linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2016-10-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20161021: The net tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The drm-misc tree gained conflicts against the drm-intel tree and a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The akpm-current tree still had its build fail

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > I think one problem we have is how to report breakages. Any summary > mail or web page doesn't help if no one looks at it. It does help lot > to send specific e-mail along the line of "Commit 'bla' caused build 'x' > to fail as follows" to th

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:17:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > "Doesn't even build" is relative, though. After all, there still _are_ > > 18 build failures out of 106 in my test builds alone. Where do you draw > > the line ? arm failures are bad, who cares about blackfin ? > > Well, I'

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:33:43AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > The rule I was applying (which I think is the same as Stephen applies) > > is that I'd fix anything that was definitely the result of a merge issue > > (like the build failure

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Thierry Reding
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:02:28AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:53AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:53AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Thierry Reding
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:53AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding > >> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Olof Johansson
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wr

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Thierry Reding
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > >> >Hi all, > >> > > >> >I've uploaded today's linux-ne

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Olof Johansson
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding > >> > Yeah, I saw the devm_gpio_request_one() errors too. They happened for 3 >> > boards on ARM I think. Must have forgotten to

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding > > Yeah, I saw the devm_gpio_request_one() errors too. They happened for 3 > > boards on ARM I think. Must have forgotten to update the summary email. > > I'll see if I can come up wi

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Olof Johansson
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: >> >Hi all, >> > >> >I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the >> >repository below: >> > >> > gi

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-25 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the > >repository below: > > > > git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git > > > >A next-2013

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-24 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: Hi all, I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the repository below: git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git A next-20131024 tag is also provided for convenience. Quite a few new conflicts. Some of them non

linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2013-10-24 Thread Thierry Reding
Hi all, I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the repository below: git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git A next-20131024 tag is also provided for convenience. Quite a few new conflicts. Some of them non-trivial. I've fixed another set of build failure

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xen)

2012-10-25 Thread gre...@linuxfoundation.org
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:05:43PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 25.10.12 at 15:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > >>> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> > >>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote: >

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xen)

2012-10-25 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.10.12 at 15:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> > > On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi all,

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xen)

2012-10-25 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> Changes since 201201023: > > >> > > > > > > o

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xen)

2012-10-25 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 201201023: > >> > > > > on x86_64: > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep': > > (.text+0xb96b5

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xen)

2012-10-25 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 201201023: >> > > on x86_64: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep': > (.text+0xb96b5): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_reset_prep' > drivers/built-

linux-next: Tree for Oct 24

2012-10-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 201201023: The wireless-next tree lost its conflicts. The pm tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. The tty tree gained a build failure for which I disabled a staging driver. The usb tree lost its build failure. The akpm tree still has its 2 build failu