Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (xen_swiotllb)

2013-11-04 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20131031: > > > > > > The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (xen_swiotllb)

2013-11-04 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:20:42PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Changes since 20131031: > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (xen_swiotllb)

2013-11-04 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:20:42PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20131031: The squashfs

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (xen_swiotllb)

2013-11-04 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20131031: The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20131031.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (xen_swiotllb)

2013-11-01 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20131031: > > > > The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > > next-20131031. > > > > The block tree gained conflicts against

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (xen_swiotllb)

2013-11-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20131031: > > The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > next-20131031. > > The block tree gained conflicts against the f2fs, aio-direct and Linus' > trees and a build failure and generated several

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (xen_swiotllb)

2013-11-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20131031: The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20131031. The block tree gained conflicts against the f2fs, aio-direct and Linus' trees and a build failure and generated several warnings

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (xen_swiotllb)

2013-11-01 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 11:16:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 11/01/13 01:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20131031: The squashfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20131031. The block tree gained conflicts against the f2fs,