On 7/8/2019 12:08 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 12:57:25PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from :32:
./usr/include/rdma/rvt-abi.h:13:10: fatal error: rdma/
Hi Masahiro,
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:33:28 +0900 Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> Yes, this is just a one-liner fix-up,
> so I'd like to fold it into this:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11047283/
Fine by me.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgptzZ9UbTDBm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signa
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:28 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:30:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:04:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:46:34 + Jason Gunthorpe
> > > wrote:
> >
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:30:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:04:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:46:34 + Jason Gunthorpe
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > It isn't quite enough to make the header compile stand alone, I'm
> > > adding th
Hi all,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:04:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:46:34 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > It isn't quite enough to make the header compile stand alone, I'm
> > adding this instead.
> >
> > From 37c1e072276b03b080eb24ff24c39080aeaf49ef Mon Sep 17 00
Hi Jason,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:46:34 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> It isn't quite enough to make the header compile stand alone, I'm
> adding this instead.
>
> From 37c1e072276b03b080eb24ff24c39080aeaf49ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jason Gunthorpe
> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:44:47 -03
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:43:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 07:18:00 + Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > For some reason, I wasn't in initial email report, can you please check why?
>
> Sorry about that, I manually grab email addresses from SOB lines in
> c
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 04:18:00AM -0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:04:16AM +0300, Mark Zhang wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
>
> Stephen,
>
> For some reason, I wasn't in initial email report, can you please check why?
>
> I need to be aware of any issues related to patches wit
Hi Leon,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 07:18:00 + Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> For some reason, I wasn't in initial email report, can you please check why?
Sorry about that, I manually grab email addresses from SOB lines in
commits I am reporting and managed to miss yours this time. I might
try to scrip
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:04:16AM +0300, Mark Zhang wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
Stephen,
For some reason, I wasn't in initial email report, can you please check why?
I need to be aware of any issues related to patches with my name on it
for tracking and improving internal submission flows/checks.
>
>
Hi Stephen,
Can you please try the patch below, thank you.
net/mlx5: Remove include ib_verbs.h in rdma_counter.h
rdma_counter.h include ib_verbs.h which in turn needs rdma_port_counter
from rdma_counter.h, but it is not defined yet.
Fixes: 413d3347503b ("RDMA/counter: Add set/clear per-port aut
Hi all,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from /home/sfr/next/next/include/rdma/rdma_counter.h:12,
from :
/home/sfr/next/next/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h:2126:27: error: field
'port_counter' has incomplete
Hi Jason,
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:08:27 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> From f10ff380fd7dfba4a36d40f8dd00fe17da8a1a10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jason Gunthorpe
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 12:17:48 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/rvt: Do not use a kernel header in the ABI
>
> rvt was using ib_sg
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 12:57:25PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from :32:
> ./usr/include/rdma/rvt-abi.h:13:10: fatal error: rdma/ib_verbs.h: No such
> file or dir
t"
>, "linux-r...@vger.kernel.org"
>
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of
>the rdma tree
>
>On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 02:28:13PM +, Bernard Metzler wrote:
>
>> Thanks for bringing this up. Indeed, that explicit
>> initi
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 02:28:13PM +, Bernard Metzler wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up. Indeed, that explicit
> initialization seem to be inappropriate. Can you please
> fix that as you suggest?
I'm applying this to fix the PER_CPU stuff in siw:
>From 4c7d6dcd364843e408a60952ba914bb72ba
-"Jason Gunthorpe" wrote: -
>To: "Stephen Rothwell" , "Bernard Metzler"
>
>From: "Jason Gunthorpe"
>Date: 07/08/2019 04:09PM
>Cc: "Doug Ledford" , "Linux Next Mailing List"
>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List&
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:03:51PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:544,
>
Hi all,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7,
from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:544,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
from includ
Hi all,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from :32:
./usr/include/rdma/rvt-abi.h:13:10: fatal error: rdma/ib_verbs.h: No such file
or directory
#include
^
Caused by commits
dabac6e460ce (
Hi Jason,
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 13:15:31 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> It should be fixed now
Excellent, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpZStyhu_RVe.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:02:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:14:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > WARNING: modpost: missin
在 2019/7/4 10:04, Jason Gunthorpe 写道:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:02:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:14:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>>> allmodconfig) failed like t
在 2019/7/4 12:07, wangxi 写道:
>
>
> 在 2019/7/4 10:04, Jason Gunthorpe 写道:
>> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:02:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:14:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the rdma tree, today's lin
在 2019/7/4 10:04, Jason Gunthorpe 写道:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:02:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:14:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>>> allmodconfig) failed
在 2019/7/4 10:04, Jason Gunthorpe 写道:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:02:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:14:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>>> allmodconfig) failed like t
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:02:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:14:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > WARNING: modpost: missin
Hi all,
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:14:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_ah.o
> see include/linux/mod
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 03:54:30PM +0800, wangxi wrote:
> > Presumably caused by commit
> >
> > e9816ddf2a33 ("RDMA/hns: Cleanup unnecessary exported symbols")
>
> I have confirmed the latest code in
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git. I
> found that the changes to
在 2019/7/1 12:14, Stephen Rothwell 写道:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_ah.o
> see include/linux/module.h for more information
>
Hi all,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_ah.o
see include/linux/module.h for more information
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
drivers/infin
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:59 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Guy,
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:25:57 + "Guy Levi(SW)" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Huh. So apparently every compiler that tested this patch (0-day, mine,
> > > the submitters) optimized this call away because is_atomic_response()
> > > a
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 09:58:15AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Guy,
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:25:57 + "Guy Levi(SW)" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Huh. So apparently every compiler that tested this patch (0-day, mine,
> > > the submitters) optimized this call away because is_atomic_response
Hi all,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:42:59 + Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:52:54AM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 11:47:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfi
Hi Guy,
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:25:57 + "Guy Levi(SW)" wrote:
>
> >
> > Huh. So apparently every compiler that tested this patch (0-day, mine,
> > the submitters) optimized this call away because is_atomic_response()
> > always returns 0: meaning mlx5_get_atomic_laddr is never callable and
> >
>
> Huh. So apparently every compiler that tested this patch (0-day, mine,
> the submitters) optimized this call away because is_atomic_response()
> always returns 0: meaning mlx5_get_atomic_laddr is never callable and
> can be deleted entirely, including the call to mlx5_get_send_wqe.
>
> Not su
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:52:54AM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 11:47:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR: "mlx5_get_send_wqe" [drivers/infi
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 11:47:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "mlx5_get_send_wqe" [drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 34f4c9554d
Hi all,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "mlx5_get_send_wqe" [drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
34f4c9554d8b ("IB/mlx5: Use fragmented QP's buffer for in-kernel users")
mlx5_get_send_wqe() is
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 10:50 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 06:22:59PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR: "init_rcu_head" [drivers/infiniband/ul
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 06:22:59PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "init_rcu_head" [drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> a11253142e6d ("IB
Hi all,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "init_rcu_head" [drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
a11253142e6d ("IB/srpt: Rework multi-channel support")
I have used the rdma tree from next-2018011
Hi Doug,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_eq.c: In function 'hns_roce_init_eq_table':
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_eq.c:711:9: error: implicit declaration of
function 'request_irq' [-Werror=impl
Hi Doug,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:21:15 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> I created a fix and added it to my tree.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Joe,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:58:55 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>
> Pretty sure there were crossing commits adding PDBG()
> as the original patches were written against next-20170209
>
> From my tree:
>
> $ git log --pretty=oneline -5 747edc68212781296de30dd2b4e63711240da7a9
> 747edc68212781296de
On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 18:58 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 11:42 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c: In function
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 11:42 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c: In function 'send_connect':
> drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c:830:5: error: implicit
Hi Doug,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c: In function 'send_connect':
drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c:830:5: error: implicit declaration of function
'PDBG' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> From: Stephen Rothwell
>> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:23:25 +1100
>> Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/bnxt_re: fix for "bnxt_en: Update to firmware
>> interface spec 1.7.0."
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
>
> Thanks Stephen. I had been forewarn
On 2/14/2017 7:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/main.c: In function 'bnxt_re_net_ring_free':
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/main.c:231:18: error:
> 'RIN
Hi Doug,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/main.c: In function 'bnxt_re_net_ring_free':
drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/main.c:231:18: error:
'RING_ALLOC_REQ_RING_TYPE_CMPL' undeclared (first use in this func
Hi Doug,
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:00:11 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> That doesn't seem like a particularly good thing to put in. Wouldn't
> you end up just reverting it later when they fix lustre? And are you
> going to revert the revert when it breaks again and revert the revert of
> the revert
On 9/28/16 11:23 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:00:11AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> On 9/27/16 9:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:23:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>>> wrote:
Hi Doug,
After merging the rdma tree, today
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:00:11AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 9/27/16 9:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:23:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Doug,
> >>
> >> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >> allmo
On 9/27/16 9:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:23:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:23:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c: In function
> 'kiblnd_hdev_setup_mrs':
> drivers/sta
On 9/27/16 9:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 03:48:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Yeah, sorry. Note, however, that you bothered to fix up this same
>> staging file in another of your patches ...
>
> It's generally not that I don't fix them up because I hate them,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 03:48:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Yeah, sorry. Note, however, that you bothered to fix up this same
> staging file in another of your patches ...
It's generally not that I don't fix them up because I hate them, it's
just because they are doing something so incred
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:04:15 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:23:34AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> Please just disable broken
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:23:34AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
Please just disable broken staging code like lustre for the linux-next
builds. We had that discussion before, didn't we?
Hi Doug,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c: In function
'kiblnd_hdev_setup_mrs':
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c:2317:7: error: implicit
declaration of function 'i
Hi Doug,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:02:42 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> Pending an update from Intel on the i40iw driver, I have pulled it from
> my for-next area. This should not be a problem with tonight's merge.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
: Herbert Xu ; Stephen Rothwell
Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Latif, Faisal
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree
On 3/16/2016 2:49 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:15:38PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
On 3/16/2016 2:49 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:15:38PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> In file included from drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw.h:57:0,
>>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:15:38PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw.h:57:0,
> from drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/
Hi Doug,
After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw.h:57:0,
from drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_cm.c:63:
drivers/infiniband/hw/i40iw/i40iw_osdep.h:175:12: warning: 'struc
66 matches
Mail list logo
