Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8 (sched/topology.c)

2020-09-08 Thread Valentin Schneider
On 08/09/20 16:50, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Sure, here it is again. And > CONFIG_SMP=y > CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y > > thanks. Okay so I can reproduce that with GCC-10.1, now to figure out WTH is going on...

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8 (sched/topology.c)

2020-09-08 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 9/8/20 9:28 AM, Valentin Schneider wrote: > > On 08/09/20 17:07, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> On 08/09/20 16:50, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> Sure, here it is again. And >>> CONFIG_SMP=y >>> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y >>> >>> thanks. >> >> Okay so I can reproduce that with GCC-10.1, now to figure out WTH

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8 (sched/topology.c)

2020-09-08 Thread Valentin Schneider
On 08/09/20 17:07, Valentin Schneider wrote: > On 08/09/20 16:50, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Sure, here it is again. And >> CONFIG_SMP=y >> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y >> >> thanks. > > Okay so I can reproduce that with GCC-10.1, now to figure out WTH is going > on... Yet another fail from my end, the de

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8 (sched/topology.c)

2020-09-08 Thread Valentin Schneider
On 08/09/20 16:03, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Adding Valentin as this seems related to the patch "sched/topology: > Move sd_flag_debug out of linux/sched/topology.h" > Thanks! > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 16:48, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> On 9/8/20 3:56 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > Hi all, >> >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8 (sched/topology.c)

2020-09-08 Thread Vincent Guittot
Adding Valentin as this seems related to the patch "sched/topology: Move sd_flag_debug out of linux/sched/topology.h" On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 16:48, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 9/8/20 3:56 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200903: > > > > on i386: > > ld: kernel/sched/

linux-next: Tree for Sep 8

2020-09-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200903: I reverted a commit from the kbuild tree on request. The vfs tree gained conflicts against the m68k and s390 trees. The v4l-dvb tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20200903. The bpf-next tree gained a build failure so I used the version f

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8

2017-09-10 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > $ git checkout -b akpm remotes/origin/akpm/master > Applying: drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c: fix build with gcc-4.4.4 Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of

linux-next: Tree for Sep 8

2017-09-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.15 related material to your linux-next included branches until after v4.14-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20170907: Removed tree: wberr at maintainer's request (finished with) The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I applied a fix patc

linux-next: Tree for Sep 8

2016-09-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160907: The btrfs-kdave tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20160906. The drm-intel tree gained a conflict aginst Linus' tree. The kbuild tree still had its build warnings for PowerPC, for which I reverted a commit. Non-merge commits (relati

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8 (netfilter build error)

2015-09-08 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 09/07/15 22:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add material for v4.4 until after v4.3-rc1 is out. > > Changes since 20150903: > on i386: net/built-in.o: In function `nf_dup_ipv6': (.text+0x16dfba): undefined reference to `nf_conntrack_untracked' net/built-in.o: In funct

linux-next: Tree for Sep 8

2015-09-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add material for v4.4 until after v4.3-rc1 is out. Changes since 20150903: I used the h8300 tree from next-20150828 since the current tree has been rebased onto something very old :-( The parisc-hd tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The v4l-dvb tree gained a conf

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 8

2014-09-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:53:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Changes since 20140905: In my haste to get home for dinner, I forgot to thank Mark Brown for stepping in again last week - the break was much appreciated. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au

linux-next: Tree for Sep 8

2014-09-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140905: The drm tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The wireless-next tree gained a build failure for which I applied a suggested fix patch. The integrity tree gained a conflict aga