Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (net/ipv4/devinet.c)

2020-09-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 9/18/20 1:25 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Le 17/09/2020 à 22:45, Randy Dunlap a écrit : >> On 9/17/20 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20200916: >>> >> >> >> Maybe some older versions of gcc just can't handle IS_ENABLED() inside an >> if (expression) very well.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (net/ipv4/devinet.c)

2020-09-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Randy, On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:45:52 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Maybe some older versions of gcc just can't handle IS_ENABLED() inside an > if (expression) very well. > > > gcc --version > gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 > > This patch: > > commit 9efd6a3cecdde984d67e63d17fe6af53c7c50968 > Autho

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (net/ipv4/devinet.c)

2020-09-18 Thread Nicolas Dichtel
Le 17/09/2020 à 22:45, Randy Dunlap a écrit : > On 9/17/20 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20200916: >> > > > Maybe some older versions of gcc just can't handle IS_ENABLED() inside an > if (expression) very well. > >> gcc --version > gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 I tried

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 17 (net/ipv4/devinet.c)

2020-09-17 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 9/17/20 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200916: > Maybe some older versions of gcc just can't handle IS_ENABLED() inside an if (expression) very well. > gcc --version gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0 This patch: commit 9efd6a3cecdde984d67e63d17fe6af53c7c50968 Author: