Re: linux-next: bad commit in the luto-misc tree

2015-01-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andy, On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:42:31 -0800 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Sorry. I totally failed here. I swear I rebased onto the latest RCU > tree, double-checked it, and pushed that exact revision to luto/next. > Somehow I pushed a much older development commit. I have no idea how > I did that.

Re: linux-next: bad commit in the luto-misc tree

2015-01-04 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I noticed commit 7d032e5b1042 ("[TEST ONLY] Force RCU NMI nesting") has > no Signed-off-by ... I understand that this is for testing, but that > is *not* what linux-next is really for. Especially given that that > commit is x8

linux-next: bad commit in the luto-misc tree

2015-01-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andy, I noticed commit 7d032e5b1042 ("[TEST ONLY] Force RCU NMI nesting") has no Signed-off-by ... I understand that this is for testing, but that is *not* what linux-next is really for. Especially given that that commit is x86 only, it should be used for unit testing. not a wider audience lik