On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:48:02PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:42 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Either is fine with me, I can revert it, or apply a fix, which ever you
> > want, just let me know.
>
> Well, a proper fix would make this whole episode worthwhile. But if I
> can't
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:42 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Either is fine with me, I can revert it, or apply a fix, which ever you
> want, just let me know.
Well, a proper fix would make this whole episode worthwhile. But if I
can't come up with anything that actually builds in a day or two it'll
have
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:21:28PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Greg,
>
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 12:14 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > I must have compile tested this with CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP=m while
> > the code checks for CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP only (ie, builtin only).
> > I'll have to
Greg,
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 12:14 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> I must have compile tested this with CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP=m while
> the code checks for CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP only (ie, builtin only).
> I'll have to have a better look at this.
>
> Greg, can the cleaning up of this mess
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:57:21 +0200 Paul Bolle wrote:
>
> That may be related to my "staging: rtl8192u: rename
> CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP" (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/26/531 .)
> My message states it was compile tested, but that would be on x86_64.
> Did it only break on
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 11:57 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> That may be related to my "staging: rtl8192u: rename
> CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP" (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/26/531 .)
> My message states it was compile tested, but that
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_tx.c:203:34: error: 'struct
> ieee80211_hdr' has no member named 'addr1'
>
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_tx.c:203:34: error: 'struct
ieee80211_hdr' has no member named 'addr1'
ieee->dev->name, header->addr1);
Greg,
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 12:14 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
I must have compile tested this with CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP=m while
the code checks for CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP only (ie, builtin only).
I'll have to have a better look at this.
Greg, can the cleaning up of this mess involve
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:21:28PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
Greg,
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 12:14 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
I must have compile tested this with CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP=m while
the code checks for CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP only (ie, builtin only).
I'll have to have a
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:42 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Either is fine with me, I can revert it, or apply a fix, which ever you
want, just let me know.
Well, a proper fix would make this whole episode worthwhile. But if I
can't come up with anything that actually builds in a day or two it'll
have to
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:48:02PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:42 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Either is fine with me, I can revert it, or apply a fix, which ever you
want, just let me know.
Well, a proper fix would make this whole episode worthwhile. But if I
can't come up
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_tx.c:203:34: error: 'struct
ieee80211_hdr' has no member named 'addr1'
ieee-dev-name, header-addr1);
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_tx.c:203:34: error: 'struct
ieee80211_hdr' has no member named 'addr1'
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 11:57 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
That may be related to my staging: rtl8192u: rename
CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/26/531 .)
My message states it was compile tested, but that would be
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:57:21 +0200 Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote:
That may be related to my staging: rtl8192u: rename
CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/26/531 .)
My message states it was compile tested, but that would be on x86_64.
Did it only
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:26:54 -0700 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:52:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:52:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_group_set_bits':
> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1357:2: error: implicit
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:52:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_group_set_bits':
fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1357:2: error:
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:26:54 -0700 Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:52:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_group_set_bits':
fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1357:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits'
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_group_set_bits':
fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1357:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits'
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 05:20:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c: In function
> 'iwl_dbgfs_fw_error_dump_release':
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c: In function
> 'iwl_dbgfs_fw_error_dump_release':
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c:161:2: error: implicit declaration
> of
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c: In function
'iwl_dbgfs_fw_error_dump_release':
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c:161:2: error: implicit declaration
of function 'vfree'
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c: In function
'iwl_dbgfs_fw_error_dump_release':
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c:161:2: error: implicit declaration
of function 'vfree'
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c: In function
'iwl_dbgfs_fw_error_dump_release':
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c:161:2: error: implicit declaration
of function
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 05:20:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c: In function
'iwl_dbgfs_fw_error_dump_release':
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:27:52 +1100
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/netfilter/nft_hash.c: In function 'nft_hash_tbl_free':
> net/netfilter/nft_hash.c:79:3: error: implicit declaration of
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:21:00 +1100
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/built-in.o:(.data+0x1868): multiple
> definition of `i40e_ptype_lookup'
>
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_mgmt.h:22:0,
from drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_core.c:17:
drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_core.c: In function
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
net/netfilter/nft_hash.c: In function 'nft_hash_tbl_free':
net/netfilter/nft_hash.c:79:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
net/netfilter/nft_hash.c: In function 'nft_hash_tbl_free':
net/netfilter/nft_hash.c:79:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_mgmt.h:22:0,
from drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_core.c:17:
drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_core.c: In function
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:21:00 +1100
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/built-in.o:(.data+0x1868): multiple
definition of `i40e_ptype_lookup'
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:27:52 +1100
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
net/netfilter/nft_hash.c: In function 'nft_hash_tbl_free':
net/netfilter/nft_hash.c:79:3: error: implicit
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/built-in.o:(.data+0x1868): multiple
definition of `i40e_ptype_lookup'
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/built-in.o:(.data+0x3f58): first defined here
Caused
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:7079:13: error: 'e1000e_pm_suspend'
undeclared here (not in a function)
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:7080:13: error: 'e1000e_pm_resume'
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:7079:13: error: 'e1000e_pm_suspend'
undeclared here (not in a function)
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:7080:13: error: 'e1000e_pm_resume'
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/built-in.o:(.data+0x1868): multiple
definition of `i40e_ptype_lookup'
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/built-in.o:(.data+0x3f58): first defined here
Caused
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, 3:16 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c: In function 'zevio_gpio_port_get':
> >
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, 3:16 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c: In function
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c: In function 'zevio_gpio_port_get':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c:70:2: error: implicit declaration of function
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c: In function 'zevio_gpio_port_get':
drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c:70:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'IOMEM'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c: In function 'zevio_gpio_port_get':
drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c:70:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'IOMEM'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c: In function 'zevio_gpio_port_get':
drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c:70:2: error: implicit
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/iio/adc/men_z188_adc.c: In function 'z188_iio_read_raw':
drivers/iio/adc/men_z188_adc.c:61:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'readw' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/mcb/mcb-pci.c: At top level:
drivers/mcb/mcb-pci.c:110:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage
class [enabled by default]
drivers/mcb/mcb-pci.c:110:1: error: type defaults to
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/mcb/mcb-pci.c: At top level:
drivers/mcb/mcb-pci.c:110:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage
class [enabled by default]
drivers/mcb/mcb-pci.c:110:1: error: type defaults to
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/iio/adc/men_z188_adc.c: In function 'z188_iio_read_raw':
drivers/iio/adc/men_z188_adc.c:61:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'readw' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:40:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:21:29 -0800 Josh Triplett
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Please check the build results overnight tonight (for next-20140227 at
> > >
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:40:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:21:29 -0800 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Please check the build results overnight tonight (for
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:21:29 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Please check the build results overnight tonight (for next-20140227 at
> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next) and submit any more fixes for
> > the
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Please check the build results overnight tonight (for next-20140227 at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next) and submit any more fixes for
> the allnoconfig build errors.
Checking that site, I don't see any other instances
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:19:16 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> Please also fold in my patch "ia64: select CONFIG_TTY for use of
> tty_write_message in unaligned". (Just bounced you a copy.)
Done.
> There's an s390 issue as well which needs the same fix (make the
> top-level architecture
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:02:34 -0800 Josh Triplett
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
> >
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:00:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:02:34 -0800 Josh Triplett
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
> > >
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:02:34 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
> > allnoconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
> allnoconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `.machine_check_queue_event':
> (.text+0x11260): undefined reference
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `.machine_check_queue_event':
(.text+0x11260): undefined reference to `.irq_work_queue'
Caused (or exposed) (along with a lot of warnings) by
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `.machine_check_queue_event':
(.text+0x11260): undefined reference to `.irq_work_queue'
Caused (or exposed) (along with a lot of warnings) by
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `.machine_check_queue_event':
(.text+0x11260): undefined reference to
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:02:34 -0800 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:00:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:02:34 -0800 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the final tree, today's
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:02:34 -0800 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:19:16 -0800 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
Please also fold in my patch ia64: select CONFIG_TTY for use of
tty_write_message in unaligned. (Just bounced you a copy.)
Done.
There's an s390 issue as well which needs the same fix (make the
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Please check the build results overnight tonight (for next-20140227 at
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next) and submit any more fixes for
the allnoconfig build errors.
Checking that site, I don't see any other instances of
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:21:29 -0800 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Please check the build results overnight tonight (for next-20140227 at
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next) and submit any more fixes
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/intel/sst-dsp.c: In function 'sst_dsp_outbox_write':
sound/soc/intel/sst-dsp.c:218:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'memcpy_toio' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/intel/sst-dsp.c: In function 'sst_dsp_outbox_write':
sound/soc/intel/sst-dsp.c:218:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'memcpy_toio' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c: In function 'sun4m_build_device_irq':
> arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c:266:2: error:
Hi Tejun.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:27:00AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:47:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi, Tejun,
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:39:33 -0500 Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:47:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi, Tejun,
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:39:33 -0500 Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Presumably caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup: convert to kernfs")
> > > (see
Hi, Tejun,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:39:33 -0500 Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Presumably caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup: convert to kernfs")
> > (see the comment in commit 1ff6bbfd13ca ("arm, pm, vmpressure: add
> > missing
Hi, Tejun,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:39:33 -0500 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Presumably caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb (cgroup: convert to kernfs)
(see the comment in commit 1ff6bbfd13ca (arm, pm, vmpressure: add
missing
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:47:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi, Tejun,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:39:33 -0500 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Presumably caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb (cgroup: convert to kernfs)
(see
Hi Tejun.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:27:00AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:47:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi, Tejun,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:39:33 -0500 Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c: In function 'sun4m_build_device_irq':
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c:266:2: error: implicit
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Presumably caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup: convert to kernfs")
> (see the comment in commit 1ff6bbfd13ca ("arm, pm, vmpressure: add
> missing slab.h includes")). I wonder how mane more builds are broken by
> this
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c: In function 'sun4m_build_device_irq':
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c:266:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'kzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c: In function 'sun4m_build_device_irq':
arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c:266:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'kzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Presumably caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb (cgroup: convert to kernfs)
(see the comment in commit 1ff6bbfd13ca (arm, pm, vmpressure: add
missing slab.h includes)). I wonder how mane more builds are broken by
this :-(
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:54:12PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c: In function '_rtw_init_mlme_priv':
>
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c: In function '_rtw_init_mlme_priv':
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vzalloc'
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c: In function '_rtw_init_mlme_priv':
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vzalloc'
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:54:12PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c: In function '_rtw_init_mlme_priv':
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c: In function 'kvmppc_44x_exit':
arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c:231:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'kvmppc_booke_exit' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c: In function 'kvmppc_44x_exit':
arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c:231:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'kvmppc_booke_exit' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 20:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S:1312: Error: attempt to
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S: Assembler messages:
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S:1312: Error: attempt to move .org backwards
The last time I got this error, I needed to apply
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S: Assembler messages:
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S:1312: Error: attempt to move .org backwards
The last time I got this error, I needed to apply
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 20:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S: Assembler messages:
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S:1312: Error: attempt to move
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-sch311x.c: In function 'sch311x_sio_enter':
drivers/gpio/gpio-sch311x.c:115:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'outb' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-sch311x.c: In function 'sch311x_sio_enter':
drivers/gpio/gpio-sch311x.c:115:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'outb' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2013, 06:59:56 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Caused by commit 34ef6d7fe467 ("rtc: add hym8563 rtc-driver") from the
> akpm-current tree. Probably some missing include(s).
>
> I just reverted that commit for today.
The includes are fine, I just seem to have forgotten
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2013, 06:59:56 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Caused by commit 34ef6d7fe467 (rtc: add hym8563 rtc-driver) from the
akpm-current tree. Probably some missing include(s).
I just reverted that commit for today.
The includes are fine, I just seem to have forgotten the
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/rtc/rtc-hym8563.c:90:17: error: field 'clkout_hw' has incomplete type
struct clk_hw clkout_hw;
^
In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:13:0,
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c: In function 'do_init_bootmem':
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c:212:49: error: 'memblock_memory' undeclared (first use in
this function)
memblock_set_node(0,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:33:01 + Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:13:41PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > Thanks for applying the patch. The commit introducing error was picked
> > up by Andrew to MM tree and lately got merged to Linus' tree:
> >
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:13:41PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Thanks for applying the patch. The commit introducing error was picked
> up by Andrew to MM tree and lately got merged to Linus' tree:
>
1 - 100 of 708 matches
Mail list logo
