Hi Greg,
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:22:20 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> Looks good to me, thanks for this, I'll keep it around for when the
> merge window happens.
Actually, that patch needs to go into the net tree before Dave asks
Linus to merge it - the net tree is based post v4.12-rc1 and
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 10:08:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c: In function
> 'rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if':
> drivers/staging/rtl
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:08:58 +1000
> I applied the following merge fix patch for today.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:49:26 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] net: fix up for "Fix inconsistent teardown and release of
> private netdev state"
>
> Signed-of
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c: In function
'rtw_cfg80211_add_monitor_if':
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/ioctl_cfg80211.c:2670:10: error: 'struct
net_device' has no member
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:27:46 -0500 (EST) David Miller
wrote:
>
> I applied the fix that synced the two header files already.
Sorry about that, I missed it in checking your tree over breakfast :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On 2/15/17 7:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:06:02 -0800
On 2/15/17 7:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:12:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le
perf)
fai
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:06:02 -0800
> On 2/15/17 7:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:12:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le
>>> perf)
>>> failed like this:
>>
On 2/15/17 7:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:12:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
failed like this:
Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_a
Hi all,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:12:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
> failed like this:
>
> Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
> bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
> bpf.c:180:6: error: 'union
Em Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:23:26PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:50:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> >
> > What I think Ingo meant with dependency at the build system level is to
> > somehow state that if file A gets changed, then tool B must be
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:50:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
>
> What I think Ingo meant with dependency at the build system level is to
> somehow state that if file A gets changed, then tool B must be rebuilt.
>
> Now that samples/bpf and tools/perf/ depend on tools/lib/bpf/
Em Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:19:37AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:42:21AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, the perf header files are kept separate from the kernel
> > > header files proper and are not automatically copied over :-
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:42:21AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
> > bpf.c: In funct
On 13 February 2017 at 15:31, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 2/13/17 2:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
>> failed like this:
>>
>> Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
>> bpf.c: In func
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
> failed like this:
>
> Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
> bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
> bpf.c:180:6: error: 'union bpf_attr' has no member named
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -116,6 +116,12 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
>
> #define MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
>
> +/* If BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag is used in BPF_PROG_ATTACH command
> + * to the gi
On 2/13/17 2:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
failed like this:
Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
bpf.c:180:6: error: 'union bpf_attr' has no member name
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64le perf)
failed like this:
Warning: tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h differs from kernel
bpf.c: In function 'bpf_prog_attach':
bpf.c:180:6: error: 'union bpf_attr' has no member named 'attach_flags'; did
you mean 'map_flags'?
On 10/20/2016 05:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:30:33 -0700 Florian Fainelli
> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/20/2016 03:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next buil
Hi Florian,
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:30:33 -0700 Florian Fainelli
wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2016 03:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >>
> >
On 10/20/2016 03:42 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
>>
>> Caused
On 10/20/2016 03:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 2399d6143f85 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Pre
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "kexec_in_progress" [drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
2399d6143f85 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Prevent GPHY shutdown for kexec'd kernels")
I used the version of the
On 10/15/2014 4:02 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:44:11 +1100
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `.LANCHOR0':
:(.rodata+0x6b764): undefined reference
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:44:11 +1100
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `.LANCHOR0':
> :(.rodata+0x6b764): undefined reference to `sti_gmac_data'
> :(.rodata+
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `.LANCHOR0':
:(.rodata+0x6b764): undefined reference to `sti_gmac_data'
:(.rodata+0x6b828): undefined reference to `sti_gmac_data'
:(.rodata+0x6b8ec): undefined
Hi Dave,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:48:59 -0400 (EDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:04:54 +1000
>
> > This is a bit different to yesterday's failure but I assume it is still
> > related to commit 5d6be6a5d486 ("scsi_netlink : Make SCSI_NETLINK
> > depen
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:04:54 +1000
> This is a bit different to yesterday's failure but I assume it is still
> related to commit 5d6be6a5d486 ("scsi_netlink : Make SCSI_NETLINK
> dependent on NET instead of selecting NET").
>
> I used the net tree from next-20140915 aga
Hi Steffen,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:04:54 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && BLUESTONE && CANYONLANDS && GLACIER && EIGER &&
> 440EPX && 440GRX && 440GX && 460SX &&
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig)
failed like this:
warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && BLUESTONE && CANYONLANDS && GLACIER && EIGER &&
440EPX && 440GRX && 440GX && 460SX && 405EX) selects IBM_EMAC_RGMII which has
unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVIC
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
warning: (PPC_CELL_NATIVE && BLUESTONE && CANYONLANDS && GLACIER && EIGER &&
440EPX && 440GRX && 440GX && 460SX && 405EX) selects IBM_EMAC_RGMII which has
unmet direct dependencies (NETDEVIC
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:22:22 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> Sorry about that, I just pushed the following to fix it:
>
>
> [PATCH] mvneta: Add missing if_vlan.h include.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
signatur
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:05:11 +1000
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c: In function 'mvneta_skb_tx_csum':
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c:1374:
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c: In function 'mvneta_skb_tx_csum':
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c:1374:3: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vlan_get_protocol' [-Werror=impl
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 10:36 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit 20fbe3ae990f ("cdc_subset: deal with a device that
> needs reset for timeout").
>
> I have used the net tree from next-20140729 for today (i.e. up to
> commit fe26566d8a0515 ("bnx2x: fix crash during TSO tunneling")).
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/usb/cdc_subset.c:360:15: error: 'dummy_prereset' undeclared here
(not in a function)
.pre_reset = dummy_prereset,
^
drivers/net/usb/cdc_subset.c:361:16: error: 'du
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 2014-07-23 11:38 GMT-07:00 Vince Bridgers :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:53 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Rothwell
>>> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:39:07 +1000
>>>
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next
2014-07-23 11:38 GMT-07:00 Vince Bridgers :
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:53 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Stephen Rothwell
>> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:39:07 +1000
>>
>>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> ERROR: "p
Hi all,
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:53 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:39:07 +1000
>
>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> ERROR: "phy_resume" [drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.k
2014-07-07 19:53 GMT-07:00 David Miller :
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:39:07 +1000
>
>> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> ERROR: "phy_resume" [drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.ko]
>> undefined!
>>
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:39:07 +1000
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "phy_resume" [drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit 0acf16768740 ("net: stmmac: add pl
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "phy_resume" [drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit 0acf16768740 ("net: stmmac: add platform init/exit for
Altera's ARM socfpga").
I reverted that com
On 05/19/2014 08:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> In file included from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:16:0:
> include/linux/if_vlan.h: In function 'vlan_get_encap_level':
> incl
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:16:0:
include/linux/if_vlan.h: In function 'vlan_get_encap_level':
include/linux/if_vlan.h:491:2: error: implicit declaration of function
03, 2012 6:48 PM
To: s...@canb.auug.org.au
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Vipul Pandya; Jay Hernandez
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:06:15 +1000
> Actua
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:06:15 +1000
> Actually, for me it is. I have a script that does the "use yesterday's
> version" for me. To fix (even a one liner) means bringing up an editor,
> commiting, creating the patch and then recommiting it (an implementation
> detail) and
Hi David,
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:50:53 -0400 (EDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> I do have a question though, it is honestly really that much easier to
> revert a whole days worth of changes (and therefore not get the code
> tested at all) than to simply add the obvious one liner?
Actually, for me it
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:18:33 +1000
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c: In function 't4_memory_rw':
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c:420:2: error:
Hi all,
After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c: In function 't4_memory_rw':
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_hw.c:420:2: error: implicit declaration
of function 'vmalloc' [-Werror=implicit-f
49 matches
Mail list logo
