Hi all,
Changes since 20161021:
The net tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The drm-misc tree gained conflicts against the drm-intel tree and a
build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.
The akpm-current tree still had its build
Hi all,
Changes since 20161021:
The net tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The drm-misc tree gained conflicts against the drm-intel tree and a
build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.
The akpm-current tree still had its build
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I think one problem we have is how to report breakages. Any summary
> mail or web page doesn't help if no one looks at it. It does help lot
> to send specific e-mail along the line of "Commit 'bla' caused build 'x'
> to fail as follows" to
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:17:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > "Doesn't even build" is relative, though. After all, there still _are_
> > 18 build failures out of 106 in my test builds alone. Where do you draw
> > the line ? arm failures are bad, who cares about blackfin ?
>
> Well,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:33:43AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The rule I was applying (which I think is the same as Stephen applies)
> > is that I'd fix anything that was definitely the result of a merge issue
> > (like the build failure
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:02:28AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:53AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:53AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:53AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> >> On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> >Hi all,
> >> >
> >> >I've uploaded today's
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
>
>> > Yeah, I saw the devm_gpio_request_one() errors too. They happened for 3
>> > boards on ARM I think. Must have forgotten to
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
> > Yeah, I saw the devm_gpio_request_one() errors too. They happened for 3
> > boards on ARM I think. Must have forgotten to update the summary email.
> > I'll see if I can come up
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
>> >repository below:
>> >
>> >
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
> >repository below:
> >
> > git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
> >
> >A
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131024 tag is also
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
Yeah, I saw the devm_gpio_request_one() errors too. They happened for 3
boards on ARM I think. Must have forgotten to update the summary email.
I'll see if I can come up with a
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
Yeah, I saw the devm_gpio_request_one() errors too. They happened for 3
boards on ARM I think. Must have
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:02:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:53AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:53AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:16:02AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:02:28AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:43:53AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 06:33:43AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
The rule I was applying (which I think is the same as Stephen applies)
is that I'd fix anything that was definitely the result of a merge issue
(like the
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:17:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Doesn't even build is relative, though. After all, there still _are_
18 build failures out of 106 in my test builds alone. Where do you draw
the line ? arm failures are bad, who cares about blackfin ?
Well, I've been
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote:
I think one problem we have is how to report breakages. Any summary
mail or web page doesn't help if no one looks at it. It does help lot
to send specific e-mail along the line of Commit 'bla' caused build 'x'
to fail as
On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131024 tag is also provided for convenience.
Quite a few new conflicts. Some of them
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131024 tag is also provided for convenience.
Quite a few new conflicts. Some of them non-trivial. I've fixed another
set of build
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131024 tag is also provided for convenience.
Quite a few new conflicts. Some of them non-trivial. I've fixed another
set of build
On 10/24/2013 09:31 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi all,
I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
repository below:
git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
A next-20131024 tag is also provided for convenience.
Quite a few new conflicts. Some of them
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:05:43PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.10.12 at 15:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> >>> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> > >>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>>> On 25.10.12 at 15:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > >>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> > > On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Changes since 201201023:
> > >>
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes since 201201023:
> >>
> >
> > on x86_64:
> >
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep':
> >
>>> On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 201201023:
>>
>
> on x86_64:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep':
> (.text+0xb96b5): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_reset_prep'
>
On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote:
On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 201201023:
on x86_64:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep':
(.text+0xb96b5): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_reset_prep'
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote:
On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 201201023:
on x86_64:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep':
(.text+0xb96b5):
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote:
On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 201201023:
on x86_64:
On 25.10.12 at 15:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net wrote:
On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:05:43PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.10.12 at 15:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.10.12 at 23:33, Randy Dunlap
Hi all,
Changes since 201201023:
The wireless-next tree lost its conflicts.
The pm tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
The tty tree gained a build failure for which I disabled a staging driver.
The usb tree lost its build failure.
The akpm tree still has its 2 build
Hi all,
Changes since 201201023:
The wireless-next tree lost its conflicts.
The pm tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
The tty tree gained a build failure for which I disabled a staging driver.
The usb tree lost its build failure.
The akpm tree still has its 2 build
42 matches
Mail list logo
