Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (xen)

2016-10-18 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
This has already been reported: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=147628583512117=3 Thanks. -boris On 10/18/2016 10:56 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/17/16 19:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20161017: > > on i386: > > arch/x86/built-in.o: In function

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (xen)

2016-10-18 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
This has already been reported: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=147628583512117=3 Thanks. -boris On 10/18/2016 10:56 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/17/16 19:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20161017: > > on i386: > > arch/x86/built-in.o: In function

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (xen)

2016-10-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/17/16 19:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20161017: on i386: arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `xen_start_kernel': (.init.text+0x2fa6): undefined reference to `xen_cpu_dead' arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `xen_start_kernel': (.init.text+0x2fab): undefined

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 18 (xen)

2016-10-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/17/16 19:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20161017: on i386: arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `xen_start_kernel': (.init.text+0x2fa6): undefined reference to `xen_cpu_dead' arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `xen_start_kernel': (.init.text+0x2fab): undefined