Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64)

2012-09-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: [...] > >> > >> Just wondering... Fell over it when digging into my boot-problem (this > >> appeared as a new Kconfig option, so).

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64)

2012-09-06 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Andre Przywara >> wrote: >> > On 09/06/2012 10:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64)

2012-09-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Andre Przywara > wrote: > > On 09/06/2012 10:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64)

2012-09-06 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > On 09/06/2012 10:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64)

2012-09-06 Thread Andre Przywara
On 09/06/2012 10:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Hi, Unfortunately, t

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64)

2012-09-06 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Changes since 20120905: >> >> >> >> N

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64)

2012-09-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 20120905: > >> > >> New tree: arm64 > >> > >> The powerpc tree gained a build failure for

Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64)

2012-09-06 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20120905: >> >> New tree: arm64 >> >> The powerpc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted 3 commits. >> >> The net-next tree lost its build failu

linux-next: Tree for Sept 6

2012-09-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20120905: New tree: arm64 The powerpc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted 3 commits. The net-next tree lost its build failure. The trivial tree gained a conflict against the powerpc tree. The spi-mb tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next