On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 09:37:05AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c: In function 'gen12_emit_fini_breadcrumb':
>
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c: In function 'gen12_emit_fini_breadcrumb':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:4998:31: error: implicit declaration of
function
Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2020-06-16 02:39:12)
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:5972:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c: In function
>
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:5972:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c: In function 'live_timeslice_nopreempt':
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c:5472:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c: In function 'live_timeslice_nopreempt':
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:39 PM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c: In function
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:39 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c: In function 'has_bogus_dpll_config':
>
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c: In function 'has_bogus_dpll_config':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:15432:27: error: macro "IS_GEN" requires 3
arguments, but only 2 given
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 08:51:06AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:03:00AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
> > (x86_allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > CC [M]
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 08:51:06AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:03:00AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
> > (x86_allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > CC [M]
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:03:00AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c: In function
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:03:00AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c: In function
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_allmodconfig) failed like this:
CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.o
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c: In function ‘i915_gem_evict_for_node’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c:318:31: error: implicit
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_allmodconfig) failed like this:
CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.o
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c: In function ‘i915_gem_evict_for_node’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c:318:31: error: implicit
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 01:37:17PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:25:24 +0200
> Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > > On 2017.01.02 21:48:57 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > >> > Alex, I
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 01:37:17PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:25:24 +0200
> Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > > On 2017.01.02 21:48:57 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > >> > Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:25:24 +0200
Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > On 2017.01.02 21:48:57 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> > Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged
> >> > through
>
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:25:24 +0200
Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > On 2017.01.02 21:48:57 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> > Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged
> >> > through
> >> > vfio tree, but wasn't awared one of Jike's
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2017.01.02 21:48:57 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> > Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged through
>> > vfio tree, but wasn't awared one of Jike's fix had conflict. Could you
>> > apply
>> >
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2017.01.02 21:48:57 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> > Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged through
>> > vfio tree, but wasn't awared one of Jike's fix had conflict. Could you
>> > apply
>> > below fix in your tree? I
On 2017.01.02 21:48:57 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged through
> > vfio tree, but wasn't awared one of Jike's fix had conflict. Could you apply
> > below fix in your tree? I think in general for possible interface change in
> >
On 2017.01.02 21:48:57 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged through
> > vfio tree, but wasn't awared one of Jike's fix had conflict. Could you apply
> > below fix in your tree? I think in general for possible interface change in
> >
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:59:29 +0800
Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2017.01.03 10:42:39 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:59:29 +0800
Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2017.01.03 10:42:39 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c: In function
Hi Zhenyu,
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:59:29 +0800 Zhenyu Wang wrote:
>
> Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged through
> vfio tree, but wasn't awared one of Jike's fix had conflict. Could you apply
> below fix in your tree? I think in general for
Hi Zhenyu,
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:59:29 +0800 Zhenyu Wang wrote:
>
> Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged through
> vfio tree, but wasn't awared one of Jike's fix had conflict. Could you apply
> below fix in your tree? I think in general for possible interface
On 2017.01.03 10:42:39 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c: In function 'intel_vgpu_open':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c:511:32: error:
On 2017.01.03 10:42:39 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c: In function 'intel_vgpu_open':
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c:511:32: error:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c: In function 'intel_vgpu_open':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c:511:32: error: dereferencing pointer to
incomplete type 'struct mdev_device'
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c: In function 'intel_vgpu_open':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c:511:32: error: dereferencing pointer to
incomplete type 'struct mdev_device'
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c: In function 'intel_fb_initial_config':
>
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c: In function 'intel_fb_initial_config':
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c: In function 'intel_fb_initial_config':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c:392:4: error: implicit declaration of
function 'drm_get_connector_name'
Hi all,
After merging the drm-intel-fixes tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c: In function 'intel_fb_initial_config':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c:392:4: error: implicit declaration of
function 'drm_get_connector_name'
34 matches
Mail list logo