Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 9th (of: unittest: testcases)

2017-10-11 Thread Frank Rowand
On 10/10/17 11:26, Rob Herring wrote: > +Frank > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 10/09/17 14:21, Mark Brown wrote: >>> For my birthday I've gone and got myself a linux-next tree: >>> >>> Changes since 20170929: >>> >>> The net-next and drm trees lost their build fail

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 9th (of: unittest: testcases)

2017-10-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/10/17 11:26, Rob Herring wrote: > +Frank > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 10/09/17 14:21, Mark Brown wrote: >>> For my birthday I've gone and got myself a linux-next tree: >>> >>> Changes since 20170929: >>> >>> The net-next and drm trees lost their build fail

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 9th (of: unittest: testcases)

2017-10-10 Thread Rob Herring
+Frank On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/09/17 14:21, Mark Brown wrote: >> For my birthday I've gone and got myself a linux-next tree: >> >> Changes since 20170929: >> >> The net-next and drm trees lost their build failures but the rcu tree >> gained one. > > > I don't

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 9th (of: unittest: testcases)

2017-10-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 10/09/17 14:21, Mark Brown wrote: > For my birthday I've gone and got myself a linux-next tree: > > Changes since 20170929: > > The net-next and drm trees lost their build failures but the rcu tree > gained one. I don't know what this is but it's new AFAIK. (seen on i386 and x86_64) DTC