On 11/01/13 08:16, David Howells wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> crypto/built-in.o: In function `RSA_verify_signature':
>> rsa.c:(.text+0x1d347): undefined reference to `mpi_get_nbits'
>> rsa.c:(.text+0x1d354): undefined reference to `mpi_get_nbits'
>> ...
>
> Does the attached patch fix it
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> crypto/built-in.o: In function `RSA_verify_signature':
> rsa.c:(.text+0x1d347): undefined reference to `mpi_get_nbits'
> rsa.c:(.text+0x1d354): undefined reference to `mpi_get_nbits'
> ...
Does the attached patch fix it for you?
David
---
KEYS: The RSA public key
Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
crypto/built-in.o: In function `RSA_verify_signature':
rsa.c:(.text+0x1d347): undefined reference to `mpi_get_nbits'
rsa.c:(.text+0x1d354): undefined reference to `mpi_get_nbits'
...
Does the attached patch fix it for you?
David
---
KEYS: The RSA
On 11/01/13 08:16, David Howells wrote:
Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
crypto/built-in.o: In function `RSA_verify_signature':
rsa.c:(.text+0x1d347): undefined reference to `mpi_get_nbits'
rsa.c:(.text+0x1d354): undefined reference to `mpi_get_nbits'
...
Does the attached patch
On 10/31/13 03:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20131030:
>
> The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
>
> The devicetree tree gained a conflict against the crypto tree.
>
> The tty tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20131030.
On 10/31/13 03:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20131030:
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The devicetree tree gained a conflict against the crypto tree.
The tty tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20131030.
The
6 matches
Mail list logo
