Hi Frank,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:41:00 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:07:01 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable
> >> via my http://linux-next.f-seidel
Hello Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:07:01 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable
>> via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads").
>> Is that what you were looking for?
>
> I was goi
Greg KH wrote:
> Any reason we can't get these on kernel.org so that the mirror system
> will kick in for the whole world?
Only that i don't have a kernel.org account ;-) But Stephen has and
i suppose he'll put it there.
Thanks,
Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Looks close. It needs to be scriptable (not just a dynamically generated
> link) and have predictable names. As long as those are true, then it
> should be great.
Yes, i would have scripted it when it tourned out to be of use for others.
But as i just saw Stephen already ha
Hi Frank,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:07:01 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable
> via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads").
> Is that what you were looking for?
I was going to start providing tarballs yeste
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 16:12 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Frank Seidel wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> I'd like to see tarballs too, please...
> >
> > Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable
> > via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads").
> > Is that what
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:07:01AM +0100, Frank Seidel wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > I'd like to see tarballs too, please...
>
> Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable
> via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads").
> Is that what you were looking for?
An
Frank Seidel wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
I'd like to see tarballs too, please...
Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable
via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads").
Is that what you were looking for?
Looks close. It needs to be scriptable (not just a d
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> I'd like to see tarballs too, please...
Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable
via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads").
Is that what you were looking for?
Thanks,
Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:23:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 + Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases
> > as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this w
Hi Andy,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 + Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases
> as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this with the -next
> tree once it gets going. Having just pulled this tree i
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:24:14 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:38:50 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Please add v4l-dvb tree, at:
> >
> > ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-next.g
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:11:33 +0100 "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would like to update the "The development process" section in
> Documentation/HOWTO including some information about the linux-next tree.
>
> I understand what it's including but I didn't get how it w
On Feb 14, 2008 2:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
Hi Stephen,
I would like to update the "The development process" section in
Documentation/HOWTO including some information about the linux-next tree.
I underst
Hi Artem,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:04:17 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The UBI tree which is here:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/~dedekind/ubi-2.6.git master
Added, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpeNJ4XqKixk.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Also, more trees please ... :-)
The UBI tree which is here:
git://git.infradead.org/~dedekind/ubi-2.6.git master
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
Hi Mark,
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:09:57 -0500 "Mark M. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can add the hwmon testing tree (from MAINTAINERS):
>
> > git lm-sensors.org:/kernel/mhoffman/hwmon-2.6.git testing
>
> This tree gets rebased pretty much whenever Linus adds a new tag. As a
> rule
Hi Stephen:
* Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-15 00:35:37 +1100]:
> I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>
> Things to know about this tree:
>
> It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is
Hi Robin,
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:23:47 -0500 Robin Getz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can grab (i386 rpms and tar ball) that should work from:
>
> http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs/?action=FrsReleaseView&release_id=375
>
> You will need:
> - toolchain blackfin-toolchain-
On Sat 16 Feb 2008 10:33, Stephen Rothwell pondered:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:33:50 +0800 "Bryan Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could you please add Blackfin tree to the linux-next
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git
> > for-linus
>
> Added, th
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:13:40 +0100 (CET) Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Stephen, please add the for-next branch of linux1394-2.6.git to your
> tree to receive updates for drivers/firewire/ and drivers/ieee1394/.
> The URL is
>
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ieee1
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:00:57 -0500 "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And 'nfsd-next' at
>
> git://git.linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git nfsd-next
Added, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpflTt6G2U1N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:33:50 +0800 "Bryan Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could you please add Blackfin tree to the linux-next
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git
> for-linus
Added, thanks.
> And do you have the blackfin cross-compile toolchain?
No, I
On 15 Feb, Stephen Rothwell wrote at LKML:
> I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>
> Things to know about this tree:
>
> It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is currently just Linus'
> tree and will
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 05:27:57PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 00:35 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Also, more trees please ... :-)
>
> Please add the 'linux-next' branch of
>
> git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git
And 'nfsd-next' at
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>
> Things to know about this tree:
>
> It has two branches - master and stable.
Hi Len,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:58:38 -0500 Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rafael has it right, please add the branch above.
> It will include both the upcoming ACPI and suspend patches.
Added, thanks, with you as contact.
> Note that I reserve the right to re-base it from time to time
On Thursday 14 February 2008 10:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you can add:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test
>
> I would prefer that th
Hi David,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:10:42 +1100 David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I notice that the
> > MAINTAINERS file has a different contact for XFS.
>
> Yup - [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you want a real person
> on the end of problem reports feel free to leave me there,
> but you should r
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:50:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:17:02 +1100 David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The current XFS tree that goes into -mm is:
> >
> > git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git master
>
> Added, thanks.
>
> I have p
Hi David,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:17:02 +1100 David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The current XFS tree that goes into -mm is:
>
> git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git master
Added, thanks.
I have put you as the contact point - is this correct? I notice that the
MAINTAINERS file has a
Hi Trond,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:27:57 -0500 Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please add the 'linux-next' branch of
>
> git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git
Added, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:03:19 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please add the 'NEXT' branch of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
>
> to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often.
Added, thanks.
> I will continu
Hi Sam,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:50:31 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A non-intrusive way to do so would be to add a file in the
> top-level directory and name it localversion*.
>
> For example:
> echo '-next' > localversion-next
Excellent, I will do this for the next release.
Hi Sam,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:23:23 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild.git master
Added, thanks.
> It is rebased from time to time and is what gets into -mm
That's fine.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EM
Hi Greg,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:20:32 -0800 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could you change the Makefile to show that if we build and run this
> tree, it really isn't Linus's tree? Yes, I know the -git number will be
> different, but that might not be very obvious to people reading bug
>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Also, more trees please ... :-)
The current XFS tree that goes into -mm is:
git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git master
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
--
To unsubscribe from th
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 00:35 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Also, more trees please ... :-)
Please add the 'linux-next' branch of
git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git
Cheers
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
Hi Mauro,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:38:50 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Please add v4l-dvb tree, at:
>
> ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-next.git
>
> The above tree has two branches: 'master' and 'stable'
>
> Both branches will have V4L/
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:54:02 -0600 Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please add:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shaggy/jfs-2.6.git next
Added, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgp0s5
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:49:28 +0900 Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For SH:
>
> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git
Added, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpsZoqKbvwi
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:25:09 +0100 Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the s390 architecture please use the "features" branch of git390:
>
> git://git390.osdl.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6.git features
Added thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EM
James Bottomley wrote:
So does this indicate the meaning of upstream and upstream-fixes is
still the same? I always took upstream-fixes to be bug fixes for this
-rc and upstream as queued for the next merge window, in which case NEXT
would be the union of those two sets?
In practice, #upstrea
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 16:03 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Also, more trees please ... :-)
>
> Please add the 'NEXT' branch of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
>
> to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Please add the 'NEXT' branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often.
Additional FYI:
Don't be worried if "git diff master..NEXT" is empty from time to time.
This condition
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Also, more trees please ... :-)
Please add the 'NEXT' branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often.
The 'master' branch of libata-dev.git always contains the base co
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:20:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > So, comments, please.
>
> Could you change the Makefile to show that if we build and run this
> tree, it really isn't Linus's tree? Yes, I know the -git number wil
>
> Also, more trees please ... :-)
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild.git master
It is rebased from time to time and is what gets into -mm
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> So, comments, please.
Could you change the Makefile to show that if we build and run this
tree, it really isn't Linus's tree? Yes, I know the -git number will be
different, but that might not be very obvious to people reading
On Feb. 14, 2008, 20:29 +0200, "Yinghai Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>>
>>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>
> Things to know about this tree:
>
> It has two branches - master and stable.
> The tree currently contains:
> Greg's driver-core, pci and usb quilt series (in that order)
> Alasdair Kergon's device-mapper quilt tree
> Jiri Kosina's hid git tree
> Jean Delvare's i2c quilt tree
> Randy Dunlap's kernel-doc quilt tree
> Haavard Skinnemoen's
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>
> Things to know about this tree:
>
> It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is c
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 02:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and
> they can tell me which branch represents their expectations for the next
> kernel release (in this case 2.6.26). But thanks, hopefully you will have
> prodded them
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:00:19AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you can add:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test
>
> I would prefer t
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 02:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and
> they can tell me which branch represents their expectations for the next
> kernel release (in this case 2.6.26). But thanks, hopefully you will have
> prodded them
Hi Rafael,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Perhaps you can add:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test
I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and
they can tell me which branch
On Thursday, 14 of February 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
>
> Things to know about this tree:
>
> It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is currently
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:06:28 +0100 (CET) Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > The tree consists of subsystem git and quilt trees. Currently, the
> > quilt trees are integrated by importing them into appropriately based
> > git branches an
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The tree consists of subsystem git and quilt trees. Currently, the
> quilt trees are integrated by importing them into appropriately based
> git branches and then merging those branches.
Now, would it be possible to have somewhere listed the URL
Hi all,
I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
Things to know about this tree:
It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is currently just Linus'
tree and will never rebase. Master will rebase on an almost
61 matches
Mail list logo