Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)

2013-01-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Vinod, On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 00:17:35 -0800 Vinod Koul wrote: > > I think I was trying to remove it. Anyway I have changed the commit to remove > this and also another instance. So you should be happy about it :) Thanks. I would have been even happier if you had just added another commit that r

Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)

2013-01-08 Thread Vinod Koul
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:19:12AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > @Vinod: I hope you can edit this patch yourself? Done, I have removed this and another instance -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org

Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)

2013-01-08 Thread Vinod Koul
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:43:08PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:35:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Vinod, > > > > In commit 548860697046 ("dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree > > support") (which was changed since yesterday :-(), an instance of > > _

Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)

2013-01-08 Thread Vinod Koul
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:35:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > In commit 548860697046 ("dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree > support") (which was changed since yesterday :-(), Yes due to build conflict I redid the rebase of my tree. > an instance of > __devinit has been ad

Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)

2013-01-07 Thread Viresh Kumar
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > In commit 548860697046 ("dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree > support") (which was changed since yesterday :-(), an instance of > __devinit has been added. We are in the process of making CONFIG_HOTPLUG > always true, and since commit

Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)

2013-01-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:43:08 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > That brings up something I wanted to ask you. > > I'd like to send a patch to Linus to just delete __devinit and friends > entirely from init.h, but that will break the linux-next tree from > building in places (like this

Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)

2013-01-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:35:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > In commit 548860697046 ("dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree > support") (which was changed since yesterday :-(), an instance of > __devinit has been added. We are in the process of making CONFIG_HOTPLUG > alway

linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)

2013-01-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Vinod, In commit 548860697046 ("dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support") (which was changed since yesterday :-(), an instance of __devinit has been added. We are in the process of making CONFIG_HOTPLUG always true, and since commit 78d86c213f28 ("init.h: Remove __dev* sections from th