,
> What does this patch apply to?
> I can't apply it cleanly to to 4.3 or linux-next of yesterday or today.
Hmm... interesting, it doesn't apply on linux-next. The reason for that is
that the code on linux-next is different from the one
On 11/02/15 08:58, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 02 November 2015 08:44:01 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> Randy, we need a backtrace. The problem is on the function that called
>>> first(). Can you make sure the crash generates a core dump, then get the
>>> bt
>>> from that?
>>
>> ASSERT: "!isEmpty()
On Monday 02 November 2015 08:44:01 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Randy, we need a backtrace. The problem is on the function that called
> > first(). Can you make sure the crash generates a core dump, then get the
> > bt
> > from that?
>
> ASSERT: "!isEmpty()" in file /usr/include/QtCore/qlist.h, line 2
On 11/02/15 05:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 02 November 2015 14:39:16 Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 2015-11-02 04:11, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
>>>
Changes sin
On 11/02/15 05:39, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2015-11-02 04:11, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
>>>
>>> Changes since 20151022:
>>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> 'make xconfig' dies a quick
On 11/02/2015 05:43 AM, Matias Bjorling wrote:
On 11/02/2015 02:16 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
Changes since 20151022:
on i386:
../include/linux/lightnvm.h:143:4: error: width o
On Monday 02 November 2015 14:39:16 Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2015-11-02 04:11, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
> >
> >> Changes since 20151022:
> > on x86_64:
> >
> > 'make
On 2015-11-02 04:11, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
>>
>> Changes since 20151022:
>>
>
> on x86_64:
>
> 'make xconfig' dies a quick death when I try to use it:
>
> linux-next-20151
On 11/02/2015 02:16 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
>>
>> Changes since 20151022:
>>
>
> on i386:
>
> ../include/linux/lightnvm.h:143:4: error: width of 'resved' exceeds its type
Hi Stephen,
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
With all these maintainers showing you fake smiles at Kernel Summit :-)
This only proves how much value your work brings! Thanks a lot!
If I have to answer the
On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
>
> Changes since 20151022:
>
on x86_64:
'make xconfig' dies a quick death when I try to use it:
linux-next-20151101> ASSERT: "!isEmpty()" in file /usr/include/QtCore/qlis
On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
>
> Changes since 20151022:
>
on i386:
../include/linux/lightnvm.h:143:4: error: width of 'resved' exceeds its type
# CONFIG_LBDAF is not set
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscrib
Hi all,
I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
Changes since 20151022:
New trees: usb-chipidea-fixes, usb-chipidea-next
Removed tree: kdbus (temporarily at the maintainer's request)
The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The arm64 tree gained a co
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Changes since 20131031:
> > >
> > > The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> > > n
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:20:42PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Changes since 20131031:
> > > >
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20131031:
> >
> > The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> > next-20131031.
> >
> > The block tree gained conflicts against th
On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20131031:
>
> The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20131031.
>
> The block tree gained conflicts against the f2fs, aio-direct and Linus'
> trees and a build failure and generated several
Hi all,
Changes since 20131031:
The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20131031.
The block tree gained conflicts against the f2fs, aio-direct and Linus'
trees and a build failure and generated several warnings so I used the
version from next-20131031.
The dt-rh
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:18:47AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 10:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > New trees: rr-fixes and swiotlb
> >
> > Changes since 20121031:
> >
>
>
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:109:0: warning: "xen_pvh_domain" redefined
> include/xen/xen
On 10/31/2012 10:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> New trees: rr-fixes and swiotlb
>
> Changes since 20121031:
>
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:109:0: warning: "xen_pvh_domain" redefined
include/xen/xen.h:23:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
Full randconfig file i
Hi all,
New trees: rr-fixes and swiotlb
Changes since 20121031:
The v4l-dvb tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20121026.
The tmem tree gained conflicts against the xen-two tree.
The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere.
25 matches
Mail list logo
