Re: [Sound-open-firmware] linux-next: Tree for Nov 6 (sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.o)

2020-11-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/6/20 12:53 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > >> on x86_64: >> >> ld: sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.o: in function `sof_pci_probe': >> sof-pci-dev.c:(.text+0x5c): undefined reference to >> `snd_intel_dsp_driver_probe' >> >> >> Full randconfig file is attached. > > Nice catch, thanks Randy! Look

Re: [Sound-open-firmware] linux-next: Tree for Nov 6 (sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.o)

2020-11-06 Thread Pierre-Louis Bossart
on x86_64: ld: sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.o: in function `sof_pci_probe': sof-pci-dev.c:(.text+0x5c): undefined reference to `snd_intel_dsp_driver_probe' Full randconfig file is attached. Nice catch, thanks Randy! Looks like we put the select SND_INTEL_DSP_CONFIG in the wrong place, it's n

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 6 (sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.o)

2020-11-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/5/20 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20201105: > on x86_64: ld: sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.o: in function `sof_pci_probe': sof-pci-dev.c:(.text+0x5c): undefined reference to `snd_intel_dsp_driver_probe' Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy Reported-

linux-next: Tree for Nov 6

2020-11-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20201105: Removed tree: mali-dp not updated in over a year The v4l-dvb tree gained a conflict against the v4l-dvb-fixes tree. The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20201104. The tip tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merg

linux-next: Tree for Nov 6

2018-11-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181105: New trees: risc-v-pjw, sifive, i3c-fixes, i3c The drm-msm tree gained a conflict against the drm-misc tree. The tip tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 825 1082 files changed, 50662 insertion

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 6 (timer conversions)

2017-11-06 Thread Kees Cook
timer_setup() conversion[1] status update: As of this -next tree, there are (at least) 243 "non trivial" conversions staged (with a matching subject of ": Convert timers to use timer_setup"), producing: 723 files changed, 3390 insertions(+), 3927 deletions(-) There are 24 outstanding non-trivial

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 6 (trace_irqsoff.c)

2017-11-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/05/2017 11:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20171103: > on i386: ../kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c: In function 'trace_preempt_on': ../kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c:855:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_preempt_enable_rcuidle' [-Werror=implicit-func

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 6 (amdgpu_virt.c)

2017-11-06 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/05/2017 11:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20171103: >> > > on i386, when CONFIG_MODULES is not set: > > CC drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.o > In file included from ../arch/x86/include/asm/ato

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 6 (amdgpu_virt.c)

2017-11-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/05/2017 11:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20171103: > on i386, when CONFIG_MODULES is not set: CC drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.o In file included from ../arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:5:0, from ../include/linux/atomic.h:5,

linux-next: Tree for Nov 6

2017-11-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20171103: New tree: cpupower The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The crypto tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20171103. The regmap tree lost its build failure. The tip tree gained a conflict against the pm t

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 6

2015-11-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Christian, On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:45:46 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > can you rename that branch to borntraeger/linux-next ? Done. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 6

2015-11-06 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Am 06.11.2015 um 04:24 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Merging access_once/linux-next (fc7f9754db6c s390/dma: Allow per device dma > ops) Stephen, can you rename that branch to borntraeger/linux-next ? It used to carry the access_once reworks, but it will in general hold things that I work on. Tha

linux-next: Tree for Nov 6

2015-11-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do *not* add any material intended for v4.5 to your linux-next included branches until after v4.4-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20151105: The thermal-soc tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The battery tree still had its build failure so I used

linux-next: Tree for Nov 6

2014-11-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Due to a move of office, there will not be a linux-next release on Friday (and maybe Monday). I did not manage to quite get all my builds done today. This tree will not build on 32 bit Sparc (at least). Changes since 20141105: The f2fs tree lost its build failure. The iommu tree lost

linux-next: Tree for Nov 6

2013-11-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20131105: Removed tree: audit-current Changed tree: audit (change of maintainer) The modules tree lost its very large number of warnings. The audit tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree and a build failure so I used the version from next-20131105. The xen-tip tree g

linux-next: Tree for Nov 6

2012-11-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20121105: The pci tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The v4l-dvb tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20121026. The thermal tree lost its conflict. The pm tree gained a conflict against the pci tree. The tty tre