linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Changes since 2020: The drivers-memory tree still had its build failure. The mac80211-next tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4823 5042 files changed, 519831 insertions(+), 79842 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Changes since 20181109: The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against the bpf tree. The tip tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2463 2629 files changed, 104084 insertions(+), 92260 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Changes since 20181109: The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against the bpf tree. The tip tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2463 2629 files changed, 104084 insertions(+), 92260 deletions(-)

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 12 (staging/unisys/visorinput)

Hi Randy, On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:05:26 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/11/15 18:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do *not* add any material intended for v4.5 to your linux-next > > included branches until after v4.4-rc1 has been released. > > > > Changes since

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 12 (staging/unisys/visorinput)

On 11/11/15 18:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do *not* add any material intended for v4.5 to your linux-next > included branches until after v4.4-rc1 has been released. > > Changes since 2015: > > *cickets* eh?? on x86_64: ERROR: "input_event"

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 12 (staging/unisys/visorinput)

Hi Randy, On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:05:26 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 11/11/15 18:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do *not* add any material intended for v4.5 to your linux-next > > included branches until after v4.4-rc1 has been released. > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 12 (staging/unisys/visorinput)

On 11/11/15 18:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do *not* add any material intended for v4.5 to your linux-next > included branches until after v4.4-rc1 has been released. > > Changes since 2015: > > *cickets* eh?? on x86_64: ERROR: "input_event"

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Please do *not* add any material intended for v4.5 to your linux-next included branches until after v4.4-rc1 has been released. Changes since 2015: *cickets* Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1011 1017 files changed, 39133 insertions(+), 17680 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Please do *not* add any material intended for v4.5 to your linux-next included branches until after v4.4-rc1 has been released. Changes since 2015: *cickets* Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1011 1017 files changed, 39133 insertions(+), 17680 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Changes since 2014: The slave-dma tree lost its build failure. The block tree lost its build failure. The mfd tree lost its build failure. The driver-core tree gained a conflict against the hwmon-staging tree. The akpm-current tree still had its build failures for which I applied

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Changes since 2014: The slave-dma tree lost its build failure. The block tree lost its build failure. The mfd tree lost its build failure. The driver-core tree gained a conflict against the hwmon-staging tree. The akpm-current tree still had its build failures for which I applied

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Please do *not* add any v3.14 material to linux-next until after v3.13-rc1 is released. Changes since 2013: The input tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The random tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree.

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Please do *not* add any v3.14 material to linux-next until after v3.13-rc1 is released. Changes since 2013: The input tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The random tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree.

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Changes since 20121109: The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure but gained another so I used the version from next-20121026. The pinctrl tree gained a conflict against the slave-dma tree. The akpm tree lost most of its build failures but I have still reverted a few patches. It also

linux-next: Tree for Nov 12

Hi all, Changes since 20121109: The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure but gained another so I used the version from next-20121026. The pinctrl tree gained a conflict against the slave-dma tree. The akpm tree lost most of its build failures but I have still reverted a few patches. It also