Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (objtool)

2019-10-22 Thread Christian Brauner
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:40:34AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 09:36:53PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > Ok, so I take it you route that patch somehwere through tip? > > I'm happy with the ubsan fix: > > Yeah, I'll go make a real patch with Changelog of it and

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (objtool)

2019-10-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 09:36:53PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > Ok, so I take it you route that patch somehwere through tip? > I'm happy with the ubsan fix: Yeah, I'll go make a real patch with Changelog of it and stick it in tip. > Acked-by: Christian Brauner Thanks!

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (objtool)

2019-10-21 Thread Christian Brauner
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:19:48PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:11:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > By popular request; here's that alternative. Completely untested :-) > > > > Am I not

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (objtool)

2019-10-21 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/21/19 6:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:35:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:33:11AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 10/18/19 12:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20191017: >>> >>> on x86_64: >>>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (objtool)

2019-10-21 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:19:48PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:11:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > By popular request; here's that alternative. Completely untested :-) > > Am I not getting some mails? :) You're not on the 'right' IRC channels :-) > I

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (objtool)

2019-10-21 Thread Christian Brauner
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:11:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:35:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:33:11AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 10/18/19 12:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Changes since

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (objtool)

2019-10-21 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:35:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:33:11AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 10/18/19 12:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20191017: > > > > > > > on x86_64: > > lib/usercopy.o: warning: objtool:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (objtool)

2019-10-21 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:33:11AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/18/19 12:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20191017: > > > > on x86_64: > lib/usercopy.o: warning: objtool: check_zeroed_user()+0x35f: call to > __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds() with

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (objtool)

2019-10-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/18/19 12:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20191017: > on x86_64: lib/usercopy.o: warning: objtool: check_zeroed_user()+0x35f: call to __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds() with UACCESS enabled .o file is attached. -- ~Randy usercopy.o Description: