Hi Manivannan,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:09:00 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam
wrote:
>
> Patch applied to immutable branch and merged into mhi-next. Now you can
> remove the fix patch.
Thanks for letting me know.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpkekgfT7n1i.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:36:40AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:51:28PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:45:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:39:12 +1100 Stephen Ro
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:51:28PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:45:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:39:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Why isn't that "fix patch" in the mhi tree (with necessar
Hi all,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:45:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:39:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Why isn't that "fix patch" in the mhi tree (with necessary Acked-bys)?
>
> Ignore that, I missed its appearance :-)
Ignore that, my question stands (g
Hi all,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:39:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Why isn't that "fix patch" in the mhi tree (with necessary Acked-bys)?
Ignore that, I missed its appearance :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpiUFU2hM2C_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Manivannan,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:53:59 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam
wrote:
>
> +ath11k list, kalle
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 03:12:25PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
Manivannan Sadhasivam writes:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:53:59AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> +ath11k list, kalle
>>
>
> Oops... adding now
>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 03:12:25PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next bu
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:53:59AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> +ath11k list, kalle
>
Oops... adding now
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 03:12:25PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like th
+ath11k list, kalle
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 03:12:25PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:27:4: error: 'struct
> mhi_channel_config' has no member n
Hi all,
After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:27:4: error: 'struct mhi_channel_config'
has no member named 'auto_start'
27 | .auto_start = false,
|^~
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:42:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:27:4: error: 'struct
> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start
Manivannan Sadhasivam writes:
>> I was looking at commit ed39d7816885 ("bus: mhi: Remove auto-start
>> option") and noticed this in the commit log:
>>
>> This is really up to the MHI device(channel) driver to manage the state
>> of its channels.
>>
>> So does this mean we have to make c
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 07:45:37PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Manivannan Sadhasivam writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:34:40PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >> Manivannan Sadhasivam writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:42:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
Manivannan Sadhasivam writes:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:34:40PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Manivannan Sadhasivam writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:42:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodco
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:34:40PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Manivannan Sadhasivam writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:42:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> >> failed like this:
> >>
> >>
Manivannan Sadhasivam writes:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:42:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:27:4: error: 'struct
>> mhi_channel_conf
Hi Manivannan,
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:40:35 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam
wrote:
>
> But your change looks good and I can just modify the subject/description and
> resubmit. Or if Dave prefers to fix the original commit itself in net-next,
> I'm fine!
Dave never rebase the net-next tree, so a new
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:42:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:27:4: error: 'struct
> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start
Hi all,
After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:27:4: error: 'struct mhi_channel_config'
has no member named 'auto_start'
27 | .auto_start = false,
|^~
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11
Hi all,
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:34:55 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 01:48:00PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > I am not sure which commit(s) caused t
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 01:48:00PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
>
> I am not sure which commit(s) caused this.
>
Probably the below commit which built fine with gcc but
Hi all,
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:48:00 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/
Hi all,
After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
I am not sure which commit(s) caused this.
I have used the mhi tree from next-20200818 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpd3gORS3Gqv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
23 matches
Mail list logo