Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (drivers/edac/igen6_edac.c)

2020-11-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/19/20 9:53 AM, Luck, Tony wrote: >> ../drivers/edac/igen6_edac.c: In function 'ecclog_nmi_handler': >> ../drivers/edac/igen6_edac.c:525:10: error: 'NMI_DONE' undeclared (first use >> in this function); did you mean 'DMI_NONE'? >>return NMI_DONE; > > This driver has a #include > > But

RE: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (drivers/edac/igen6_edac.c)

2020-11-19 Thread Luck, Tony
> ../drivers/edac/igen6_edac.c: In function 'ecclog_nmi_handler': > ../drivers/edac/igen6_edac.c:525:10: error: 'NMI_DONE' undeclared (first use > in this function); did you mean 'DMI_NONE'? >return NMI_DONE; This driver has a #include But inside that file it says: #if

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (drivers/edac/igen6_edac.c)

2020-11-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/18/20 10:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20201118: > on x86_64: ../drivers/edac/igen6_edac.c: In function ‘ecclog_nmi_handler’: ../drivers/edac/igen6_edac.c:525:10: error: ‘NMI_DONE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘DMI_NONE’? return

linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2020-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20201118: The phy-next tree lost its a build failure. The dmaengine tree gained a conflict against the dmaengine-fixes tree. The gpio tree lost its build failure. The mhi tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6286 6273 files changed,

linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2018-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181116: Removed trees: (not updated in more that a year) aio, drm-panel, edac, idle, keys, kvm-mips, lightnvm, nand-fixes, realtek, sunxi-drm, uuid, vfs-miklos The tip tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The akpm tree lost

linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2018-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181116: Removed trees: (not updated in more that a year) aio, drm-panel, edac, idle, keys, kvm-mips, lightnvm, nand-fixes, realtek, sunxi-drm, uuid, vfs-miklos The tip tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The akpm tree lost

linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2015-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20151118: The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The sound-soc tree gained build failures so I used the version from next-20151118. The audit tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1871 1839 files

linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2015-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20151118: The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The sound-soc tree gained build failures so I used the version from next-20151118. The audit tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1871 1839 files

linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2014-11-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20141118: The asm-generic tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The omap_dss2 tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The ipmi tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6937 7030 files changed,

linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2014-11-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20141118: The asm-generic tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The omap_dss2 tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The ipmi tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6937 7030 files changed,

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (mfd/as3722)

2013-11-19 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/18/13 19:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do *not* add any v3.14 material to linux-next until after > > v3.13-rc1 is released. > > > > Changes since 20131118: > > > > on i386: > > when CONFIG_I2C=m > (a.k.a. the dangers

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (mfd/as3722)

2013-11-19 Thread Lee Jones
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 11/18/13 19:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Please do *not* add any v3.14 material to linux-next until after v3.13-rc1 is released. Changes since 20131118: on i386: when CONFIG_I2C=m (a.k.a. the dangers of having a bool

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2013-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Guenter, On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 20:08:54 -0800 Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Merging h8300-remove/h8300-remove (b400126add8f CREDITS: Add Yoshinori Sato > > for h8300) > > This tree has been merged upstream and is no longer needed. Thanks, I will remove it tomorrow. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2013-11-18 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:39:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > Hi Stephen, > Merging h8300-remove/h8300-remove (b400126add8f CREDITS: Add Yoshinori Sato > for h8300) This tree has been merged upstream and is no longer needed. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list:

linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2013-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do *not* add any v3.14 material to linux-next until after v3.13-rc1 is released. Changes since 20131118: The nfs tree lost its build failure but gained another for which I reverted a commit. The gpio tree gained a conflict against the pm tree.

linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2013-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do *not* add any v3.14 material to linux-next until after v3.13-rc1 is released. Changes since 20131118: The nfs tree lost its build failure but gained another for which I reverted a commit. The gpio tree gained a conflict against the pm tree.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2013-11-18 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:39:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Hi Stephen, Merging h8300-remove/h8300-remove (b400126add8f CREDITS: Add Yoshinori Sato for h8300) This tree has been merged upstream and is no longer needed. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19

2013-11-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Guenter, On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 20:08:54 -0800 Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote: Merging h8300-remove/h8300-remove (b400126add8f CREDITS: Add Yoshinori Sato for h8300) This tree has been merged upstream and is no longer needed. Thanks, I will remove it tomorrow. -- Cheers,