Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 9 (intel_pch_thermal.o)

2020-11-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/8/20 11:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20201106: > on i386 or x86_64: # CONFIG_ACPI is not set ../drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c: In function ‘pch_wpt_suspend’: ../drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c:216:8: error: ‘acpi_gbl_FADT’ undeclared

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 9 (cpumask_parse)

2020-11-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/8/20 11:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20201106: > on x86_64: # CONFIG_SMP is not set ld: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.o: in function `rdtgroup_cpus_write': rdtgroup.c:(.text+0x35f0): undefined reference to `cpulist_parse' ld: kernel/sched/isolation.o:

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2020-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20201106: The drivers-memory tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. The mfd tree lost its build failure. The tip tree gained conflicts against the block tree. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the tip tree. Non-merge commits (relative to

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2018-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181108: The tip tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1966 2112 files changed, 84671 insertions(+), 86429 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2018-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181108: The tip tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1966 2112 files changed, 84671 insertions(+), 86429 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2017-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20171108: The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. It also gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The vfs tree gained conflicts against the btrfs-kdave, ext3, f2fs and overlayfs trees. The devicetree tree gained conflicts against the

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2017-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20171108: The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. It also gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The vfs tree gained conflicts against the btrfs-kdave, ext3, f2fs and overlayfs trees. The devicetree tree gained conflicts against the

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 9 (netdev, netfilter v6)

2016-11-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/08/16 20:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20161108: > > The drm-misc tree gained a build failure, so I used the version from > next-20161108. > > The sound-asoc tree still had its build failure, so I used the version > from next-20161028. (similar to yesterday,

Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 9 (netdev, netfilter v6)

2016-11-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/08/16 20:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20161108: > > The drm-misc tree gained a build failure, so I used the version from > next-20161108. > > The sound-asoc tree still had its build failure, so I used the version > from next-20161028. (similar to yesterday,

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2016-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20161108: The drm-misc tree gained a build failure, so I used the version from next-20161108. The sound-asoc tree still had its build failure, so I used the version from next-20161028. The scsi-mkp tree gained conflicts against the block and scsi trees. The rtc tree lost

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2016-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20161108: The drm-misc tree gained a build failure, so I used the version from next-20161108. The sound-asoc tree still had its build failure, so I used the version from next-20161028. The scsi-mkp tree gained conflicts against the block and scsi trees. The rtc tree lost

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2015-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do *not* add any material intended for v4.5 to your linux-next included branches until after v4.4-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20151106: Dropped tree: akpm-current (too many complex conflicts) The pm tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The thermal tree inherited

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2015-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do *not* add any material intended for v4.5 to your linux-next included branches until after v4.4-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20151106: Dropped tree: akpm-current (too many complex conflicts) The pm tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The thermal tree inherited

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2012-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20121108: The pci tree still has its build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The v4l-dvb tree still has its build failure so I used the version from next-20121026. The net-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The pinctrl tree lost its build

linux-next: Tree for Nov 9

2012-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20121108: The pci tree still has its build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The v4l-dvb tree still has its build failure so I used the version from next-20121026. The net-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The pinctrl tree lost its build