Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:46:
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c: In function 'lpfc_idiag_queacc_write':
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli4.h:1083:14: error: inlining fa
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.c:1285:27: error: initialization from incompatible
pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
.eh_host_reset_handler = qlogicpti_reset,
^
On 02/12/2017 05:32 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:04:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
>>
Hi all,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:04:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
> from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
>
Hi all,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
from include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
from include/
On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 12:46 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:56:34 -0800 James Bottomley <
> > james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 11:45 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi Jame
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:56:34 -0800 James Bottomley
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 11:45 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like
Hi Ingo,
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:15:08 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Yeah, we'll handle it - that's why the final chunk of changes were left to
> after
> -rc1, to not cause such merge conflicts upstream.
Excellent, thanks.
> For now I've excluded the relevant -tip side commits from the linux-ne
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:56:34 -0800 James Bottomley
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 11:45 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like thi
On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 11:45 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c: In function 'qedi_init':
> drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c:2073:2: error: implicit declaratio
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c: In function 'qedi_init':
drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_main.c:2073:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'register_hotcpu_notifier' [-Werror=implicit-function-decl
Thanks Stephen.
Please consider this patch as Ack-by: Sreekanth Reddy
Thanks,
Sreekanth
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/sc
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c:59:0:
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c: In function '_scsih_io_done':
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.h:1414:1: error: inlining
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 18:06 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_mass_storage.c:280:12: error:
> 'MAX_COMMAND_SIZE' undeclared here (not in a function)
>
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_mass_storage.c:280:12: error: 'MAX_COMMAND_SIZE'
undeclared here (not in a function)
u8 cmnd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
^
Caused by commit 0e640c799103 (
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:29 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c: In function 'sdev_prefix_printk':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c:119:6: error: void value
(adding Christoph Hellwig)
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:29 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c: In function 'sdev_prefix_printk':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c: In function 'sdev_prefix_printk':
drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c:119:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to
be
ret = dev_printk(level, &sdev->sdev_gend
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 07:50:16AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> So your idea is Fenguang first then linux-next.
Exactly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.or
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 16:48 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 07:21:30AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > so that's adding the 3.18-incoming trees?
>
> Not yet. Those are for the buildbolt to find any issues before pushing
> it to the actual for-3.x branch. It's a trick
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 07:21:30AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> so that's adding the 3.18-incoming trees?
Not yet. Those are for the buildbolt to find any issues before pushing
it to the actual for-3.x branch. It's a trick I picked up from the nfsd tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 14:46 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:27:13AM +, Anish Bhatt wrote:
> > Fix for this was sent out on thursday itself, but does not seem to be
> > applied yet :
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=141529629911520&w=2
>
> And I pulled it from
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:27:13AM +, Anish Bhatt wrote:
> Fix for this was sent out on thursday itself, but does not seem to be applied
> yet :
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=141529629911520&w=2
And I pulled it from drivers-for-3.18 early on Thursday, but that didn't
propagate to James'
linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Anish Bhatt;
Christoph Hellwig; Karen Xie
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c: In function 'do_abort_req_rss':
drivers/scsi/cxgbi/cxgb4i/cxgb4i.c:942:3: error: too many arguments to function
'send_tx_flowc_wr'
send_tx_flowc_wr(c
Hi Hannes,
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:07:51 +0100 Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
> On 11/04/2014 05:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/sched.h:17:0, from
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2014 05:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/sched.h:17:0, from
> include/linux/blkdev.h:4,
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/sched.h:17:0,
from include/linux/blkdev.h:4,
from drivers/scsi/constants.c:10:
drivers/scsi/constants.c: In function 'sc
Thanks, I've folded that patch into the one that caused the issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/2014 03:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c: In function 'scsi_io_completion':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_li
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c: In function 'scsi_io_completion':
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1048:5: error: implicit declaration of function
'SCSI_LOG_LEVEL' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On 09/26/2014 04:57 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 10:36 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 06:34:50PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like thi
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 10:36 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 06:34:50PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/scsi/ipr.c: In function 'ipr_
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 06:34:50PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c: In function 'ipr_handle_log_data':
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:2468:15: error: 'IPR_IOASC_HW_CMD_F
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/ipr.c: In function 'ipr_handle_log_data':
drivers/scsi/ipr.c:2468:15: error: 'IPR_IOASC_HW_CMD_FAILED' undeclared (first
use in this function)
if (ioasc == IPR_IOASC_HW_CMD_
Quoting James Bottomley :
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 11:35 -0600, Brian King wrote:
On 01/11/2013 10:05 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:37:17PM +, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 09:27 -0600, Brian King wrote:
>>> It looks like this was a due to the fact that the
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 11:35 -0600, Brian King wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 10:05 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:37:17PM +, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 09:27 -0600, Brian King wrote:
> >>> It looks like this was a due to the fact that the new patches
> >>> adde
On 01/11/2013 10:05 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:37:17PM +, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 09:27 -0600, Brian King wrote:
>>> It looks like this was a due to the fact that the new patches
>>> added __devinit tags in the same merge window the __devinit tag
>>>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:37:17PM +, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 09:27 -0600, Brian King wrote:
> > It looks like this was a due to the fact that the new patches
> > added __devinit tags in the same merge window the __devinit tag
> > itself was getting removed.
>
> Not exac
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 09:27 -0600, Brian King wrote:
> It looks like this was a due to the fact that the new patches
> added __devinit tags in the same merge window the __devinit tag
> itself was getting removed.
Not exactly. The patch which makes them nops went into 3.8. Now
there's a patch que
It looks like this was a due to the fact that the new patches
added __devinit tags in the same merge window the __devinit tag
itself was getting removed.
As to the sparse warnings, this patch fixed the ones that
were actual bugs in the new code, although we could have
made that more clear in the p
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 12:03 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9138:22: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
> '__attribute__' before 'ipr_enable_msix'
> driv
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9138:22: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before 'ipr_enable_msix'
drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9165:22: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribu
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 10:41 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/base/dd.c:27:28: fatal error: scsi/scsi_scan.h: No such file or
> directory
>
> Caused by commit eea03c20ae3
Hi James,
After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/base/dd.c:27:28: fatal error: scsi/scsi_scan.h: No such file or
directory
Caused by commit eea03c20ae38 ("Make wait_for_device_probe() also do
scsi_complete_async_scans()") from L
45 matches
Mail list logo
