Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> ld: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822ce.o:(.rodata.rtw_pm_ops+0x0):
> multiple definition of `rtw_pm_ops';
>
Hi all,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
ld: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822ce.o:(.rodata.rtw_pm_ops+0x0):
multiple definition of `rtw_pm_ops';
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:08:08 -0400 (EDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:00:24 +1000
>
> > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:27:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> After
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:08:08 -0400 (EDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:00:24 +1000
>
> > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:27:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
>
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:00:24 +1000
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:27:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
>> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:00:24 +1000
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:27:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
>> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>>
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:27:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/qtnfmac/core.c: In function
>
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:27:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/qtnfmac/core.c: In function
> 'qtnf_core_net_attach':
>
Hi Kalle,
On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:07:00 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:43:18 -0700 Igor Mitsyanko
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> thanks. As I understand, you've applied this
Hi Kalle,
On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:07:00 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:43:18 -0700 Igor Mitsyanko
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> thanks. As I understand, you've applied this patch during a merge and no
> >> further actions are required, correct?
>
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Igor,
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:43:18 -0700 Igor Mitsyanko
> wrote:
>>
>> thanks. As I understand, you've applied this patch during a merge and no
>> further actions are required, correct?
>
> Dave Miller
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Igor,
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:43:18 -0700 Igor Mitsyanko
> wrote:
>>
>> thanks. As I understand, you've applied this patch during a merge and no
>> further actions are required, correct?
>
> Dave Miller will need to apply that patch (or something similar) when
Hi Igor,
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:43:18 -0700 Igor Mitsyanko
wrote:
>
> thanks. As I understand, you've applied this patch during a merge and no
> further actions are required, correct?
Dave Miller will need to apply that patch (or something similar) when
he
Hi Igor,
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 19:43:18 -0700 Igor Mitsyanko
wrote:
>
> thanks. As I understand, you've applied this patch during a merge and no
> further actions are required, correct?
Dave Miller will need to apply that patch (or something similar) when
he merges the wireless-drivers-next tree
On 06/07/2017 07:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
External Email
Hi all,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/qtnfmac/core.c: In function
'qtnf_core_net_attach':
On 06/07/2017 07:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
External Email
Hi all,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/qtnfmac/core.c: In function
'qtnf_core_net_attach':
Hi all,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/qtnfmac/core.c: In function
'qtnf_core_net_attach':
drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/qtnfmac/core.c:319:5: error: 'struct net_device'
has no
Hi all,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/qtnfmac/core.c: In function
'qtnf_core_net_attach':
drivers/net/wireless/quantenna/qtnfmac/core.c:319:5: error: 'struct net_device'
has no
Brian Norris writes:
> Just to head this off, since I noticed it...
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:08:59PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Rafał Miłecki writes:
>> > I sent a patch seconds ago, you may just take a look at it. If you
>> > still prefer
Brian Norris writes:
> Just to head this off, since I noticed it...
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:08:59PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Rafał Miłecki writes:
>> > I sent a patch seconds ago, you may just take a look at it. If you
>> > still prefer to revert my commit, go ahead.
>>
>> Ok, let's
Hi Brian,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:39:13 -0700 Brian Norris
wrote:
>
> I applied a trivial change to this same Kconfig entry:
>
> Subject: mtd: update description of MTD_BCM47XXSFLASH symbol
>
Hi Brian,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:39:13 -0700 Brian Norris
wrote:
>
> I applied a trivial change to this same Kconfig entry:
>
> Subject: mtd: update description of MTD_BCM47XXSFLASH symbol
> http://git.infradead.org/l2-mtd.git/commitdiff/0a526341fee054c1e2b9f0e4b2b424ae81707d4c
>
> It's a
Just to head this off, since I noticed it...
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:08:59PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Rafał Miłecki writes:
> > I sent a patch seconds ago, you may just take a look at it. If you
> > still prefer to revert my commit, go ahead.
>
> Ok, let's try your fix.
Just to head this off, since I noticed it...
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:08:59PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Rafał Miłecki writes:
> > I sent a patch seconds ago, you may just take a look at it. If you
> > still prefer to revert my commit, go ahead.
>
> Ok, let's try your fix. We still have few
Rafał Miłecki writes:
> On 19 July 2016 at 09:09, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Rafał Miłecki writes:
>>
>>> On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo wrote:
Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
Rafał Miłecki writes:
> On 19 July 2016 at 09:09, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Rafał Miłecki writes:
>>
>>> On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo wrote:
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed
On 19 July 2016 at 09:09, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Rafał Miłecki writes:
>
>> On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>>>
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's
On 19 July 2016 at 09:09, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Rafał Miłecki writes:
>
>> On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>>>
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
Rafał Miłecki writes:
> On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>>
>>> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
>>> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>>
Rafał Miłecki writes:
> On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>>
>>> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
>>> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c: In function
On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
>> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
>> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c: In function
On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
>> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
>> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c: In function 'bcm47xxsflash_bcma_probe':
>>
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c: In function 'bcm47xxsflash_bcma_probe':
> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c:299:17:
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c: In function 'bcm47xxsflash_bcma_probe':
> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c:299:17: error: implicit declaration
Hi all,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c: In function 'bcm47xxsflash_bcma_probe':
drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c:299:17: error: implicit declaration of
function
Hi all,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c: In function 'bcm47xxsflash_bcma_probe':
drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c:299:17: error: implicit declaration of
function
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> failed the same way as the net-next tree did yesterday (suprise! :-)).
>
> I have used the version from next-20160218 for today.
Yeah, not a surprise as yesterday I fast
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> failed the same way as the net-next tree did yesterday (suprise! :-)).
>
> I have used the version from next-20160218 for today.
Yeah, not a surprise as yesterday I fast forwarded
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
failed the same way as the net-next tree did yesterday (suprise! :-)).
I have used the version from next-20160218 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
failed the same way as the net-next tree did yesterday (suprise! :-)).
I have used the version from next-20160218 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug_sta.c: In function 'read_file_node_aggr':
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug_sta.c:54:25: error:
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au writes:
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug_sta.c: In function 'read_file_node_aggr':
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug_sta.c: In function 'read_file_node_aggr':
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug_sta.c:54:25: error: 'struct ath_node' has
no member named
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug_sta.c: In function 'read_file_node_aggr':
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug_sta.c:54:25: error: 'struct ath_node' has
no member named
Hi Kalle,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:41:49 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> > After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> > (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR: "of_default_bus_match_table" [drivers/bcma/bcma.ko] undefined!
> >
Hi Kalle,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:41:49 +0300 Kalle Valo kv...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au writes:
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: of_default_bus_match_table
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "of_default_bus_match_table" [drivers/bcma/bcma.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> cae761b5a6bd ("bcma: populate bus DT
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au writes:
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: of_default_bus_match_table [drivers/bcma/bcma.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
cae761b5a6bd (bcma: populate
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "of_default_bus_match_table" [drivers/bcma/bcma.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> cae761b5a6bd ("bcma: populate bus DT
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au writes:
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: of_default_bus_match_table [drivers/bcma/bcma.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
cae761b5a6bd (bcma: populate
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "of_default_bus_match_table" [drivers/bcma/bcma.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
cae761b5a6bd ("bcma: populate bus DT subnodes as platform_device-s")
I have used
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: of_default_bus_match_table [drivers/bcma/bcma.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
cae761b5a6bd (bcma: populate bus DT subnodes as platform_device-s)
I have used the
Hi Arend,
On Wed, 27 May 2015 11:08:35 +0200 Arend van Spriel wrote:
>
> On 05/27/15 04:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> > (arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >
On 05/27/15 04:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c: In function
'brcmf_ops_sdio_probe':
On 05/27/15 04:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c: In function
'brcmf_ops_sdio_probe':
Hi Arend,
On Wed, 27 May 2015 11:08:35 +0200 Arend van Spriel ar...@broadcom.com wrote:
On 05/27/15 04:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c: In function
'brcmf_ops_sdio_probe':
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c:1139:7: error: dereferencing
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(arm multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c: In function
'brcmf_ops_sdio_probe':
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c:1139:7: error: dereferencing
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k_htc.o:(.data+0x29d0): multiple
> definition of `led_blink'
>
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k_htc.o:(.data+0x29d0): multiple definition
of `led_blink'
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.o:(.bss+0x1654): first defined here
Hi Kalle,
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k_htc.o:(.data+0x29d0): multiple definition
of `led_blink'
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.o:(.bss+0x1654): first defined here
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au writes:
After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k_htc.o:(.data+0x29d0): multiple
definition of `led_blink'
62 matches
Mail list logo