Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2020-09-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 04:22:03AM +, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > c999bd436fe9 ("mm/cma: make number of CMA areas dynamic, remove > > CONFIG_CMA_AREAS") > > > > from the akpm-current tree. > > I guess this is because Mike's patch was written on top of dma-mapping's next > branch.

RE: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2020-09-15 Thread Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
ailing List > > Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the > dma-mapping tree > > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > mm/Kconfig > > between commit: > > b7176c261cdb ("dma-c

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2020-09-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: mm/Kconfig between commit: b7176c261cdb ("dma-contiguous: provide the ability to reserve per-numa CMA") from the dma-mapping tree and commit: c999bd436fe9 ("mm/cma: make number of CMA areas dynamic, remove

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2019-09-15 Thread Mark Brown
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page-coherent.h between commits: bef4d2037d2143a ("xen/arm: consolidate page-coherent.h") 60d8cd572f655aa ("arm64/xen: fix xen-swiotlb cache flushing") from the dma-mapping tree and

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2019-08-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/arm/Kconfig between commit: 936376f88ff1 ("arm: select the dma-noncoherent symbols for all swiotlb builds") from the dma-mapping tree and commit: 83286f0dcb91 ("arm: use generic mmap top-down layout and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2019-06-17 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 06:14:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: > > kernel/dma/remap.c > > between commit: > > 4b4b077cbd0a ("dma-remap: Avoid de-referencing NULL atomic_pool") > > from the dma-mapping

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2019-06-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: kernel/dma/remap.c between commit: 4b4b077cbd0a ("dma-remap: Avoid de-referencing NULL atomic_pool") from the dma-mapping tree and commit: 14de8ba3fa2e ("lib/genalloc.c: rename addr_in_gen_pool to

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2019-06-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: include/linux/genalloc.h between commit: 3334e1dc5d71 ("lib/genalloc: add gen_pool_dma_zalloc() for zeroed DMA allocations") from the dma-mapping tree and commit: 1c6b703cba18 ("lib/genalloc: introduce chunk

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2018-09-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/hexagon/Kconfig between commit: e0a9317d9004 ("hexagon: use generic dma_noncoherent_ops") from the dma-mapping tree and commit: 365c1f4922a4 ("hexagon: switch to NO_BOOTMEM") from the akpm-current tree.

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2018-09-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/hexagon/Kconfig between commit: e0a9317d9004 ("hexagon: use generic dma_noncoherent_ops") from the dma-mapping tree and commit: 365c1f4922a4 ("hexagon: switch to NO_BOOTMEM") from the akpm-current tree.

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2018-05-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/sh/Kconfig between commits: 86596f0a2833 ("scatterlist: move the NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH config symbol to lib/Kconfig") f616ab59c294 ("dma-mapping: move the NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE config symbol to lib/Kconfig")

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2018-05-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in: arch/sh/Kconfig between commits: 86596f0a2833 ("scatterlist: move the NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH config symbol to lib/Kconfig") f616ab59c294 ("dma-mapping: move the NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE config symbol to lib/Kconfig")

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2014-10-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:54:09 +0100 Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hello, > > On 2014-10-28 07:29, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:24:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > >> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in > >> mm/cma.c between commit

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2014-10-28 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 2014-10-28 07:29, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:24:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in mm/cma.c between commit 16195ddd4ebc ("mm: cma: Ensure that reservations never cross the low/high mem boundary")

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2014-10-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:24:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in > mm/cma.c between commit 16195ddd4ebc ("mm: cma: Ensure that > reservations never cross the low/high mem boundary") from the > dma-mapping tree and commit

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2014-10-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:24:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in mm/cma.c between commit 16195ddd4ebc (mm: cma: Ensure that reservations never cross the low/high mem boundary) from the dma-mapping tree and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2014-10-28 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 2014-10-28 07:29, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:24:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in mm/cma.c between commit 16195ddd4ebc (mm: cma: Ensure that reservations never cross the

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2014-10-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:54:09 +0100 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprow...@samsung.com wrote: Hello, On 2014-10-28 07:29, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:24:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2014-10-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in mm/cma.c between commit 16195ddd4ebc ("mm: cma: Ensure that reservations never cross the low/high mem boundary") from the dma-mapping tree and commit 2a70e5a78672 ("mm/cma: ake kmemleak ignore CMA regions") from the

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree

2014-10-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in mm/cma.c between commit 16195ddd4ebc (mm: cma: Ensure that reservations never cross the low/high mem boundary) from the dma-mapping tree and commit 2a70e5a78672 (mm/cma: ake kmemleak ignore CMA regions) from the