Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree

2021-04-15 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 15/04/2021 à 12:08, Christophe Leroy a écrit : Le 15/04/2021 à 12:07, Christophe Leroy a écrit : Le 15/04/2021 à 11:58, Stephen Rothwell a écrit : Hi all, On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:44:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree

2021-04-15 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 15/04/2021 à 12:07, Christophe Leroy a écrit : Le 15/04/2021 à 11:58, Stephen Rothwell a écrit : Hi all, On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:44:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:    arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c between commit:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree

2021-04-15 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 15/04/2021 à 11:58, Stephen Rothwell a écrit : Hi all, On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:44:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c between commit: 2ec13df16704 ("powerpc/modules: Load modules

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree

2021-04-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:44:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c > > between commit: > > 2ec13df16704 ("powerpc/modules: Load modules closer to kernel text") > > from the powerpc

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree

2021-04-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c between commit: 2ec13df16704 ("powerpc/modules: Load modules closer to kernel text") from the powerpc tree and commit: 4930ba789f8d ("powerpc/64s/radix: enable huge vmalloc

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

2021-04-13 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:59:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > diff --cc lib/test_kasan.c > index 785e724ce0d8,bf9225002a7e.. > --- a/lib/test_kasan.c > +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c > @@@ -78,33 -83,30 +83,35 @@@ static void kasan_test_exit(struct kuni >* fields, it can reorder or

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

2021-04-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: lib/test_kasan.c between commits: 2603f8a78dfb ("kasan: Add KASAN mode kernel parameter") e80a76aa1a91 ("kasan, arm64: tests supports for HW_TAGS async mode") from the arm64 tree and commit: c616ba7e0d63

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kbuild tree

2021-04-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:34:49 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > Makefile This also affected init/Kconfig > between commit: > > 2f8864dbe668 ("kbuild: move module strip/compression code into >

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kbuild tree

2021-04-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: Makefile between commit: 2f8864dbe668 ("kbuild: move module strip/compression code into scripts/Makefile.modinst") from the kbuild tree and commit: 7b35c1a01c2e ("init: add support for zstd compressed

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

2021-04-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: block/blk-settings.c between commit: 9bb33f24abbd ("block: refactor the bounce buffering code") from the block tree and commit: 1d4982a2dc66 ("include: remove pagemap.h from blkdev.h") from the akpm-current

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree

2021-04-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: kernel/watchdog.c between commit: 89e28ce60cb6 ("workqueue/watchdog: Make unbound workqueues aware of touch_softlockup_watchdog() 84;0;0c84;0;0c There are two workqueue-specific watchdog timestamps:") (pity

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the gpio-brgl tree

2021-03-29 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:07 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > include/linux/bitmap.h > > between commit: > > f7d5fbad07a4 ("lib: bitmap: order includes alphabetically") > > from the gpio-brgl tree and commit:

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the gpio-brgl tree

2021-03-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: include/linux/bitmap.h between commit: f7d5fbad07a4 ("lib: bitmap: order includes alphabetically") from the gpio-brgl tree and commit: f3b90426c407 ("kernel.h: drop inclusion in bitmap.h") from the

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2021-03-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/mm/init_64.c between commit: d9f6e12fb0b7 ("x86: Fix various typos in comments") from the tip tree and commit: 68f7bf6e7e98 ("x86/vmemmap: drop handling of 4K unaligned vmemmap range") from the

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

2021-03-18 Thread Jens Axboe
On 3/18/21 11:54 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:17 PM Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: >> >> mm/memcontrol.c >> >> between commit: >> >> 06d69d4c8669 ("mm: Charge active memcg when no mm

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

2021-03-18 Thread Shakeel Butt
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:17 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > mm/memcontrol.c > > between commit: > > 06d69d4c8669 ("mm: Charge active memcg when no mm is set") > > from the block tree and commit: > >

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

2021-03-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/memcontrol.c between commit: 06d69d4c8669 ("mm: Charge active memcg when no mm is set") from the block tree and commit: 674788258a66 ("memcg: charge before adding to swapcache on swapin") from the

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2021-03-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Tomorrow's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree will get a conflict in: Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt between commit: f6e5aedf470b ("riscv: Add support for memtest") from the risc-v tree and commit: 6b8f5ba8661b ("mm,memory_hotplug: add kernel boot option

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the fscache tree

2021-03-02 Thread David Howells
Stephen Rothwell wrote: > This is now a conflict between the fscache tree and Linus' tree. I've rebased to -rc1 and repushed. David

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the btrfs tree

2021-03-01 Thread David Sterba
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 06:16:26AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:32:50AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > - return filemap_read(iocb, to, ret); > > > > + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) > > > > + iocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_NOIO; > > > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the fscache tree

2021-02-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:24:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > include/linux/pagemap.h > > between commits: > > 13aecd8259dc ("mm: Implement readahead_control pageset expansion") > 9a28f7e68602 ("netfs:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the btrfs tree

2021-02-25 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:32:50AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > -return filemap_read(iocb, to, ret); > > > +if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) > > > +iocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_NOIO; > > > + > > > - ret = generic_file_buffered_read(iocb, to, ret); > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the btrfs tree

2021-02-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:46:34 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:39:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > > > fs/btrfs/file.c > > > > between commit: > > > > 0225a20db6d8 ("btrfs:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pidfd tree

2021-02-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:54:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:43:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > > > fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c > > > > between commit: > > > > 2f221d6f7b88

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pidfd tree

2021-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:43:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c > > between commit: > > 2f221d6f7b88 ("attr: handle idmapped mounts") > > from the pidfd tree and commit: > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the btrfs tree

2021-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:39:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > fs/btrfs/file.c > > between commit: > > 0225a20db6d8 ("btrfs: Prevent nowait or async read from doing sync IO") > > from the btrfs tree and

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the fscache tree

2021-02-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: include/linux/pagemap.h between commit: 13aecd8259dc ("mm: Implement readahead_control pageset expansion") from the fscache tree and commit: 3ad6bba07ad0 ("mm/filemap: add mapping_seek_hole_data") from the

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the fscache tree

2021-02-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: include/linux/pagemap.h between commits: 13aecd8259dc ("mm: Implement readahead_control pageset expansion") 9a28f7e68602 ("netfs: Rename unlock_page_fscache() and wait_on_page_fscache()") from the fscache tree

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree

2021-02-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: lib/cpumask.c between commit: 2452483d9546 ("Revert "lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs"") from Linus' tree and commits: 9eca9bb9bd98 ("lib: optimize cpumask_local_spread()")

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pidfd tree

2021-01-27 Thread Miaohe Lin
Hi: On 2021/1/27 19:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c > > between commit: > > 2f221d6f7b88 ("attr: handle idmapped mounts") > > from the pidfd tree and commit: > > 57d3629b7a9a

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the fscache tree

2021-01-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: include/linux/pagemap.h between commits: fa4910177245 ("vm: Add wait/unlock functions for PG_fscache") 13aecd8259dc ("mm: Implement readahead_control pageset expansion") from the fscache tree and commits:

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pidfd tree

2021-01-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c between commit: 2f221d6f7b88 ("attr: handle idmapped mounts") from the pidfd tree and commit: 57d3629b7a9a ("hugetlbfs: remove useless BUG_ON(!inode) in hugetlbfs_setattr()") from the

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the btrfs tree

2021-01-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: fs/btrfs/file.c between commit: 0225a20db6d8 ("btrfs: Prevent nowait or async read from doing sync IO") from the btrfs tree and commit: ddcd14c48a30 ("mm/filemap: rename generic_file_buffered_read to

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-12-17 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 01:40:51 PST (-0800), andy.shevche...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 3:28 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:21:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > lib/Makefile

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-12-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andy, On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:40:51 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Yeah, and it's slightly different. Perhaps RISC-V tree can handle this > by moving Makefile entry somewhere else in the file. Or just let Linus take care of it ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgprUxnfVtQtO.pgp

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-12-17 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 3:28 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:21:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > > > lib/Makefile > > > > between commit: > > > > 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-12-16 Thread Kefeng Wang
On 2020/12/17 9:26, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 18:34:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/riscv/Kconfig between commit: 5cb0080f1bfd ("riscv: Enable ARCH_STACKWALK") from the risc-v

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-12-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 18:34:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > arch/riscv/Kconfig > > between commit: > > 5cb0080f1bfd ("riscv: Enable ARCH_STACKWALK") > > from the risc-v tree and commit: > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-12-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:21:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > lib/Makefile > > between commit: > > 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()") > > from the risc-v tree and commits:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree

2020-12-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:40:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in: > > drivers/misc/lkdtm/Makefile > drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h > tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt > > between commit: > > 3ba150fb2120

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the bpf-next tree

2020-12-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jakub, On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:06:29 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > AFAIU all we can do is tell Linus about the merge issue, and point > at Stephen's resolution. This is the correct response. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgphDBS_HwAUg.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the bpf-next tree

2020-12-14 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:11:21 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:06:29 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Hm. The code is in net-next by now. I was thinking of sending the > > Networking PR later today (tonight?) as well. I'm happy to hold off > > or do whatever you require, but I'd

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the bpf-next tree

2020-12-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:06:29 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:40:21 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:29:43 -0800 Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 07:21:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 20:20:05 +1100

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the bpf-next tree

2020-12-14 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:40:21 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:29:43 -0800 Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 07:21:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 20:20:05 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the bpf-next tree

2020-12-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:29:43 -0800 Roman Gushchin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 07:21:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 20:20:05 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in: > > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the bpf-next tree

2020-12-14 Thread Roman Gushchin
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 07:21:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 20:20:05 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in: > > > > include/linux/memcontrol.h > > mm/memcontrol.c > > > > between

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-12-14 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:37:47 PST (-0800), andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 08:21:07PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: lib/Makefile between commit: 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the bpf-next tree

2020-12-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 20:20:05 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in: > > include/linux/memcontrol.h > mm/memcontrol.c > > between commit: > > bcfe06bf2622 ("mm: memcontrol: Use helpers to read page's memcg data") > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-12-14 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 08:21:07PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > lib/Makefile > > between commit: > > 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()") > > from the risc-v tree and

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-12-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: lib/Makefile between commit: 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()") from the risc-v tree and commits: 8250e121c672 ("lib/list_kunit: follow new file name convention for KUnit

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-12-11 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:56:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > mm/gup.c > > between commit: > > 2a4a06da8a4b ("mm/gup: Provide gup_get_pte() more generic") > > from the tip tree and commit: > >

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-12-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/gup.c between commit: 2a4a06da8a4b ("mm/gup: Provide gup_get_pte() more generic") from the tip tree and commit: 1eb2fe862a51 ("mm/gup: combine put_compound_head() and unpin_user_page()") from the

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree

2020-12-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in: drivers/misc/lkdtm/Makefile drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h tools/testing/selftests/lkdtm/tests.txt between commit: 3ba150fb2120 ("lkdtm/powerpc: Add SLB multihit test") from the powerpc tree and commit:

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the bpf-next tree

2020-12-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in: include/linux/memcontrol.h mm/memcontrol.c between commit: bcfe06bf2622 ("mm: memcontrol: Use helpers to read page's memcg data") from the bpf-next tree and commits: 6771a349b8c3 ("mm/memcg: remove incorrect

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

2020-12-03 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:06:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > diff --cc arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h > index d841a560fae7,abb31aa1f8ca.. > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h > @@@ -186,64 -159,20 +159,43 @@@ static inline void

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

2020-12-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h between commits: 923e1e7d8223 ("arm64: uaccess: rename privileged uaccess routines") 7cf283c7bd62 ("arm64: uaccess: remove redundant PAN toggling") from the arm64 tree and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-11-30 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, Nov 27 2020 at 13:54, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This >> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial >> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree >> is submitted for merging.

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-11-27 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 06:39:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > include/linux/kernel.h > > between commit: > > 74d862b682f5 ("sched: Make migrate_disable/enable() independent of RT") > > from the tip

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/highmem.c between commits: 298fa1ad5571 ("highmem: Provide generic variant of kmap_atomic*") 5fbda3ecd14a ("sched: highmem: Store local kmaps in task struct") from the tip tree and commit: 72d22a0d0e86

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: include/linux/kernel.h between commit: 74d862b682f5 ("sched: Make migrate_disable/enable() independent of RT") from the tip tree and commit: 761ace49e56f ("kernel.h: Split out mathematical helpers") from the

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/riscv/Kconfig between commit: 5cb0080f1bfd ("riscv: Enable ARCH_STACKWALK") from the risc-v tree and commit: 46b9b00649f6 ("arch, mm: restore dependency of __kernel_map_pages() on DEBUG_PAGEALLOC") from

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kspp tree

2020-11-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/Kconfig between commit: 5a3a47bf8367 ("orphans: Hoist '--orphan-handling' into Kconfig") from the kspp tree and commits: 84d8b3661cc9 ("arm, arm64: move free_unused_memmap() to generic mm") 46b9b00649f6

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-11-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: include/linux/mm.h between commit: 95bb7c42ac8a ("mm: Add 'mprotect' hook to struct vm_operations_struct") from the tip tree and commit: 6dd8e5dab7c1 ("mremap: don't allow MREMAP_DONTUNMAP on special_mappings

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

2020-11-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/filemap.c between commit: 0abed7c69b95 ("mm: never attempt async page lock if we've transferred data already") from the block tree and commit: b5c7e73f6bd3 ("mm/filemap/c: break generic_file_buffered_read

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-11-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/arc/Kconfig between commit: 39cac191ff37 ("arc/mm/highmem: Use generic kmap atomic implementation") from the tip tree and commit: b41c56d2a9e6 ("arc: use FLATMEM with freeing of unused memory map instead

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kunit-next tree

2020-10-15 Thread Shuah Khan
On 10/14/20 11:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:56:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: lib/kunit/test.c between commit: 45dcbb6f5ef7 ("kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP format")

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

2020-10-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/readahead.c between commit: fd0ec96ec35d ("readahead: use limited read-ahead to satisfy read") from the block tree and commits: 16681dc9dd92 ("mm/readahead: pass readahead_control to force_page_cache_ra")

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the counters tree

2020-10-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > lib/Makefile > > between commit: > > 37a0dbf631f6 ("counters: Introduce counter_atomic* counters") > > from the counters tree and commit: > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kunit-next tree

2020-10-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:56:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > lib/kunit/test.c > > between commit: > > 45dcbb6f5ef7 ("kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP format") > > from the kunit-next tree and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

2020-10-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:03:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > > between commit: > > 0178dc761368 ("arm64: mte: Use Normal Tagged attributes for the linear map") > > from the arm64

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-10-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: include/linux/sched.h between commit: d741bf41d7c7 ("kprobes: Remove kretprobe hash") from the tip tree and commit: faf4ffbfd1c5 ("fs/buffer.c: add debug print for __getblk_gfp() stall problem") from the

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kunit-next tree

2020-10-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: lib/kunit/test.c between commit: 45dcbb6f5ef7 ("kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP format") from the kunit-next tree and commit: e685acc91080 ("KUnit: KASAN Integration") from the akpm-current tree. I

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the counters tree

2020-10-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: lib/Makefile between commit: 37a0dbf631f6 ("counters: Introduce counter_atomic* counters") from the counters tree and commit: ed7f5253e189 ("mm/page_alloc.c: fix freeing non-compound pages") from the

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-10-07 Thread Atish Patra
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 21:48 -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 21:32 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020 03:39:06 PDT (-0700), Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict > > > in: > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-10-06 Thread Atish Patra
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 21:32 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020 03:39:06 PDT (-0700), Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict > > in: > > > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c > > > > between commit: > > > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-10-06 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Tue, 06 Oct 2020 03:39:06 PDT (-0700), Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/riscv/mm/init.c between commit: c29c38fa2a8b ("RISC-V: Remove any memblock representing unusable memory area") from the risc-v tree and

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

2020-10-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/riscv/mm/init.c between commit: c29c38fa2a8b ("RISC-V: Remove any memblock representing unusable memory area") from the risc-v tree and commits: 3520eeb79142 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock()

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pm tree

2020-10-01 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 07:53:53PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > include/acpi/acpi_numa.h > > between commit: > > 4849bc777049 ("ACPI / NUMA: Add stub function for pxm_to_node()") > > from the pm tree

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pm tree

2020-10-01 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: include/acpi/acpi_numa.h between commit: 4849bc777049 ("ACPI / NUMA: Add stub function for pxm_to_node()") from the pm tree and commit: 623347c1b949 ("x86/numa: cleanup configuration dependent command-line

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pm tree

2020-09-28 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:24:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c > > between commits: > > 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from ACPI static tables > that are not

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pm tree

2020-09-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c between commits: 01feba590cd6 ("ACPI: Do not create new NUMA domains from ACPI static tables that are not SRAT") 4eb3723f18e9 ("ACPI: Rename acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node() to

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

2020-09-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/page-writeback.c between commit: 1cb039f3dc16 ("bdi: replace BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES with a queue and a sb flag") from the block tree and commit: 7a3714df632a ("mm/page-writeback: support tail pages in

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the pidfd tree

2020-09-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: kernel/exit.c between commit: ba7d25f3dff6 ("exit: support non-blocking pidfds") from the pidfd tree and patch: "pid: move pidfd_get_pid() to pid.c" from the akpm-current tree. I fixed it up (I made the

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

2020-09-21 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:03:53PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > diff --cc arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > index 087a844b4d26,64211436629d.. > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > @@@ -493,21 -483,10 +494,15 @@@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp > #endif > >

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

2020-09-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c between commit: 0178dc761368 ("arm64: mte: Use Normal Tagged attributes for the linear map") from the arm64 tree and commit: 8e19cbb9528f ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree

2020-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/kasan_init_32.c between commit: 4c42dc5c69a8 ("powerpc/kasan: Fix CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC for 8xx") from the powerpc tree and commit: 76713c119a9d ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock()

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2020-09-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 04:22:03AM +, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > c999bd436fe9 ("mm/cma: make number of CMA areas dynamic, remove > > CONFIG_CMA_AREAS") > > > > from the akpm-current tree. > > I guess this is because Mike's patch was written on top of dma-mapping's next > branch.

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2020-09-15 Thread Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
ailing List > > Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the > dma-mapping tree > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > mm/Kconfig > > between commit: > > b7176c261cdb ("dma-c

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2020-09-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/Kconfig between commit: b7176c261cdb ("dma-contiguous: provide the ability to reserve per-numa CMA") from the dma-mapping tree and commit: c999bd436fe9 ("mm/cma: make number of CMA areas dynamic, remove

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree

2020-09-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: drivers/dax/device.c between commit: 4533d3aed857 ("memremap: rename MEMORY_DEVICE_DEVDAX to MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC") from Linus' tree and commit: ceb1b473719c ("device-dax: make pgmap optional for instance

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree

2020-09-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: .clang-format between commit: 4e4bb894467c ("clang-format: Update with the latest for_each macro list") from Linus' tree and commits: 7008a2f408a3 ("memblock: implement for_each_reserved_mem_region() using

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the net-next tree

2020-09-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/filemap.c between commit: 76cd61739fd1 ("mm/error_inject: Fix allow_error_inject function signatures.") from the net-next tree and commit: 2cb138387ead ("mm/filemap: fix storing to a THP shadow entry")

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the crypto tree

2020-08-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 20:14:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/crypto/mediatek/mtk-aes.c > > between commit: > > f441ba2ad341 ("crypto: mediatek - use AES library for GCM key derivation") > > from

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the net-next tree

2020-07-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: net/sctp/socket.c between commits: 89fae01eef8b ("sctp: switch sctp_setsockopt_auth_key to use memzero_explicit") 534d13d07e77 ("sctp: pass a kernel pointer to sctp_setsockopt_auth_key") from the net-next tree

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

2020-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: lib/cpumask.c between commit: 1abdfe706a57 ("lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs") from the tip tree and commit: 6f7ee3fd63c9 ("lib: optimize cpumask_local_spread()") from the akpm-current

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the crypto tree

2020-07-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: drivers/crypto/mediatek/mtk-aes.c between commit: f441ba2ad341 ("crypto: mediatek - use AES library for GCM key derivation") from the crypto tree and commit: 161f6a5cc3ea ("mm, treewide: rename kzfree() to

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

2020-07-16 Thread Will Deacon
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 06:00:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm64/mm/init.c > > between commit: > > abb7962adc80 ("arm64/hugetlb: Reserve CMA areas for gigantic pages on 16K > and 64K configs") > > from

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree

2020-07-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/arm64/mm/init.c between commit: abb7962adc80 ("arm64/hugetlb: Reserve CMA areas for gigantic pages on 16K and 64K configs") from the arm64 tree and commit: 10d44973d8ab ("mm/hugetlb: split hugetlb_cma in

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the jc_docs tree

2020-07-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst between commit: 059db4341303 ("Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst: copy-editing cleanup") from the jc_docs tree and commit: 7079aa70a489 ("doc, mm: clarify /proc//oom_score

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the net-next tree

2020-07-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/cma.h between commit: a2b992c828f7 ("debugfs: make sure we can remove u32_array files cleanly") from the net-next tree and commit: bc7212aceef6 ("mm: cma: fix the name of CMA areas") from the akpm-current

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >