Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, yesterday's linux-next build
(htmldocs) produced this warning:
mm/vmalloc.c:425: warning: expecting prototype for vunmap_range_noflush().
Prototype was for vunmap_range() instead
Introduced by commit
cde193f42509 ("mm/vmalloc: remove
Em Tue, 16 Mar 2021 17:09:20 -0600
Jonathan Corbet escreveu:
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
>
> [Adding Mauro]
>
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:18:11 -0700 Minchan Kim wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:35:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > After merging the
Stephen Rothwell writes:
[Adding Mauro]
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:18:11 -0700 Minchan Kim wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:35:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
>> > produced this warning:
Hi Minchan,
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:18:11 -0700 Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:35:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> >
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 04:35:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced this warning:
>
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-cma:2: WARNING: Inline interpreted
> text or phrase reference
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-cma:2: WARNING: Inline interpreted
text or phrase reference start-string without end-string.
Introduced by commit
439d477342a3 ("mm: cma: support
Thanks for the report Stephen!
Andrew, I have sent you an updated patch. Please let me know if you prefer
a follow-up fix instead.
BR,
Georgi
On 12/10/20 11:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Documentation/vm/page_owner.rst:44: WARNING: Literal block ends without a blank
line; unexpected unindent.
Documentation/vm/page_owner.rst:49: WARNING: Literal block ends without a blank
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 05:01:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in lib/cmdline_kunit.o
>
> Introduced by commit
>
>
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in lib/cmdline_kunit.o
Introduced by commit
f1a15df76475 ("lib/cmdline_kunit: add a new test suite for cmdline API")
--
Cheers,
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
include/linux/kfence.h:138: warning: Function parameter or member 'addr' not
described in 'kfence_object_start'
Introduced by patch
mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure
--
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 06:45:04PM +1100, Anand K. Mistry wrote:
> SNIPPED
>
> > >
> > > Looks like left column became too wide, so rather than shift the right
> > > column to the right, I'd suggest to drop underscores in Speculation*.
> >
> > Hm. That makes it inconsistent with
Hi Anand,
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 19:00:11 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 18:42:23 +1100 "Anand K. Mistry"
> wrote:
> >
> > How would I go about fixing this? Send a new (v2), fixed patch to the
> > mailing list? I'm not that familiar with how patches get merged
> > through
Hi Anand,
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 18:42:23 +1100 "Anand K. Mistry" wrote:
>
> How would I go about fixing this? Send a new (v2), fixed patch to the
> mailing list? I'm not that familiar with how patches get merged
> through the branches.
Since this is in Andrew's quilt series, either a v2, or an
SNIPPED
> >
> > Looks like left column became too wide, so rather than shift the right
> > column to the right, I'd suggest to drop underscores in Speculation*.
>
> Hm. That makes it inconsistent with Speculation_Store_Bypass. I guess
> it's the lesser of two evils.
Oh, do you mean renaming the
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 18:03, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 05:45:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> > produced this warning:
> >
> > Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst:296: WARNING:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 05:45:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced this warning:
>
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst:296: WARNING: Malformed table.
> Text in column margin in table line 61.
>
>
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
produced this warning:
Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst:296: WARNING: Malformed table.
Text in column margin in table line 61.
== ===
Field
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 06:03, 'David Gow' via kasan-dev
wrote:
>
> [+kasan-dev, +kunit-dev]
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:01 PM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >
>
Hi David,
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:03:08 +0800 David Gow wrote:
>
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c: In function
> > 'common_nfc_set_geometry':
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c:514:3: warning: initialization
> > discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type
[+kasan-dev, +kunit-dev]
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:01 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from lib/test_kasan_module.c:16:
> lib/../mm/kasan/kasan.h:232:6:
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from lib/test_kasan_module.c:16:
lib/../mm/kasan/kasan.h:232:6: warning: conflicting types for built-in function
'__asan_register_globals'; expected 'void(void *,
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
mm/madvise.c: In function 'madvise_inject_error':
mm/madvise.c:875:15: warning: unused variable 'zone' [-Wunused-variable]
875 | struct zone *zone;
| ^~~~
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:31:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> mm/vmstat.c:614: warning: "MAX_THRESHOLD" redefined
> 614 | #define MAX_THRESHOLD 0
> |
>
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
mm/vmstat.c:614: warning: "MAX_THRESHOLD" redefined
614 | #define MAX_THRESHOLD 0
|
mm/vmstat.c:172: note: this is the location of the previous definition
172 |
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (i386
defconfig) produced this warning:
mm/hugetlb.c:49:20: warning: 'hugetlb_cma' defined but not used
[-Wunused-variable]
49 | static struct cma *hugetlb_cma[MAX_NUMNODES];
|^~~
Maybe
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in lib/test_bits.o
Introduced by commit
37f7d07028d1 ("lib/test_bits.c: add tests of GENMASK")
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rikard,
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:29:17 +0200 Rikard Falkeborn
wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen, Andrew
>
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:00:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
Hi Stephen, Andrew
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:00:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/bits.h:22,
> from
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/bits.h:22,
from arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h:5,
from arch/x86/boot/cpucheck.c:28:
include/linux/build_bug.h:49:
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 16:39 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Miles,
>
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 14:30:03 +0800 Miles Chen wrote:
> >
> > It's the first time that I receive a build warning after the patch has
> > been merged to -mm tree. The build warning had been fixed by Qian,
> > should I send
Hi Miles,
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 14:30:03 +0800 Miles Chen wrote:
>
> It's the first time that I receive a build warning after the patch has
> been merged to -mm tree. The build warning had been fixed by Qian,
> should I send another change for this?
No, that will do.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Thu 01-08-19 14:30:03, Miles Chen wrote:
[...]
> It's the first time that I receive a build warning after the patch has
> been merged to -mm tree. The build warning had been fixed by Qian,
> should I send another change for this?
No need. Andrew has already picked up the fix for mmotm tree
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 08:15 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 01-08-19 15:51:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Miles,
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:28:04 +0800 Miles Chen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 16:11 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After merging the
On Thu 01-08-19 15:51:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Miles,
>
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:28:04 +0800 Miles Chen wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 16:11 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > ppc64_defconfig)
Hi Miles,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:28:04 +0800 Miles Chen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 16:11 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > mm/memcontrol.c: In function
On 2019/7/31 14:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:1493:13: warning: 'ocfs2_xa_add_entry' defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
static void
On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 16:11 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'invalidate_reclaim_iterators':
> mm/memcontrol.c:1160:11: warning: suggest
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:1493:13: warning: 'ocfs2_xa_add_entry' defined but not used
[-Wunused-function]
static void ocfs2_xa_add_entry(struct ocfs2_xa_loc *loc, u32 name_hash)
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'invalidate_reclaim_iterators':
mm/memcontrol.c:1160:11: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as
truth value [-Wparentheses]
}
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c: In function 'siw_free_plist':
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c:66:16: warning: unused variable 'p'
[-Wunused-variable]
struct page **p =
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
lib/rbtree_test.c: In function 'check_augmented':
lib/rbtree_test.c:220:18: warning: unused variable 'rb' [-Wunused-variable]
struct rb_node *rb;
^~
Introduced
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 6:55 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> net/tipc/sysctl.c:42:12: warning: 'one' defined but not used
> [-Wunused-variable]
> static int one = 1;
>
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
net/tipc/sysctl.c:42:12: warning: 'one' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
static int one = 1;
^~~
net/tipc/sysctl.c:41:12: warning: 'zero' defined but not used
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:52:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:39:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > lib/list_sort.c:17:36:
Hi all,
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:39:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> lib/list_sort.c:17:36: warning: 'pure' attribute ignored [-Wattributes]
>struct list_head const *,
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
lib/list_sort.c:17:36: warning: 'pure' attribute ignored [-Wattributes]
struct list_head const *, struct list_head const *);
^
Hi all,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:45,
from arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:6,
from include/linux/sched.h:12,
from
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from fs/fat/inode.c:24:0:
fs/fat/inode.c: In function '__fat_get_block':
fs/fat/inode.c:163:9: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long
int', but
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from fs/fat/inode.c:24:0:
fs/fat/inode.c: In function '__fat_get_block':
fs/fat/inode.c:163:9: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long
int', but
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:47:54AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/07/2018 07:10 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:39:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 05/03/2018 09:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi Andrew,
> >>>
> >>> After merging the akpm-current tree,
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:47:54AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/07/2018 07:10 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:39:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 05/03/2018 09:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi Andrew,
> >>>
> >>> After merging the akpm-current tree,
On 05/07/2018 07:10 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:39:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/03/2018 09:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build
>>> (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>>>
On 05/07/2018 07:10 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:39:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/03/2018 09:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build
>>> (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>>>
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:39:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 09:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build
> > (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: In function
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:39:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 09:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build
> > (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: In function
On 05/03/2018 09:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: In function 'read_block_state':
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:674:16: warning: format
On 05/03/2018 09:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: In function 'read_block_state':
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:674:16: warning: format
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: In function 'read_block_state':
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:674:16: warning: format '%llu' expects argument
of type 'long long unsigned int',
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c: In function 'read_block_state':
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:674:16: warning: format '%llu' expects argument
of type 'long long unsigned int',
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'memory_events_show':
mm/memcontrol.c:5453:23: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
[-Warray-bounds]
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'memory_events_show':
mm/memcontrol.c:5453:23: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
[-Warray-bounds]
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
WARNING: vmlinux: 'abort' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
WARNING: vmlinux: 'abort' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
Introduced by commit
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
WARNING: vmlinux: 'abort' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
WARNING: vmlinux: 'abort' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
Introduced by commit
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
mm/khugepaged.c: In function 'khugepaged':
mm/khugepaged.c:1757:31: warning: 'vma' may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
mm/khugepaged.c: In function 'khugepaged':
mm/khugepaged.c:1757:31: warning: 'vma' may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
fs/super.c: In function 'sget_userns':
fs/super.c:521:2: warning: ignoring return value of 'register_shrinker',
declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
fs/super.c: In function 'sget_userns':
fs/super.c:521:2: warning: ignoring return value of 'register_shrinker',
declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:44:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:43:08 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:44:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:43:08 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06,
Hi,
On 2017/11/17 11:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:44:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:43:08 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko
Hi,
On 2017/11/17 11:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:44:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:43:08 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen
Hi all,
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:44:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:43:08 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen
Hi all,
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:44:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:43:08 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> After merging the
Hi all,
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:43:08 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>
Hi all,
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:43:08 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> >> ppc64_defconfig) produced this
On Mon 13-11-17 12:54:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 12:43:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >> Hi Andrew,
> > >>
> > >> After merging the akpm-current tree,
On Mon 13-11-17 12:54:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 12:43:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >> Hi Andrew,
> > >>
> > >> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 12:43:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> >> Hi Andrew,
>> >>
>> >> After merging
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 12:43:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> >> Hi Andrew,
>> >>
>> >> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's
On Mon 13-11-17 12:43:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> >> ppc64_defconfig)
On Mon 13-11-17 12:43:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> >> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> In file included from
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0,
On Mon 13-11-17 09:09:55, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0,
>
On Mon 13-11-17 09:09:55, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0,
>
On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0,
> from include/linux/mempolicy.h:10,
>
On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0,
> from include/linux/mempolicy.h:10,
>
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/printk.h:7:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:14,
from lib/test_find_bit.c:28:
lib/test_find_bit.c: In function
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/printk.h:7:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:14,
from lib/test_find_bit.c:28:
lib/test_find_bit.c: In function
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0,
from include/linux/mempolicy.h:10,
from mm/mempolicy.c:70:
mm/mempolicy.c: In function
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0,
from include/linux/mempolicy.h:10,
from mm/mempolicy.c:70:
mm/mempolicy.c: In function
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
fs/proc/task_mmu.c: In function 'show_map_vma':
fs/proc/task_mmu.c:285:28: warning: unused variable 'priv' [-Wunused-variable]
struct proc_maps_private *priv = m->private;
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
fs/proc/task_mmu.c: In function 'show_map_vma':
fs/proc/task_mmu.c:285:28: warning: unused variable 'priv' [-Wunused-variable]
struct proc_maps_private *priv = m->private;
On 05/26/2017 05:16 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 12:43 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c: In function 'force_metapage':
On 05/26/2017 05:16 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 12:43 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c: In function 'force_metapage':
On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 12:43 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c: In function 'force_metapage':
> fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:714:2: warning: ignoring
On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 12:43 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c: In function 'force_metapage':
> fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:714:2: warning: ignoring
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c: In function 'force_metapage':
fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:714:2: warning: ignoring return value of
'write_one_page', declared with attribute
Hi Andrew,
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c: In function 'force_metapage':
fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c:714:2: warning: ignoring return value of
'write_one_page', declared with attribute
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo