On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:55 PM Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> On 9/8/20 6:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 9/8/20 5:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Randy,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Thu,
On 9/8/20 6:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 9/8/20 5:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Randy,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On
On 9/8/20 5:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>
On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/2/20
Hi Randy,
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20200828:
>>>
>>>
>>> on i386:
>>>
>>> ../lib/ubsan.c: In function
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes since 20200828:
> >>
> >
> >
> > on i386:
> >
> > ../lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’:
> > ../lib/ubsan.c:141:2:
On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20200828:
>>
>
>
> on i386:
>
> ../lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’:
> ../lib/ubsan.c:141:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘kunit_fail_current_test’; did you
Hi all,
Changes since 20200828:
The drm tree inherited the drm-misc tree's build failure.
The rcu tree gained a conflict against the jc_docs tree.
The scsi tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
The akpm tree lost 3 patches that turned up elsewhere.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus'
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:11:45AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 11:07 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 9/2/19 10:46 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:39:39AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > On 9/2/19 5:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> >
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 11:07 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/2/19 10:46 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:39:39AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 9/2/19 5:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > News: I will only be doing 2 more releases before I leave
On 9/2/19 10:46 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:39:39AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 9/2/19 5:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> News: I will only be doing 2 more releases before I leave for Kernel
>>> Summit (there may be some reports on Thursday, but I doubt I
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:39:39AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/2/19 5:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > News: I will only be doing 2 more releases before I leave for Kernel
> > Summit (there may be some reports on Thursday, but I doubt I will have
> > time to finish the
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:39:39AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/2/19 5:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > News: I will only be doing 2 more releases before I leave for Kernel
> > Summit (there may be some reports on Thursday, but I doubt I will have
> > time to finish the
On 9/2/19 5:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> News: I will only be doing 2 more releases before I leave for Kernel
> Summit (there may be some reports on Thursday, but I doubt I will have
> time to finish the full release) and then no more until Sept 30.
>
> Changes since 20190830:
>
Hi all,
News: I will only be doing 2 more releases before I leave for Kernel
Summit (there may be some reports on Thursday, but I doubt I will have
time to finish the full release) and then no more until Sept 30.
Changes since 20190830:
The compiler-attributes tree lost its build failure.
The
CCing author of the regression.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/02/15 01:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There will be no linux-next release this Friday or Monday.
>>
>> Please do not add material for v4.4 until after v4.3-rc1 is out.
>>
>> Changes since
CCing author of the regression.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/02/15 01:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There will be no linux-next release this Friday or Monday.
>>
>> Please do not add material for v4.4 until after v4.3-rc1 is
On 09/02/15 01:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There will be no linux-next release this Friday or Monday.
>
> Please do not add material for v4.4 until after v4.3-rc1 is out.
>
> Changes since 20150901:
>
on x86_64:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `twl4030_charger_update_current':
Hi all,
There will be no linux-next release this Friday or Monday.
Please do not add material for v4.4 until after v4.3-rc1 is out.
Changes since 20150901:
I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
rebased onto something very old :-(
The block tree gained a
Hi all,
There will be no linux-next release this Friday or Monday.
Please do not add material for v4.4 until after v4.3-rc1 is out.
Changes since 20150901:
I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been
rebased onto something very old :-(
The block tree gained a
On 09/02/15 01:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There will be no linux-next release this Friday or Monday.
>
> Please do not add material for v4.4 until after v4.3-rc1 is out.
>
> Changes since 20150901:
>
on x86_64:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `twl4030_charger_update_current':
Changes since 20140902:
The akpm-current tree lost its conflict against Linus' tree and two
patches from it got applied.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3475
2949 files changed, 116735 insertions(+), 88213 deletions(-)
I have created today's linux-next tree at
Changes since 20140902:
The akpm-current tree lost its conflict against Linus' tree and two
patches from it got applied.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3475
2949 files changed, 116735 insertions(+), 88213 deletions(-)
I have created today's linux-next tree at
Changes since 20140901:
The akpm-current tree lost its conflict against Linus' tree and two
patches from it got applied.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3078
2790 files changed, 105584 insertions(+), 81173 deletions(-)
I have created today's linux-next tree at
Changes since 20140901:
The akpm-current tree lost its conflict against Linus' tree and two
patches from it got applied.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3078
2790 files changed, 105584 insertions(+), 81173 deletions(-)
I have created today's linux-next tree at
Hi all,
Changes since 20130830:
New tree: h8300-remove
The drm tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree and a build
failure for which I applied a patch.
The ipsec-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
Hi all,
Changes since 20130830:
New tree: h8300-remove
The drm tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree and a build
failure for which I applied a patch.
The ipsec-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
27 matches
Mail list logo