Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-20 Thread Michael Ellerman
Will Deacon writes: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:52:40PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Will Deacon writes: >> > Although Alpha, Itanic and PowerPC all override NM, only PowerPC does it >> > conditionally so I agree with you that passing '--synthetic' >> > unconditionally >>

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-16 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Michael, On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:52:40PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Will Deacon writes: > > Although Alpha, Itanic and PowerPC all override NM, only PowerPC does it > > conditionally so I agree with you that passing '--synthetic' unconditionally > > would resolve the problem and is

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-15 Thread Michael Ellerman
Will Deacon writes: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 07:34:36PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:50 PM Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >> > ppc64_defconfig) was just spinning in make - it executing some

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 09:33:07 -0700 Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:25 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > > > From 71c67a31f09fa8fdd1495dffd96a5f0d4cef2ede Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Will Deacon > > Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 12:48:33 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-07 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:25 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > Hello Masahiro, > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:43:02PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:46 PM Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 07:34:36PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > > > We're setting NM to

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-07 Thread Will Deacon
Hello Masahiro, On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:43:02PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:46 PM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 07:34:36PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > > We're setting NM to something else based on a config option, which I > > > presume

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-07 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi. On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:46 PM Will Deacon wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 07:34:36PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:50 PM Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-07 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Peter, On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 07:34:36PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:50 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > ppc64_defconfig) was just spinning in make - it executing some scripts, > > but it was

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-06 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:50 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) was just spinning in make - it executing some scripts, > but it was hard to catch just what. > > Apparently caused by commit > > 5cf896fb6be3

linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2019-08-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) was just spinning in make - it executing some scripts, but it was hard to catch just what. Apparently caused by commit 5cf896fb6be3 ("arm64: Add support for relocating the kernel with RELR relocations")

linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2015-03-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Catalin, Yesterday's linux-next overnight builds (most arm builds) failed like this: ./arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds:677: undefined symbol `__hyp_idmap_size' referenced in expression See, for example, http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12391163/ . Have a look at

linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2015-03-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Catalin, Yesterday's linux-next overnight builds (most arm builds) failed like this: ./arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds:677: undefined symbol `__hyp_idmap_size' referenced in expression See, for example, http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12391163/ . Have a look at

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2012-09-17 Thread Catalin Marinas
Hi Stephen, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 02:24:05AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build () > failed like this: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c:146:17: error: conflicting types for > 'compat_sys_sendfile' > include/linux/compat.h:593:16: note:

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2012-09-17 Thread Catalin Marinas
Hi Stephen, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 02:24:05AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build () failed like this: arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c:146:17: error: conflicting types for 'compat_sys_sendfile' include/linux/compat.h:593:16: note:

linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2012-09-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Catalin, After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build () failed like this: arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c:146:17: error: conflicting types for 'compat_sys_sendfile' include/linux/compat.h:593:16: note: previous declaration of 'compat_sys_sendfile' was here

linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree

2012-09-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Catalin, After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build () failed like this: arch/powerpc/kernel/sys_ppc32.c:146:17: error: conflicting types for 'compat_sys_sendfile' include/linux/compat.h:593:16: note: previous declaration of 'compat_sys_sendfile' was here