Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2021-03-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:00:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > [Cc'ing a few (maybe) interested parties] > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 07:47:03 +0100 Björn Töpel wrote: > > > > On 2021-03-11 01:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next bui

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2021-03-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Björn, [Cc'ing a few (maybe) interested parties] On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 07:47:03 +0100 Björn Töpel wrote: > > On 2021-03-11 01:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (perf) failed > > like this: > > > > make[3]: *** No rule to make target

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2021-03-10 Thread Björn Töpel
On 2021-03-11 01:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (perf) failed like this: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'libbpf_util.h', needed by '/home/sfr/next/perf/staticobjs/xsk.o'. Stop. Hi Stephen, It's an incremental build issue,

linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2021-03-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (perf) failed like this: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'libbpf_util.h', needed by '/home/sfr/next/perf/staticobjs/xsk.o'. Stop. Caused by commit 7e8bbe24cb8b ("libbpf: xsk: Move barriers from libbpf_util.h to xsk.h") I

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-12-01 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 12/1/20 9:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig) failed like this: In file included from fs/select.c:32: include/net/busy_poll.h: In function 'sk_mark_napi_id_once': include/net/busy_poll.h:150:36: error: 'const s

linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-12-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig) failed like this: In file included from fs/select.c:32: include/net/busy_poll.h: In function 'sk_mark_napi_id_once': include/net/busy_poll.h:150:36: error: 'const struct sk_buff' has no member named 'napi_id'

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-09-08 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
On 9/7/20 8:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpcle perf) failed like this: util/bpf-loader.c: In function 'config_bpf_program': util/bpf-loader.c:331:2: error: 'bpf_program__title' is deprecated: BPF program title is confusin

linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-09-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpcle perf) failed like this: util/bpf-loader.c: In function 'config_bpf_program': util/bpf-loader.c:331:2: error: 'bpf_program__title' is deprecated: BPF program title is confusing term; please use bpf_program__section_name(

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Alexei, On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:34:52 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:10 PM Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Hi Alexei, > > > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:33:51 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov > > wrote: > > > > > > what do you suggest to use to make it 'manually enab

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-25 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:10 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Alexei, > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:33:51 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > what do you suggest to use to make it 'manually enabled' ? > > All I could think of is to add: > > depends on !COMPILE_TEST > > so that allmodconfig d

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Alexei, On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 07:33:51 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > what do you suggest to use to make it 'manually enabled' ? > All I could think of is to add: > depends on !COMPILE_TEST > so that allmodconfig doesn't pick it up. That is probably sufficient. Some gcc plugins and kasan

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-25 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:50 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Alexei, > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:27:28 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > I didn't receive the first email you've replied to. > > The build error is: > > " > > No libelf found > > make[5]: *** [Makefile:284: elfdep] Error 1

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Alexei, On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:27:28 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > I didn't receive the first email you've replied to. > The build error is: > " > No libelf found > make[5]: *** [Makefile:284: elfdep] Error 1 > " > and build process stops because libelf is not found, right? > That is ex

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-24 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:04 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Alexei, > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:25:44 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 6:20 PM Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:11:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Alexei, On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:25:44 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 6:20 PM Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:11:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > a

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-24 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 6:20 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:11:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > Auto-detecting system feature

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 11:11:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > Auto-detecting system features: > ...libelf: [ OFF ] > ...

linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-08-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: Auto-detecting system features: ...libelf: [ OFF ] ... zlib: [ OFF ] ... bpf: [ on ] No li

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-07-14 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Jiri, On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:33 AM Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 08:16:54AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:22:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-07-14 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 08:16:54AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:22:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > tmp/ccsqpVCY.s: Assembler messages: >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-07-13 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:22:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > tmp/ccsqpVCY.s: Assembler messages: > tmp/ccsqpVCY.s:78: Error: unrecognized symbol type "" > tmp/ccsqpVCY.s:9

linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2020-07-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: tmp/ccsqpVCY.s: Assembler messages: tmp/ccsqpVCY.s:78: Error: unrecognized symbol type "" tmp/ccsqpVCY.s:91: Error: unrecognized symbol type "" I don't know what has caused this (I guess

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2019-06-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:57:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c:1605:5: error: conflicting > types for 'mlx5e_open_cq' > int mlx5e_o

linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2019-06-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c:1605:5: error: conflicting types for 'mlx5e_open_cq' int mlx5e_open_cq(struct mlx5e_channel *c, struct dim_cq_moder moder, ^~~

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2019-02-27 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:31 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/sysctl.c:1238:13: error: 'sysctl_bpf_stats_enabled' undeclared here > (not in a function); did you mean 'sysctl

linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2019-02-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: kernel/sysctl.c:1238:13: error: 'sysctl_bpf_stats_enabled' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'sysctl_base_table'? .data = &sysctl_bpf_stats_enabled, ^

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2017-12-12 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:32:45PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/events/core.o: In function `perf_ioctl': > core.c:(.text+0x98c4): undefined reference to `bpf_event_que

linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

2017-12-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: kernel/events/core.o: In function `perf_ioctl': core.c:(.text+0x98c4): undefined reference to `bpf_event_query_prog_array' Caused by commit f371b304f12e ("bpf/tracing: allow user space