Hi Tejun,
After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c:203:2: error: unknown field 'm_master' specified
in initializer
.m_master = 1,
^
/home/sfr/next/next/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c:204:2: error: unknown field
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:03:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (powercp
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/ata/pata_macio.c:1347:1: error: 'pata_macio_patch' undeclared here
> (not in a function)
> drivers/ata/
Hi Tejun,
After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (powercp
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/ata/pata_macio.c:1347:1: error: 'pata_macio_patch' undeclared here (not
in a function)
drivers/ata/pata_macio.c:1347:1: error:
'__mod_of__pata_macio_patch_device_table' aliased to
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:17:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c: In function 'ahci_platform_init_host':
> drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c:317:20: warning:
Hi Tejun,
After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c: In function 'ahci_platform_init_host':
drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c:317:20: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 01:55:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/ata/ahci_st.c: In function 'st_ahci_probe':
> drivers/ata/ahci_st.c:159:8: error: implicit declaration of
Hi Tejun,
After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/ata/ahci_st.c: In function 'st_ahci_probe':
drivers/ata/ahci_st.c:159:8: error: implicit declaration of function
'ahci_platform_put_resources' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:52:09PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> From: Aaron Lu
> Subject: [PATCH] ata: acpi: Remove ata_dev_acpi_handle stub in libata.h
>
> The ata_dev_acpi_handle is defined in libata-acpi.c and the only
> external user is libata-zpodd.c, which is built when CONFIG_ATA_ACPI
> is set
On 08/27/2013 10:50 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c:14:0:
> drivers/ata/libata.h:136:1: error: unknown type name 'acpi_handle'
> st
Hi Tejun,
After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c:14:0:
drivers/ata/libata.h:136:1: error: unknown type name 'acpi_handle'
static inline acpi_handle ata_dev_acpi_handle(struct ata_device *d
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 08:18:55PM -0700, Terry Suereth wrote:
> Per my original patch, "0x3x26" in code should be "0x3726" (as in the
> unpatched version). I refer to "x26" in comments as a forward-looking
> assumption, but AFAIK only 3726 and 3826 exist at this time.
Heh... No idea how that hap
Per my original patch, "0x3x26" in code should be "0x3726" (as in the
unpatched version). I refer to "x26" in comments as a forward-looking
assumption, but AFAIK only 3726 and 3826 exist at this time.
terry.suer...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
Hi Tejun,
After merging the libata tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c: In function 'sata_pmp_quirks':
drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c:386:36: error: invalid suffix "x26" on integer constant
if (vendor == 0x1095 && (devid == 0x3x26 || dev
13 matches
Mail list logo
