On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:47:20AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:329:12: error: conflicting types for 'kthread_fn'
> 329 | static int kthread_fn(void *data)
> |
Hi all,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:329:12: error: conflicting types for 'kthread_fn'
329 | static int kthread_fn(void *data)
|^~
In file included from kernel/trace/trace_hwlat
Hi all,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c: In function 'nfs_dns_ent_put':
fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c:119:11: error: passing argument 1 of 'call_rcu_sched' from
incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types
Hi all,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_backchannel.c: In function
'svc_rdma_handle_bc_reply':
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_backchannel.c:67:21: error: 'struct rpc_xprt' has
no member named 'recv_lock
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:48:14AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:24:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
...
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:2405:17: note: (near initialization for
> > 'nfsd4_ops[50].op_release')
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c: In function 'nfsd4_layoutget_release':
> > f
Hi all,
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:24:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c: In function 'nfsd4_getdeviceinfo_release':
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:1356:8: error: 'gdev' undeclared (first
Hi all,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c: In function 'nfsd4_getdeviceinfo_release':
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:1356:8: error: 'gdev' undeclared (first use in this function)
kfree(gdev->gd_device);
^
fs/nfsd/nfs4pro
Sorry for my fault.
Please drop the old version and use the new version 3.
thanks,
Kinglong Mee
On 7/21/2015 07:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c: In function 'client_
Hi,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c: In function 'client_has_state':
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:2249:22: error: 'struct nfs4_client' has no member named
'cl_lo_states'
|| !list_empty(&clp->cl_lo_states)
Hi,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig)
failed like this:
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c: In function 'svc_recv':
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:776:20: error: 'current_task' undeclared (first use in
this function)
rqstp->rq_task = current_task;
^
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:07:28PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
>
> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c: In function 'nfsd4_encode_security_label':
> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c:1945:15: error: 'pp' undeclare
Hi Bruce,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c: In function 'nfsd4_encode_security_label':
fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c:1945:15: error: 'pp' undeclared (first use in this function)
__be32 *p = *pp;
^
Caused by comm
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:18:15AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c: In function 'warn_on_nonidempotent_op':
> fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:1861:3: error: implicit declar
Hi Bruce,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c: In function 'warn_on_nonidempotent_op':
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c:1861:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'nfsd4_op_name' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
pr
On Apr 29, 2013, at 2:57 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 02:30:33PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:59 PM, "J. Bruce Fields"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:47:16PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:38 PM, "J. Bru
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 02:30:33PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:59 PM, "J. Bruce Fields"
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:47:16PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:38 PM, "J. Bruce Fields"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 0
On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:59 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:47:16PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:38 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:04:01PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Trond M
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:47:16PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:38 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:04:01PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Trond Myklebust
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 13:47 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:38 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:04:01PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Trond Myklebust
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chu
On Apr 29, 2013, at 1:38 PM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:04:01PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Trond Myklebust
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields"
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:04:01PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Trond Myklebust
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -04
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 13:04 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Trond Myklebust
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuc
On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Trond Myklebust
wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:37 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuck Lever
On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi J.,
> >>>
> >>> After merging th
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi J.,
> >>>
> >>> After merging th
On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi J.,
>>>
>>> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> ppc64_defconfig) failed li
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi J.,
> >
> > After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c: In functio
On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi J.,
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c: In function 'gss_proxy_save_rsc':
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c:1182:3: error: impl
Hi J.,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c: In function 'gss_proxy_save_rsc':
net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c:1182:3: error: implicit declaration of
function 'gss_mech_get_by_OID' [-Werror=implicit-
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:19:42AM +, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 12:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:1923:30: error: 's
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 12:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:1923:30: error: 'struct rpc_task' has no member named
> 'tk_xprt'
>
> Caused by commit dc107402a
Hi all,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c:1923:30: error: 'struct rpc_task' has no member named
'tk_xprt'
Caused by commit dc107402ae06 ("SUNRPC: make AF_LOCAL connect
synchronous") interacting with commit 771
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:41:05AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 03.02.2013 18:41, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> >On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:57:19AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >>On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 01:04:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>After merging the nfsd tree,
03.02.2013 18:41, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:57:19AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 01:04:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c: I
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:57:19AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 01:04:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c: In function 'nfs_dns
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 01:04:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c: In function 'nfs_dns_resolver_cache_init':
> fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c:375:4: error: 'struct cache_detai
Hi,
After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c: In function 'nfs_dns_resolver_cache_init':
fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c:375:4: error: 'struct cache_detail' has no member named
'cache_upcall'
fs/nfs/dns_resolve.c:375:35: warning: lef
39 matches
Mail list logo