Hi Lee,
After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpio/gpio-crystalcove.c: In function 'crystalcove_gpio_dbg_show':
drivers/gpio/gpio-crystalcove.c:286:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'seq_printf' [-Werror=implicit-functi
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> drivers/mfd/stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_irq_init':
> drivers/mfd/stmpe.c:1000:15: error: 'struct stmpe' has no member named
> 'irq_base'
>base = stmpe->irq_base;
>^
>
> Caused by commit 3ba1d516d5fe ("mfd: stmpe: ro
Hi Lee,
After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/mfd/stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_irq_init':
drivers/mfd/stmpe.c:1000:15: error: 'struct stmpe' has no member named
'irq_base'
base = stmpe->irq_base;
^
Caused by com
Hi Lee,
After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c: In function 'round_armss_rate':
drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1744:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'cpufreq_for_each_entry' [-Werror=implicit-function-de
Hi Lee,
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:06:55 +0800 Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > drivers/mfd/tps65218: struct i2c_device_id is 32 bytes. The last of 1 is:
> > > 0x74 0x70 0x73 0x36 0x35 0x32 0x31
> > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/mfd/tps65218: struct i2c_device_id is 32 bytes. The last of 1 is:
> > 0x74 0x70 0x73 0x36 0x35 0x32 0x31 0x38 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
> > 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x
Stephen,
> > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/mfd/tps65218: struct i2c_device_id is 32 bytes. The last of 1 is:
> > 0x74 0x70 0x73 0x36 0x35 0x32 0x31 0x38 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
> > 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x
Hi Lee,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/mfd/tps65218: struct i2c_device_id is 32 bytes. The last of 1 is:
> 0x74 0x70 0x73 0x36 0x35 0x32 0x31 0x38 0x00
Hi Lee,
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:23:31 +0800 Lee Jones wrote:
>
> Sorry about all this. Your mails are being filtered into an unused
> mailbox for a currently unknown reason. I will investigate this
> immediately. It was a mistake to push this patch, I will rectify right
> away.
I was beginning to
Hi Stephen,
> > > > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > In file included from drivers/mfd/max665x.c:19:0:
> > > > > include/linux/mfd/max665x-private.h:31:1: error: expected ';',
> > > > > identifier or '
Hi Lee,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:32:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:05:08 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:14:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:42:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> > > >
>
Hi Lee,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:05:08 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:14:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:42:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodc
Hi Lee,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:14:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:42:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from drivers/mfd/max665x.c:1
Hi Lee,
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:42:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/mfd/max665x.c:19:0:
> include/linux/mfd/max665x-private.h:31:1: error: expected ';', identif
Hi Lee,
After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/mfd/max665x.c:19:0:
include/linux/mfd/max665x-private.h:31:1: error: expected ';', identifier or
'(' before 'struct'
struct max665x_dev {
^
Caused by commit e7
Hi Lee,
After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/mfd/tps65218: struct i2c_device_id is 32 bytes. The last of 1 is:
0x74 0x70 0x73 0x36 0x35 0x32 0x31 0x38 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x
16 matches
Mail list logo
