On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:54 AM Changbin Du wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:43:44AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 12:55 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du
> > > > wrote:
> >
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:54 AM Changbin Du wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:43:44AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 12:55 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du
> > > > wrote:
> >
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:43:44AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 12:55 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 11:43:44AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 12:55 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 12:55 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > How about clang?
> >
> > For clang, -Og might be equivalent to -O1 at
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 12:55 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > How about clang?
> >
> > For clang, -Og might be equivalent to -O1 at
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:54:25PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > How about clang?
> >
> > For clang, -Og might be equivalent to
Hi Yamada,
>On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 05:25:00PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>[...]
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/virt/vboxguest/vboxguest_core.c
> > > > b/drivers/virt/vboxguest/vboxguest_core.c
> > > > index 3093655c7b92..1475ed5ffcde 100644
> > > > ---
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:54:25PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > How about clang?
> >
> > For clang, -Og might be equivalent to
Hi Yamada,
>On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 05:25:00PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>[...]
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/virt/vboxguest/vboxguest_core.c
> > > > b/drivers/virt/vboxguest/vboxguest_core.c
> > > > index 3093655c7b92..1475ed5ffcde 100644
> > > > ---
On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> How about clang?
>
> For clang, -Og might be equivalent to -O1 at this moment, but I am not
> sure.
>
> In my understanding, Clang does
On 11/2/18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> How about clang?
>
> For clang, -Og might be equivalent to -O1 at this moment, but I am not
> sure.
>
> In my understanding, Clang does
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:42 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:32 PM Changbin Du wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:42 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:42 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:32:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:42 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:42 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
> >> until after the merge window closes.
> >>
> >>
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:42 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
> >> until after the merge window closes.
> >>
> >>
On 10/31/18 2:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
>>> until after the merge window closes.
>>>
>>> Changes since 20181030:
>>>
>>
On 10/31/18 2:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
>>> until after the merge window closes.
>>>
>>> Changes since 20181030:
>>>
>>
On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
>> until after the merge window closes.
>>
>> Changes since 20181030:
>>
>
>
> on i386:
>
> ld:
On 10/31/18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
>> until after the merge window closes.
>>
>> Changes since 20181030:
>>
>
>
> on i386:
>
> ld:
On 10/31/18 9:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31-10-18 16:51, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
>>> until after the merge window closes.
>>>
>>> Changes since
On 10/31/18 9:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31-10-18 16:51, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
>>> until after the merge window closes.
>>>
>>> Changes since
Hi,
On 31-10-18 16:51, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
until after the merge window closes.
Changes since 20181030:
on i386:
ld: drivers/virt/vboxguest/vboxguest_core.o: in
Hi,
On 31-10-18 16:51, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
until after the merge window closes.
Changes since 20181030:
on i386:
ld: drivers/virt/vboxguest/vboxguest_core.o: in
On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
> until after the merge window closes.
>
> Changes since 20181030:
>
on i386:
ld: drivers/virt/vboxguest/vboxguest_core.o: in function `vbg_ioctl_hgcm_call':
On 10/30/18 8:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any v4.21/v5.1 code to your linux-next included trees
> until after the merge window closes.
>
> Changes since 20181030:
>
on i386:
ld: drivers/virt/vboxguest/vboxguest_core.o: in function `vbg_ioctl_hgcm_call':
28 matches
Mail list logo